When traveling in poverty, do you choose the train or the plane?

First, let's look at the definition of poor travel. Poor travel is a very fashionable way of travel at present, and its most fundamental significance is to enjoy the greatest travel pleasure with the least money while traveling freely.

Knowing this fundamental significance, the choice of means of transportation for poor tourists should be decided in line with this concept. If the pre-budget time is sufficient, many times the plane will be cheaper than the current train (that is, long-distance bullet train or high-speed rail), saving a lot of time. Of course, there is one exception. Is the train or choose the ordinary K-prefix air-conditioned car in the past. If you choose a hard seat or a hard sleeper, the fare is definitely much cheaper than that of the plane, but it takes more than five times as long as the plane. If you want to think hard, you can consider it.

Another situation is that you will give up the plane and choose the train. If it is a night bus, it can solve the accommodation problem on the high-speed rail and save the hotel accommodation fee for one night when there is not much time. When you encounter this situation when you are traveling in poverty, the high-speed rail at night is definitely the best choice.

In fact, in many cases, the choice of transportation depends entirely on the specific situation, not just considering the level of fares. Time cost, price cost and travel quality cost should be considered together. It is the best choice to find a balance point that suits you best among the three, otherwise it will be a bit of a loss. I remember an experience nine years ago. I chose the flight from Xianyang Airport to Guangzhou after afternoon 10 for the simple pursuit of cheap air tickets. As a result, it didn't take off until after 12 in the afternoon, which was already after 3 am in Guangzhou. As a result, it is conceivable that fatigue and tiredness completely affect the travel quality of the whole trip.