If all electronic games were turned off, would children take their studies seriously?

A considerable number of parents think so. But if video games are really shut down, they will blame the short video platform. After shutting down the short video, they should continue to blame variety shows, cartoons and American TV series, and even comic books and toy manufacturers... In short, this It's other people's responsibility, they themselves have done a good job.

No.

There are no online games and stand-alone games are red alerts. Aren’t there a large number of people playing CS?

Without computers, wouldn’t there be people playing mahjong and martial arts novels?

There isn’t even mahjong. Aren’t there cockfights, dogfights, and chess games that people play?

Since the day there were people, there have been entertainment activities. Whether it is playing chess and cards or eating, drinking and having fun, there are many things to distract attention. Did these prevent the Han Dynasty from producing Xiaolian? Or did it hinder the Sui and Tang Dynasties from becoming scholars? Did it hinder the emergence of writers in the Song and Yuan Dynasties? Or did it hinder the Ming and Qing Dynasties from unifying the country? Which of these projects is not more difficult than simple study? Isn’t everything done?

If your child doesn’t study hard, look for the reason from your own child, and stop blaming this and that.

What this means is...it seems like you can be a top student even without TV.

Your question already shows your attitude. Can banning opium make the Qing Dynasty stronger? No! Then why ban it? Think about it yourself

For a long time, games have Many parents regard it as a "scourge" and "spiritual opium". They feel that their children are completely delayed by games. If there were no games, the situation would be much better than now. Almost every once in a while, there will be news like this: children recharge xx million into the game while their parents are not paying attention. It is too difficult. And it can arouse heated discussions every time, and it has proven successful every time.

Many netizens have the same view on this issue. Games are just an excuse, a "cover" that can explain the decline in students' performance and cover up the incompetence of parents' education. Of course, this does not mean that the game itself has no problems, but that any kind of entertainment behavior has a tendency to become "addictive" because they feel happy when performing this entertainment activity.

Not to mention electronic games, my high school classmates were once obsessed with table tennis, and they didn’t even miss the ten minutes between classes. Everyone will think it's great to play table tennis, but "addiction" is also not advisable.

There are no games, but if you don’t focus on learning, then learning efficiency is out of the question.

Some teachers called on students in class: xx, do you have flowers on your nails? I've watched you "kouchi" for half the class without even looking up at the blackboard! (A netizen’s mother told him that when he was in school, he could play half a class just by playing with his nails)

Without games, there may also be “walking” and “running”, which is simpler than studying and even better than studying. There are so many fun things to do, and it’s endless.

There is a simulation game called "Chinese Parenting", which cleverly uses education, a controversial subject that can arouse strong protests, and once became a sensation in the domestic gaming circle. level game. In the game, everything that happens in the period from birth to college entrance examination is dramatized in the game, and players can play the role of a parent and cultivate the "children" in the game according to their own ideas and plan " child's life.

In this way, players can also understand the painstaking efforts their parents have put into them. However, the real growth process of children has no strategy and no fixed solution. It also requires parents to work hard and grow with their children.

"Xi Meng's mother chose a neighbor." If it weren't for Meng's mother's meticulous observation of Mencius, how could there be a story about "Meng's mother moving three times"?

Some parents nowadays are busy with work and making money, and neglect to take care of their children. In the end, their children are addicted to games and recharge their hard-earned money into the game every minute. As soon as the news comes out , everyone is denouncing "games are harmful to people".

The road is long and we still need to work hard.

Children do not study seriously because they are not serious. Is it because they are not serious about electronic games? No, it’s human nature to be careless and lazy, let alone a child. Without video games, TV, novels, etc., even if we go back to the ancient life without electricity and Internet, children can still play together at the doorstep. .

Reading is an experience for children as they grow up. It helps us acquire learning abilities. At the same time, playing is also an important part of the growth process. If children only know how to read every day during their teenage years, even if they forget to eat and sleep, As a parent, do you really want to see this?

The key to whether you want to learn or not depends on yourself. Just cancel all external interference factors. People who like to learn will learn no matter what, and those who don’t like learning will still not learn.

I don’t think so. You need to cultivate a good love for reading in your child, so that he will learn habitually. Children love to play. The more you don’t let him play games, the more likely he will be. Thinking about having fun and half-heartedly studying

Of course not. Speaking from my own experience, we who were born in the 1980s had very few electronic games when we were children. Did we study seriously? Maybe, maybe not.

There were no video games, but other sports, such as playing football and basketball. At that time, it was just for fun. You just had to have fun. It was not like taking part in a sport now and treating it as a quasi-profession. , maybe it is true that he has not made any contribution to the national sports industry, so wouldn’t it be a happy childhood?

There are no electronic games, but there are other things, such as playing poker, playing marbles, and making foreign movies. There are many battles of wits and courage, and even various strategies. At that time, I watched the "God of Gamblers" series. There was no teacher to teach me, so I practiced card skills hard and taught myself. I was also able to draw cards, draw cards, straight cards and many other skills.

There are no electronic games, but there are other things. In addition to playing various games, you also have to work, and there are even special holidays for farming. You don’t necessarily feel tired when you work. After all, if you work more, there will always be more dishes on the table, which is really delicious.

After talking about these miscellaneous things, I just want to say that studying seriously has nothing to do with video games.

If studying seriously only refers to classroom study, then you have to distinguish whether you like class or not. If reading seriously means reading seriously, then I think almost all children can do it. Not to mention when we were children, boys read martial arts and girls read romance. Who hasn’t had the experience of reading under the covers with a flashlight? Even now, my children will spend all their time watching Douluo and Three Lives and Three Worlds.

I think the question is about classroom learning, so let me share my point of view. I think the education model needs to be reformed and students need to be taught in accordance with their aptitude. Many studies have also shown that the current classroom education is more suitable for children who can calm down, listen to lectures, and do more exercises. Such children will have greater advantages in exams. In fact, when we look back on the process of learning our mother tongue, isn’t it just casual listening, speaking, speaking and practicing? Who stipulates that you have to sit upright when listening to others? It’s just natural, haven’t you learned it all?

This question is a bit big, and the thinking is not clear yet, but I always feel that everyone is sitting there, listening to a lecture by one person, and also assigned a bunch of study questions, which is a bit different from the current colorful era. Out of place.

Let’s hope that education can take on a new look like other industries full of innovation.

Design reading as an electronic game. This is the only electronic reading game that is fun. It should be possible