Will Shenyang Yin Moumou (Mrs. Yin) be legally responsible for the impact she has had on Shenyang?

The epidemic in Shenyang is indeed directly related to Yin Moumou. According to data reported by Shenyang, there are 13 related cases of imported cases Yin Moumou, including 2 relatives and 2 neighbors living together, 3 medical staff and 6 medical staff from multiple hospitals where Yin Moumou went for treatment. patients.

So, does it violate the criminal law that Yin Moumou had a fever and went to five hospitals for infusion, causing the spread of the new coronavirus? If there are no media reports, this may not necessarily involve criminal liability. According to the Supreme People's Court's "Opinions on Legally Punishing Illegal Crimes that Obstruct the Prevention and Control of the Novel Coronavirus Infection Pneumonia Epidemic", those who refuse to implement epidemic prevention and control measures for confirmed patients or suspected patients, intentionally spread the new coronavirus, and endanger the safety of the public shall be punished as dangerous. The method is to convict and punish the crime of endangering public security. So we mainly focus on confirmed and suspected patients here.

Yin returned to China on November 29 and was placed under centralized quarantine and observation on the same day. During the quarantine and observation period, he was tested twice for the new coronavirus nucleic acid and once for serum antibodies, and the results were both negative. After the quarantine period expires and multiple nucleic acid tests are negative, we naturally think there is no problem and lift the quarantine measures. From this perspective, both the old lady and our volunteers should consider that the old lady is not a confirmed patient or carrier of the new coronavirus. There is nothing wrong with the old lady's choice to go out. There is no intention or negligence. When the old lady had a fever and went to the hospital for treatment, there was no problem. Since the nucleic acid test showed no problems, it was naturally assumed to be a common cold and fever. But did the old lady take corresponding protective measures when going out, such as wearing a mask?

There should be several reasons for this incident. On the one hand, isolation measures and nucleic acid testing cannot rule out all confirmed cases. From a practical point of view, there are not a few cases where the incubation period of the new coronavirus exceeds 14 days. Our current quarantine period is generally 14 days, but it cannot eliminate all cases. At the same time, nucleic acid testing has accuracy problems. During the isolation period, Yin took two new coronavirus nucleic acid tests and one serum antibody test, but the results were all normal. Some of our cases have not been ruled out as confirmed cases even three or four times. On the other hand, there is the issue of hospital measures. Now is a special period for epidemic prevention and control, and we should pay attention to patients with fever. All patients with fever should undergo nucleic acid testing, and the test results will be given priority. Only in this way can we take timely measures. The old lady failed to take timely measures after seeking medical treatment for the first time with a fever, which resulted in multiple medical visits and eventually infected medical staff. On the other hand, our own epidemic prevention measures. Nowadays, many people are actually slacking off about the new coronavirus and have not taken basic measures such as wearing masks. There is no large-scale epidemic, but confirmed patients still appear from time to time, so we still need to take corresponding protective measures ourselves.

Mrs. Yin is not the only one who needs to be held responsible!

According to Mrs. Yin’s itinerary, she went out everywhere during the period of home isolation. From a personal perspective, Mrs. Yin bears unshirkable responsibility for the epidemic in Shenyang.

First, Mrs. Yin is of Korean ethnicity. Traveled to South Korea when the epidemic was in dire straits. I would like to ask: What kind of family and national affairs is the purpose of Mrs. Yin’s trip this time?

Second, Mrs. Yin’s husband and son are both state workers. After nearly a year of fighting against the epidemic, how can Mrs. Yin still go out during home quarantine?

Third, just after being scolded by many netizens, the Yin family knew how to use the law and the media to protect themselves. Since your family is so understanding, please explain in detail Mrs. Yin’s behavior of spreading poison everywhere!

From the perspective of Shenyang’s anti-epidemic situation, what happened to Mrs. Yin shows that the inaction and irresponsibility of some of our departments is the inevitable cause of this incident.

First, the community street control is not effective, or there is no control at all because of the special relationship of the Yin family.

Second, is the local police station responsible for poor control?

Third, the Yin family members also bear an unshirkable responsibility.

There are many rumors among the people that we won’t go into. The official announcement of Mrs. Yin’s itinerary and the Yin family’s words and deeds are unforgivable to all Shenyang people.

First of all, none of us are willing to break the law! The same is true for Mrs. Yin. But this incident exposed a question: Why did a loophole appear in this epidemic prevention network that had been woven for a long time? I think that as far as Mrs. Yin is concerned, she is just a fish that slipped through the net, and it is fundamental for those in charge of the net to mend the net as soon as possible. If Mrs. Yin should bear some responsibility, then those who manage the network should be held accountable and dealt with!

The city’s policy in Shenyang is 14 7. In addition to the 14 groups in centralized quarantine, this person also needs to be quarantined at home for 7 days. Within these 7 days, she went out and had a fever, and after being diagnosed again, she concealed her visit The small hospital has seen the symptoms of fever. If she is not held accountable, what if her selfish behavior caused those infected and caused more social and economic losses? Shouldn't adults who do not abide by public ethics and have such huge consequences for their own interests be taught a lesson? I don't know why she is still Will someone act like a moral emperor in this kind of thing, pretending that this is not the fault of the old lady herself, but the fault of those affected? As the subject of the incident, is she still a victim?

First of all, the time limit of the isolation system is simply unscientific. Professionals who set the quarantine period actually think that 14 days of quarantine is basically fine! In the minds of ordinary people, it is even better. Calling home quarantine is just a formality. Those who formulated this system know that it will not be implemented.

Isolated at home, what should your family do? Isn’t it still the same thing if it is transmitted to family members and spread among family members? ! If you don't live alone, there is no point in being isolated at home.

There is no point in condemning the old lady. We should find the reason from management.

The legal aspect requires professional answers. Let me first talk about the moral and responsibility aspects.

Ms. Yin undoubtedly bears a heavy responsibility for this incident. 14 days of centralized quarantine and 7 days of home quarantine are mandatory for overseas arrivals. After all, the current overseas epidemic situation is dangerous, and returnees should have this consciousness and awareness. Even if you don’t consider the whole society, you should also consider the health and safety of your family, relatives, friends, and neighbors!

Next, let’s talk about the 14-day quarantine requirement for overseas arrivals. 14 days is a very common limit for the incubation period. Currently, the longest incubation period of the new coronavirus in the human body is 25 days. The probability of onset after 25 days is extremely low, but the incidence within 21 days is no longer very rare. Since it is no longer the case that the disease manifests itself after 14 days, why not just quarantine for 21 days? Especially now that the overseas epidemic situation is so severe and the arrival of people is complicated. For the safety of the Chinese people and to consolidate the good and healthy environment that we have maintained at great cost, why not just quarantine for 21 days? !

Ms. Yin is 67 years old. As people get older, their awareness of regulations and system sensitivity will decrease. She will also think that she has been isolated for 14 days without any problems, so fever should not be a problem. COVID-19, but other illnesses, is indeed the case. If there was no one around, or to be more precise, without repeated reminders from her family and community, the old lady would be so confused that she would not even think about the new coronavirus. So, I went to see a doctor everywhere with the new coronavirus.

The harm Ms. Yin has caused to society is unforgivable, but understandable. If we ask whether we need to bear legal responsibility, is there a gap in the law in this regard? Can the crime of endangering public safety be applied? As an outsider, I cannot convict people arbitrarily, so I have excerpted some of the legal provisions and sentencing standards for "crime endangering public safety" for netizens to discuss.

I personally think:

1. Epidemic prevention personnel at the 14-day quarantine should focus on reminding older people and inform their family members to supervise and remind them.

2. When overseas immigrants leave the quarantine point, the epidemic prevention personnel at the quarantine point should have a detailed written handover with the community where the quarantined person is located.

3. After quarantined persons return to the community, the community should also visit, supervise and remind these persons.

4. When the incident occurred, it would not be appropriate to blindly denounce Ms. Yin. It was also caused by loopholes in the system. Therefore, it is more appropriate to hold accountable and pursue charges of malfeasance than to condemn Ms. Yin.

The key point of the problem is that the domestic epidemic control is so good that everyone is careless and relaxes their vigilance!

This matter should be due to insufficient community supervision. My brother and sister-in-law came back from the UK in November and were quarantined in Shanghai for 14 days. The community and the police station came and told them to stay at home for seven days and then one day. Four door-to-door visits! First knocking on the door, and then videotaping outside the door. My brother and sister-in-law and I didn’t have a chance to go out!

1. It depends on Shenyang’s quarantine system. If it is really concentrated at home for 14 days, 7 days, then he will be responsible, because she started going out the next day after returning home.

2. I have been to a quarantine system where even relevant community units cannot escape.

3. If the concentration is only required for 14 days, then Mrs. Yin has no responsibility.

The above is my personal opinion.

Special laws should be implemented in special times. For this old woman’s behavior, firstly, she must be severely punished, and secondly, she must bear the compensation for the losses caused to the country and the people. The hateful old woman must be punished by the whole people

Aunt Yin’s behavior makes people unable to avoid conspiracy theories. After all, Korean cults are famous! Otherwise, there is no way to explain why she deliberately concealed her whereabouts on the 21st, resulting in the omission of a confirmed infectious case!

Which normal person would be like her, whose first reaction after coming back from a high-risk area with a fever would not be to report for treatment, but to wander around Shenyang? Even if Aunt Yin didn't know about the 14 7 policy, you weren't even wary of having a fever just after you were quarantined? But treat it like a common cold?

Even if she is old and less vigilant? Where is her son and daughter-in-law? Don’t you have any sense of prevention at all? There are rumors on the Internet that her son is a public official. It has not stopped in Liaoning this year. Someone was infected in Dalian not long ago. I don’t believe that people who eat public food are not vigilant at all?

After returning from abroad, you suddenly develop a fever that does not go away during the 14-day home quarantine period. Do you have any doubts about this sign? His family is so caring that they don't care about anything that could kill them!

Now there are only two reasons. One is that Aunt Yin and her family are stupid and did not take the fever during the isolation period seriously; the other is that they were lucky and walked around Shenyang to see and see Is it really contagious?

Aunt Yin is an elderly lady. She has been to many places in Shenyang in the past few days. She has walked around the whole Shenyang. She has visited five hospitals alone. The results that are now known are two schools in Shenyang. Shut down, three hospitals were closed, all primary and secondary schools and off-campus institutions in Shenyang stopped offline teaching, and all eight million people in Shenyang were tested for nucleic acid. I don’t know how many people lost their jobs as a result, and how many companies suffered huge losses!

If this can be explained away by non-subjective malice, then the latest confirmed patient in Shenyang confirmed that Yin deliberately concealed her whereabouts on the 21st after the diagnosis, resulting in direct screening of close contacts. There were omissions in the process. If the confirmed patient is infected again, it is a subjective problem that caused the spread!

According to the "Opinions on Legally Punishing Illegal Crimes that Obstruct the Prevention and Control of the Novel Coronavirus Infection Pneumonia Epidemic", refusing to implement epidemic prevention and control measures for confirmed patients and suspected patients, deliberately concealing and deliberately spreading the new coronavirus, endangering the public It is safe, and he will be punished for the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous methods!

If she really concealed her whereabouts deliberately, I think it complies with relevant regulations and should be punished, of course after she recovers! Aunt Yin has three crimes:

1. Violated the 14-7 quarantine regulations for entry into Shenyang. After 7 days of home quarantine and fever, she wandered around, which directly led to 13 people being diagnosed with infection.

2. After Aunt Yin was diagnosed, she concealed her itinerary on the 21st, resulting in omissions in the screening, and one confirmed patient has been found.

3. While having fever symptoms during the quarantine period, I went to crowded train stations and Wanda Plaza. Four hospitals, including Pukang Hospital, became the hardest-hit area, and the current main infections occurred there. Hospital!