Tell me about eating in the subway.

The topic of eating in the subway is not new, and it is often seen in the subway. In fact, in my opinion, it is a public topic, involving everyone, because it happens in public space, and people who eat seem to have fed their stomachs, but in fact they are still affecting the feelings of others!

First of all, let's analyze the reasons or reasons why the "diners" in the subway (as if this tall word should not be given to these people) eat in the subway, so that we can analyze whether these reasons can be established.

First, hungry! If you are eating pancakes, steamed stuffed buns and crab cakes, you will think that you really haven't had time to eat, and you are hungry. So, take the time to solve this problem in the subway.

Second, greed! I haven't eaten snacks for a long time, so I quickly went to the supermarket to buy snacks and carried them into the subway. I found a seat to sit down and indulge in it. "No, I have to eat." So, all kinds of snacks were taken out by him and eaten with relish.

Third, busy! "I'm too busy to eat at home or go to work, so I eat in the subway."

As for the reason why you are particularly "hungry", I think if you don't eat this kind of food in the subway, you won't starve or faint. However, when you feed your stomach with relish, the way you eat and the sound of eating will affect everyone in this subway car. Even if your eating posture is elegant and silent, the smell of scallion pancakes or leek boxes you eat will always permeate the closed space and invade everyone's nose. It's better to catch up with smog, because many people wear masks, and it's better to catch up with a cold, because his nose is airtight. Do you want others to wear masks for a meal in your subway? How hungry are you? When you feed yourself, you will make others feel disgusted. You satisfied your appetite, but you touched the bottom line of civilization. Therefore, what you call "special hunger" is only recognized as "hunger" lacking spiritual food. Don't patronize your own material food, but also lick your own spiritual food, otherwise no amount of long meat may be valuable.

There is no denying that everyone has a greedy bug in his stomach, but can he eat whatever he wants? Especially popular foods in the subway, such as "potato chips", "ice cream" and "melon seeds", when it comes to melon seeds, I think of last year's "Brother Guazi". The scene of being beaten in public is vivid and has aroused the discussion of many netizens. Most people fully support white-collar men who can't stand it. The melon seeds fell to the ground and the sound resounded through the carriage. We can't pray for a "hero to save the United States" in every subway car, but do it when we should. After all, solving by force is not advocated by civilized society. But didn't these "gluttons" solve their greed while eating in the subway? Didn't they imagine that you were "tempting" others in a special way? There are children who are not sensible in the subway. The demonstration effect is particularly obvious when you are eating.

The so-called "busy" about "busy" is actually lazy. I don't have time to eat at home, I don't have time to eat at work (maybe my work unit doesn't allow me to eat in the office), and the journey is too long. These reasons are actually "I am too busy". Can't you get up early in the morning? You can't eat at home Can't you eat outside the subway and then enter? Can't eat outside the subway, can't wrap it in a bag, and find a private space to digest when you get out of the subway? Some people are not working hours. In fact, he has no sense of civilization and doesn't know what to do anywhere.

When we see someone say that "eating in the subway" is uncivilized, these "diners" often give you a dirty look, meaning: "I like to eat or not, you dog, mind your own business!" What's more, bad words are added, and some even fight. Let the bullied become civilized, and the perpetrators will show off.

I remember that "Beijing Rail Transit Operation Safety Regulations (Draft)" was publicly solicited for public opinions, which stipulated that passengers were prohibited from eating and drinking in subway escalators, elevators, passages and carriages, and offenders would be given a warning by the municipal traffic administrative department or fined from 50 yuan to 500 yuan. This clause immediately attracted heated discussion and debate. There are those who support it and those who don't. Supporters believe that civilized travel should be advocated. Opponents believe that urban white-collar workers are nervous about going to work in the morning and should be more tolerant of eating breakfast in the subway. But the problem is, I'm afraid all perfume brands in the world can't resist the aroma of a pancake in a subway car.

Every time we discuss a question, someone will always ask the opposite question. For example, if you say that you are not allowed to urinate in the subway car, someone will say, "What if the child can't hold it?" ? Do you want to pee your pants? " ; When you say that you are not allowed to eat in the subway car, someone will say immediately, what if someone has hypoglycemia? You will faint if you don't eat. This reflects the psychology of the public, that is, there are special cases in everything. You can't die like this. You have to treat different people differently. But what are the rules? Rules are agreements reached after public compromise. It is impossible to take care of everyone, only as many people as possible. The promulgation of a law, if passed by a majority, can bind everyone. Therefore, as long as most people think that this kind of behavior should be prohibited, such rules should be adopted.

Of course, the problem of eating in the subway really reflects the quality and cultivation of the people. I think that the reason why "Beijing Rail Transit Operation Safety Regulations" does not stipulate "fasting" reflects the boundary and scope of legal and moral constraints. This rule is "safe" after all, so it is not safe to eat, and a pancake fruit will not smoke a person or a group of people. But I think it can appear in the Code of Civilized Conduct, starting from childhood and starting from ourselves, advocating the cultivation of civilized habits and putting an end to uncivilized behavior in schools and units.

Our GDP is already the second, but our passport-free country ranks 87th. Our population ranks first in the world, but our happiness index ranks 83rd. We complain that people in other countries exclude mainlanders, and Hong Kong people don't like mainlanders. Even if we can confidently say "you can't be arrogant and biased", if we look at the following data, we will find that there is indeed a big gap. Every citizen needs to start with a little civilization. We want to catch up with happiness, and we want to feel happiness!