People who know history tell me what is the difference between the current "enclosure movement" and the historical "enclosure movement".

The history of enclosure movement will not be introduced in detail, but can be seen everywhere, with a lot of information posted in front. To put it simply, the essence of "enclosure movement" is a kind of coercion, which forces a large number of people to a road of selling sweat and cheap labor.

The enclosure movement opened the way for large-scale industrialization. Before the enclosure movement, Britain was an agricultural country. A large number of people at the bottom are engaged in agricultural production on other people's land and pay a lot of land rent. Their life is poor, but they can get by. After the enclosure movement, they lost their land and were forced into exile in emerging industrial cities. In cities, they have to sell more blood and sweat to survive. Their blood and sweat provided the impetus for the rise of Britain. Without the enclosure movement, British industrialists could not get so many cheap labor in a short time. Without so many cheap labor, Britain's industrialization could not have been completed so smoothly.

As for "enclosure movement", it is an interesting coined word, but it is certainly not a popular common word. But I understand what the person who created the word wants to express.

Nowadays, the real estate industry is driving up house prices crazily, turning real estate from a necessary commodity with rigid demand into a financial tool, thus attracting a large number of speculators to enter the real estate industry, artificially creating shortages, hoarding and monopolizing a large number of real estate. And a large part of people who have no housing can only look at the house and sigh!

This result is contrary to the enclosure movement. The enclosure movement drove a large number of laborers from rural areas to cities and became the victims of industrialization. On the contrary, a large number of young people without housing may choose to leave first-tier cities and enter second-tier or even third-tier cities. At the same time, employment opportunities in second-and even third-tier cities will be in short supply, and some people who could only live in second-and third-tier cities will be forced to return to towns and even rural areas. Therefore, a special achievement of enclosure movement may run counter to urbanization. That is to squeeze the living space of young people in big cities, thus squeezing a large number of school-age young people into small towns and even villages.

Of course, it should be clear here that although the enclosure movement is bloody, it conforms to the market operation mechanism. Housing enclosure movement is a deformed market operation mechanism. The enclosure movement has created a new group of exploiting classes. They will soon find that their power is invalid after gaining some kind of exploitation power in a short time.

This era allows you to be better than others and thus have more money than others. But this society still needs justice and fairness. You can't turn this wealth into a tool of exploitation just because you are richer than others at a certain stage.

The government has an unshirkable responsibility in the process of high-speed housing price rise, which objectively helps the government to improve the speed of economic development. But the government has the responsibility and obligation to safeguard social justice and fairness. The government has the responsibility to make the cake bigger. It is the government's mission to distribute cakes fairly. Today, in order to make a big cake, the government is somewhat powerless in fair distribution, and even acquiesces in some unfair phenomena. However, as the cake grows bigger and bigger, these new exploiting classes will realize the government's sense of responsibility and mission in pursuing justice and fairness.