If women rule the world, will there be fewer wars?

If women rule the world, the outbreak of war is inevitable. First of all, it must be clear that the war is not because men are bellicose, but to meet the needs of survival and human desires. War is a violent means, forcing one party to obey the will of the other party through armed struggle, and this will contains a lot of content. As long as people have selfishness, your selfishness and others' selfishness sometimes conflict, and the conflict in Romania is also different. The most direct way to resolve differences is war. Differences between ordinary people can be resolved through communication and mediation, and armed conflicts will only occur when it is impossible. This is because the social system enables people to remain rational, and people are afraid of the consequences of violent conflicts, so they will maintain peace. The differences between countries are not bound by law and morality, but only by the balance of interests. Once the interests are not satisfied, it will turn into a conflict between countries and a large-scale war is likely to break out.

Women's personality is more delicate than men's, and they don't like force at ordinary times, but this doesn't mean that women don't have their own desires. We can see that there are many examples of women fighting on campus and in daily life. Many women's fighting capacity is not less than that of ordinary men in the rankings. It can be seen that women are not all pacifists, but have encountered corresponding problems. And women's way of thinking is obviously different from that of men. Men are relatively more concerned about interests and will weigh before the conflict, except for a few violent elements.

Women's thinking is more emotional, and when they don't weigh the gains and losses according to their interests, they will make some wrong judgments because of their emotions. If women rule the world, personally, it will be easier for war to break out than the present society.

In primitive society, basically all civilizations developed from matriarchal society, and women ruled the world, but the conflicts between tribes did not stop at that time, which was the earliest prototype of war. In the early days of human society, the main purpose of war was to obtain food through plunder and ensure the prosperity and reproduction of one's own tribe. Humans in this period are relatively simple. They usually fight against nature and live below the subsistence level. All actions are for survival. Sometimes, the purpose of war is to expel other similar people within their own interests and ensure their own food, which is the same as large carnivores owning their own territory.

After the development of human civilization to a certain extent, the form of war has also changed, from plundering food to plundering more people and land in order to occupy more social resources. Many plundered people will become slaves, which is the origin of slavery society. The development of social productive forces has caused a large number of labor vacancies. People in this tribe can't finish these heavy manual labor, and people also want to live a better life, so catching slaves has become a necessity for the development of the tribe. Through a large number of wars, men's physical advantages have been fully exerted, so they will gradually evolve from matriarchal clan society to paternal clan society, and this evolution is more to meet the needs of war. When women can't bear large-scale armed conflicts, men will take the responsibility of initiating and ending wars.

War has been accompanied by the progress of human civilization, and it has nothing to do with whether women dominate the world or men dominate the world. The resources in the world are limited, but the development of population is infinite. Every country wants to occupy more resources and let its own people or some people enjoy higher treatment. In this process, there is bound to be confrontation between countries. Nowadays, many countries in the world are governed by women, but this does not change the nature of state relations.