Why is everyone not optimistic about Curry?

After graduating from high school, Stephen Curry attended the basketball camp of Duke University, hoping to join this famous basketball school. However, at that time, coach K of Duke University and his coaching team thought Curry was too thin and short to adapt to the intensity of NCAA, so they gave up inviting him.

Curry finally chose to enter davidson college.

In his freshman season, Curry became the best newcomer and scoring champion in the SEC League with an average of 2 1.5 points per game. In the second game of college, he contributed 32 points, 9 rebounds and 4 assists; Break the three-pointer record of freshmen in the 2007 Southern District Championship.

In his sophomore year, Curry led the dark horse davidson college to the quarterfinals of the NCAA tournament.

In March 2008, davidson college defeated the second seed of Gonzaga University, Georgetown University, NCAA University and the third seed of the University of Wisconsin. Curry became one of the four players who scored 30 points in the first four NCAA knockout games in history. Against the University of Kansas, Curry made a season 159 three-pointer, which set an NCAA single-season three-pointer record.

In his junior year, Curry completed the transition from offensive guard to point guard, averaging 28.6 points and leading the United States, and also contributed 4.4 rebounds, 5.6 assists and 2.5 steals. He surpassed the legendary John Gatti and became the scoring king in the history of davidson college. He scored 42 points against Oklahoma with Blake Griffin and set a new NCAA single-game scoring record.

Recently, David McMenamin, an ESPN reporter, launched a topic on Twitter, which set off the comment area. There are eight players in the NBA who are worth blocking the net worth of the team and can change teams themselves. The eight players are James, Leonard, Westbrook, Downs, Harden, Durant, Alphabet and Davis.

But there is no Curry's name on this list, even though the letter brother is impressively listed. Supporters believe that Curry is just a system player, a team star, not a player who can change the team by himself. Of course, some opponents say:

First of all, let's not talk about whether Curry can change the team, but about the people on this list. James needless to say, there is no dispute. Harden's achievements in leading the team in the past two years are remarkable. Leonard leads the Spurs in both offense and defense, Durant is not controversial, Shao Wei's leadership is debatable but barely passed, but what the hell are Downs, anthony davis and Brother Alphabet?

Anthony davis, he is an excellent scorer and has a strong defense, but it is a bit far-fetched to say that Davis changed the team by himself. Anthony davis has dedicated five years to the Pelican, and the statistics are beautiful, but has the direction of the team changed? Not in my opinion anyway. It's only one season. He has won more than 35 games, but that's not all for anthony davis.

Downs has unlimited potential, but his timberwolves have not yet entered the playoffs.

Brother Alphabet is really a monster, but he only brought the team to a winning percentage of 50%, only four games higher than the record before the Bucks chose him.

The above three people are better than Curry's team leader? Black people don't wear such black ones!

Anyone who has seen the Warriors' Ball will find that Curry's existence is the greatest deterrent to opponents. Curry can make many players around him better because he can attract defense and create huge space for teammates. Clay was the biggest beneficiary at first. Why did Durant play so well in Warriors? I think anyone who has seen this year's finals should know something about the Cavaliers' strategy of defending Durant alone. Barnes missed a lot of open shots last year, but it wasn't for nothing. This year's finals G 1 Cavalier JR Owen went out to pounce on Curry and gave Durant two points. Why McKee can score so efficiently in Curry's presence is not a stimulant. There are many examples, so I won't list them one by one.

If this doesn't change the team, then I don't know what is. Curry, when you snatched two victories from the Spurs in the 20 13 Western Conference semifinal with Clay Thompson, rookie Barnes, rookie Dreamcatcher Green and andrew bogut, who was slowly injured, only the Warriors surprised the Spurs in a cold sweat. At that time, clay could do very limited things except projection. Rookie Barnes is still young and rude. Rookie Green is out of shape and has knee problems. He's just a bench player, and Bogut can't play a few games all season because of minimally invasive surgery. In the playoffs, despite David Lee's injury, the team's record still far exceeded expectations. Except for the champion Heat, only the Warriors surprised the Spurs in a cold sweat, and finally they lost because the ankle injury slowed Curry down.

Therefore, Curry's core role in this system, people who really understand the ball and watch the ball understand that the warrior can't do without him at all, and his value is not reflected in the data. Again, no library, no soldiers. Maybe American media are used to talking about heroes with "talent" and data. A seemingly ordinary ordinary person will never get into the eyes of a basketball expert.

Thank you very much for reading Bian Xiao's article. Bian Xiao will make unremitting efforts to share the freshest and interesting knowledge with you, hoping to bring you happiness and relaxation. If you have different opinions about Bian Xiao, you can also tell Bian Xiao in the comments below.