The great German writer Goethe went out for a walk once

Goethe's tolerance, wit and humor not only skillfully maintained his dignity, but also avoided a meaningless quarrel.

The ideas of critics and Goethe are opposite, and the road allows only one person to pass. Consider the concept of time and space, that is, the first person to pass takes less time and travels a shorter distance.

Both the critic and Goethe wanted to pass first. The critic said, "I never give way to fools!" The critic also made an assumption that the people I gave way to were all fools. This assumption is based on the expectations of both parties. Goethe accepted this assumption and stepped back. This shows that Goethe was no fool. In the process of retreating, he said: "I am just the opposite!" This sentence means that I will make way for fools. At this time, the critic is a fool, because he passed because Goethe made way for him.

If the critic does not choose to go through this path, but chooses to retreat to make way for Goethe, then he denies the hypothesis that Goethe was a fool. Goethe could quickly pass this distance.

Can you accept it as the most satisfactory answer? Thank you