What do you think of working overtime in the work group after 90?

Lying and watching, sitting and watching, tired of sitting, climbing the window to watch. Don't always give your hat to the post-90s generation. Although the boss and employees are superior and subordinate, it is necessary to give employees some respect, but it does not mean that the boss can do whatever he wants. It is obvious that employees think that what the boss said is wrong and argue with the boss directly in the work group. Is it necessary to exaggerate the incident with the words post-90 s and moral kidnapping?

Say "post-90 s" first. This word is a special word used by modern people to describe people born in 1990. It is regarded as a commendatory term, but I don't know when it started, and some people always like to associate it with a certain kind of people, especially to describe something that has great influence and belongs to negative events. Take this incident as an example. In the workplace, after 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 or even 00, which generation of workplace people are not stabbed? Which generation of workers lack bosses and bosses? Don't always judge a group of people by their age, which is unfair and objective.

Let's talk about "taking the boss in the work group" first. If it is a normal work exchange, employees have the obligation and responsibility to obey the arrangement of the boss and manager, but obedience does not mean blind obedience and reasonable compliance requirements, and employees need to abide by them. However, if it exceeds the employee's tolerance or bottom line, the employee has the right to resist. Although it seems to protect the legitimate rights and interests of both workers and enterprises, the reason why the state formulates labor laws is actually more inclined to this. Because the enterprise is a strong side, more than 50% of the labor disputes and arbitration cases in the past were caused by enterprise management violations, wage deduction and illegal layoffs. Does this not explain the problem?

Take the "moral kidnapping" of overtime as an example, which is obviously beyond the scope of compulsory overtime, and employees have the right to refuse. Since business owners want their employees to contribute, they should adopt a good attitude and listen to their opinions. Moreover, employees only repay their bosses, not personal attacks. There is no stipulation in the labor contract that they must obey all the boss's orders, nor does it stipulate that employees cannot pay attention to their bosses.

So in my opinion, it is normal for this employee to worry about the boss in the work group. We're all adults. Regardless of whether the incident is right or wrong, there are legal constraints at the national level and moral constraints at the individual level, while enterprises have labor contracts and labor laws. As long as it is ready to bear the consequences, all the stars in the sky dare to try to pick one, let alone an unscrupulous boss.