After staying here for a few months, I felt the difference of Shum Yip Property firsthand.

Concerning issues about property and owners, the questions and answers vary. Generally speaking, everyone takes a step back or swallows their anger and forgets it. In serious cases, they basically take the method of bringing the matter to court. To be honest, no matter whether you win or lose, no matter who gets it, you will be upset and sigh. Why is this?

I don’t want to say more about the history of property management, and there is nothing profound about it. After the so-called “property management certificate” was cancelled, everyone understood that this industry should actually be a real service. Industry, then why has this service become a tyrannical "rent collector" in the eyes of many property owners? And in the eyes of some property owners, have owners become "tough people" again? To put it bluntly, a situation like this is like a "couple" who is forcibly tied together. They are paid to open and shut their mouths, and they are a "couple" who will never compromise. See if the following words apply to you.

The first "combination" method comes from unscrupulous developers. In similar combination methods, the property is like the developer's "illegitimate daughter". The "pre-property contract" is forced into the longing hearts of the owners. (The strange thing is that most owners can tolerate it.) Most of these properties are said to be the developer's "after-sales service", but in reality Click on the developer's "fig leaf". We are not going to talk about warranty or not and whether the property will be repaired here, but we are going to talk about the core! What is the core? It is a question of where the employees working in these properties should go after the developers completely withdraw. Such a property is sad and hateful. No matter how it is set up and operated, the ultimate goal is just for a smooth exit and the last cost recovery. Just imagine, who would not do this kind of "marriage" if given the opportunity? How about "thinking more" about yourself? For a long time, it is just words, "Owner, you think too much."

The second way of "combination" comes from the property owners committee. Similar combination methods are like the property management and property management. When the committee reached a "second marriage agreement", it was easy to talk but hard to deal with. If more than one "majority" passes, the remaining "minority" will be sent to the saliva bubble of the "difficult people". Here we need to divide it into two parts: one is the amateur nature of the owners committee members, and the other is the clique nature of the owners committee members which will be difficult to avoid in the later stage. Let’s not talk about who has selfish motives or who’s level, let’s talk about the core! What is the core? The core is that it would be good if most of these invited properties can maintain their status quo under the supervision of the property owners committee. (As time goes by, the facilities and equipment in the community will become increasingly aging, and various expenses will be higher than in the previous period. Be big.) Just imagine, is there any relationship between improving services and increasing property income? If so, will it not in many cases affect the rights and interests of some "unruly people" to a greater or lesser extent when creating conditions to increase income? (Most owners will not easily agree to increase property management fees without seeing obvious improvements, and most property management companies will not build a brand regardless of cost as soon as they enter the market.) If so, then it will most likely happen. There are two situations: one is that the property management company and the owners committee are pushing the blame with each other in front of the problem, and the other is that the property management company "kidnaps" the owners committee driven by business needs or interests, and once again "cooks the rice and turns it into rotten rice", then you How can those damaged owners understand the fairness and justice that property rights law gives every owner? How do you think about the fact that the "majority" and the "minority" will always change? Therefore, in the end, upgrading and improving services is just a matter of changing the contradiction. In one sentence, "Owner, you are thinking too much."

We can't talk about it without having an opinion. Time and development will Proof: Property is a transitional product.

The refinement of social division of labor, the improvement of service quality and the improvement of public quality will inevitably lead to the final curtain call of this industry. Aren't many things already proven? If the toilet is clogged, the one you paid for can finally clear it. If you forget to bring the key, the unlocker will be hired. If the board, wall, or window is cracked or leaking, you still have to hire outside "collaboration" to solve the problem. The elevators are hired by a professional maintenance unit, the sanitation is cleaned by the aunts who bring lunch boxes, and the light bulbs are replaced by maintenance workers who are very single. In the end, neighborhood disputes have to be mediated by the police station. In the end, the thief still has to go to the police himself; doesn’t the property management often say that whether it is express delivery or parking, they have no obligation to keep it? In the final analysis, power outages and water leaks are caused by decoration. Whether it is water, electricity, heating, transfer of supply, or collection and payment, many of them are not cut off because of the superficial service of the property. As long as it is a place that can increase income, every Don’t let go of even an inch, and anyone who objects is a “trickster!”...

In short, property management can “help you find people to help you survive” and can often “find people to help you survive”. It’s not an unearned reputation, so don’t ask questions about whether the property is good or bad. Whether you have complaints or joys in the future, the root cause still lies with you, the owners, yourself, right?