Debate: The responsibility of the generation gap lies mainly with the younger generation.

First of all, about the focus of the debate.

The generation gap is caused by the confrontation and conflict between elders and younger generations in concepts, habits and hobbies. Debate needs to judge the attribution of responsibility. Obviously, it regards the generation gap as a bad thing and an obstacle to social progress and development. If it is a good thing, there is no need to blame anyone at all, but who should be attributed.

In all fairness, the generation gap is mainly caused by history and physiology. The generation gap is actually a very normal social phenomenon, an inevitable historical event in time, and also a biological event. The former refers to the development and change of society, which will inevitably make the elderly and young people have different social experiences. With the development of history, people's social environment and social tasks will certainly be different; The latter refers to a person from youth to old age, physical changes will inevitably bring about psychological and behavioral changes.

Since the generation gap is caused by history and physiology, it stands to reason that no one should be responsible and no one should be responsible. But now the debate is to be investigated by the debater, so how should it be investigated? I think we can start from two aspects:

1, hold one party responsible for wrong thoughts and actions. That is to say, elders or younger generations have some ideas or habits and hobbies that should not be generated for each other. This "should not" refers to some thoughts and behaviors of elders or younger generations, which have historical and physiological reasons, and more importantly, stubbornness and willfulness.

2. Investigate the responsibility for treating the generation gap wrongly. In the questioner's view, the generation gap can be avoided, weakened and eliminated. Whoever has no initiative in this regard will be responsible; In the author's view, the generation gap can still be induced, worsened and maintained, and whoever takes the initiative in this regard will have an unshirkable responsibility.

Second, the definition of "generation gap"

The generation gap, first of all, is a kind of difference, which refers to the differences between the two generations in values, psychological state, living habits and so on. For example, the opinions of some singers and so on.

The generation gap is still a kind of exclusion. The real meaning of the generation gap is the mutual exclusion and avoidance between different generations due to the differences in basic values, which leads to the influence of basic values on generations different from their own. For example, teenagers think that their parents are old-fashioned and conformist, and parents complain that their children are not practical and too fashionable.

In the debate, if one party only understands the generation gap as difference, then the scope of responsibility it can find is much smaller and it is likely to deviate from the concept of "responsibility" to "cause".

If one party can work hard at exclusion, then they can more fully find the responsibility of their elders (younger generations) and the facts listed are more convincing.

For example, parents like playing mahjong and children like chatting online. It's hard to say whether there is a generation gap. If children complain that their parents play mahjong and parents interfere with their children's online chatting, then such a generation gap is obvious, and it is easier for us to find out who is responsible.

Third, about the attribution of "responsibility"

As the saying goes, it takes two hands to make a sound. If there is opposition and conflict, it must be the responsibility of both sides. However, in the debate, we should not be so unprincipled, each playing 50 boards, and both sides of the debate should distinguish the size of the fault. And what's wrong with the generation gap?

1, one side is wrong.

Zheng Fang can easily explain the mistakes of his predecessors' viewpoints from the aspects of times, freedom, internationalization, pluralism and scientificity. The opposing party can easily explain the mistakes of the younger generation in terms of norms, order, culture, tradition, unity and nationality.

2. Errors caused by one party.

It is wrong to interfere because others have different opinions, especially when both sides have reasonable opinions. This kind of mistake mostly happens to elders, because they regard interference as education. This kind of mistake is excusable, but if the younger generation commits it, it will be a big crime.

3. The wrong state of one party to the other.

The generation gap in some aspects can be bridged by communication. In this case, both sides have the obligation to actively seek opportunities and ways to bridge the generation gap. Whoever is mature should do more. If he doesn't do it, he is at fault. In my opinion, elders are more qualified before children reach adulthood, and younger generations are more qualified after children reach adulthood.

One side's mistake aggravated the generation gap.

There are many ways to aggravate the generation gap, such as military means, economic means, legal means, public opinion means, isolation means and spiritual means. Suppress or coerce the other party into submission. Older people use military and economic means to commit crimes, while young people use isolated and spiritual means more when they are adults.

5. One party failed to prevent the other party from forming a wrong view.

Some wrong views can be eliminated before they are formed, that is, after taking certain measures, one party will not form wrong views at all. For example, children are addicted to games and adults are addicted to gambling. At this point, the conditions of the elders are better. However, the opposing party can also find the responsibility of the younger generation under certain circumstances.

6. One party can't tolerate the mistakes of the other party according to certain reasons.

This is a mistake that is easily overlooked by both sides of the debate. The opposing party should never be ignored, because the elders have an advantage of exemption in the generation gap: the younger generation should respect the elders, tolerate their mistakes, understand the limitations of history, and so on. But the positive side is not unreasonable, and the younger generation also has excuses, such as children being too young to understand.

Fourth, about the strategy of debate.

This debate is equivalent, and the difficulty is the same for both sides.

1, select a typical case

Both sides can find countless examples to prove their views. Who is typical, who scores. Typical mistakes are obvious in the younger generation or elders, vivid and touching, once sensational, commented by experts and celebrities, causing public concern, representing a certain type. If you want to find it in the above six ways, it is still relatively easy to find it. It should be noted that we should not go to extremes and regard some criminal acts as the performance of one side of the generation gap.

2. Analyze and explain things

Analyze, compare or contrast examples in general, and explain them from all angles. The key to reasoning is to be good at reducing a specific thing to a common sense. A lot of common sense, to see if the attribution is accurate. It should be noted that: comparing the younger generation with the older generation, the fault is only a relative fault. Don't blindly investigate the fault of the other party, it just shows that one generation has more faults than the other.

3. Refute immediately.

The other party gives an example, and he immediately gives an example of the opposite nature. It should be noted that, for example, correspondence can be reflected in the following aspects: similarity or continuity in subject matter, opposition or acceptance in reason, docking or similarity in words, and so on. The first example is always passive, because the opponent can always give the opposite example immediately, so it is best to work harder on typicality and correspondence. Sometimes it is necessary to adopt the tactics of intensive attack or intensive defense.