Is there any test question analysis and answering skills in the postgraduate entrance examination for Master of Laws?

(1) Examination paper of basic courses for non-law majors of LLM: full score 150, with 75 points for criminal law and 75 points for civil law.

Multiple choice questions, 65438+ 0 points for each small question, * * 40 points.

Multiple choice questions, 2 points for each small question, and 20 points for *** 10 question.

Short answer, each small question 10, ***4 questions 40 points.

Legal analysis questions, each small question 10, 20 points for ***2 questions.

Case analysis questions, each small question 15 points, ***2 questions 30 points.

(2) Examination papers for comprehensive courses for non-law majors of LLM: full mark 150, jurisprudence about 60, constitutional law about 50, and Chinese legal history about 40.

Multiple choice questions, 65438+ 0 points for each small question, * * 40 points.

Multiple choice questions, 2 points for each small question, and 20 points for *** 10 question.

Short answer, each small question 10, 30 points for ***3 questions.

Analysis questions, each small question 10 points, ***3 questions 30 points.

Essay questions, each small question 15 points, ***2 questions 30 points.

(3) Fa Shuo illegally learned answering skills.

Multiple choice questions: there is only one correct answer for a single choice, and two or more correct answers for multiple choices. The most important way to do multiple-choice questions is to push forward, that is, to pick out the correct answer from the alternative answers according to your own memory; If your memory is not accurate enough, you can use the elimination method, that is, eliminate incorrect alternative answers, and then the rest is the correct answer. The elimination method is best combined with the forward deduction method, and the effect is better. If none of the above methods can choose the answer, you can use the comparison method, that is, compare this question with related content (opposite or similar content) to determine the correct answer.

Answer: most of them are clearly stipulated in the legal provisions, or there are related contents in the teaching materials. Candidates only need to make a simple summary and induction. Compared with essay questions, the key to short answer lies in the word "Jane", and the answer should be comprehensive, accurate and concise.

Analysis of legal provisions: Qualitative analysis of legal provisions is the first and most important step. It is necessary to accurately judge what legal concept it embodies according to the content of the law. When setting questions, you should answer them according to the question type. No matter what the question type is, don't make too detailed analysis and don't deviate from the law itself, which will tell you many answers. ? The analysis of laws and regulations requires candidates to analyze the theoretical knowledge behind laws and regulations, rather than discussing laws and regulations. Therefore, if candidates have a relatively complete grasp of laws and regulations, they should concentrate on showing their theoretical knowledge. When answering questions, we should pay attention to combining point analysis, which has both knowledge points and corresponding explanations. We should not be too concise as short answers, nor too broad as discussing a point, and pay attention to analysis.

Case analysis: we can't simply give a conclusion, but often need to provide legal basis, and even need to analyze the legal basis. The characteristics of case analysis require us not only to master solid theoretical knowledge, but also to pay attention to how to use these basic theories to analyze and judge specific cases and put forward correct answers to the requirements of the topic. To do this, it is not enough to rely solely on rote memorization. In the process of reviewing, we should think more and do some case analysis questions for training.

Essay: Essay answers from three links, explaining the basic concept, characteristics and composition of the question, and sometimes talking about the differences, functions and corresponding conclusions from other propositions. You can appropriately add some of your own views or more advanced views in the theoretical circle, depending on the depth of your accumulation and thinking. This is a kind of question that can widen the gap and reflect the ability of candidates.