Some middle school textbooks in Hubei Province have deleted the sentence "There is a golden house in the book and Yan Ruyu in the book". what do you think?

Teenagers have two completely different choices to read classics. One is to delete the words they think are feudal dross, and the other is to keep the original text. Who is right and who is wrong? My point is: since the classic text is chosen, it is necessary to keep the original appearance completely, so that students can fully understand the meaning of ancient Chinese. "The book has its own golden house, and the book has its own Yan Ruyu", which tells people that with the improvement of cultural literacy, career prospects will be better, material living standards will naturally improve, and it is easy to get a happier love and marriage life. Some scholars are self-righteous and blindly delete sentences that they think have a negative impact on teenagers, which fully shows their psychological gloom! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As long as our teachers are competent and savvy, they can fully understand the classics and teach and educate people. Speaking of this, it involves the deep-seated problems of education in China. I won't go into details. Bottom line: it is a long-term and arduous task to carry forward the classics of Chinese studies.