The owner "waited for 6 years" but failed to deliver the house. The developer notified the owner to increase the price. Is his behavior allowed by law?

This kind of behavior is definitely not allowed under the law, and the law must have express provisions that prohibit this. No matter what you do in this world, there are rules. If you can make developers think this way and increase the price, wouldn't the world be in chaos? When we signed the contract, we set the price of this house. No matter whether the price of the house increases or decreases, the money we have to pay will not change. People have been waiting for six years and have not been able to hand over the house. This is already very angry. But in the end, you want to temporarily increase the price. Who can accept this?

Maybe you think that the current house prices are rising, so you think that the house price sold to others was cheaper and you want to increase the price. However, if someone bought this house and the house price fell after a few years, Then do you give the price difference to others? Therefore, business cannot be done like this, and it is absolutely impossible for the law to support them in doing so. Consumers have their own rights. If they want to take advantage, it will definitely not work. But if the agreed price wants to be changed in this way, then it will definitely not work. So if you go to court to file a lawsuit, they will definitely lose because they are unreasonable.

In fact, I think the developers are really digging their own graves, because the owners will certainly not be able to agree to their demands, and they certainly did not expect to have to wait six years to pay back the house when they bought it. Unable to hand over the room. After waiting for such a long time and not delivering the house, they could go to court to sue, not to mention you want to temporarily increase the price. Whether it is the failure to hand over the house or the price of the house, this is the developer's problem. If they sue, they will definitely lose. No one is willing to add this money, and it is impossible for them to give this money to developers, so they are completely shooting themselves in the foot, and they may have to pay liquidated damages by then.