Stargazing doesn't mean you can surf at will. What does it mean to pick the stars on the travel itinerary?

"Travel card with stars" bid farewell to the historical stage. For a time, it caused discussion among many netizens. Some people think this is a good thing. The state should optimize prevention and control measures to make it easier for people to travel. Some people think that with the stars in Beijing, Shanghai and Nanjing, this is also an important measure to restore economic operation, which is a good thing for cultural tourism, hotels and catering industries;

Some people think that even if "stars are picked", some places have their own "risk lists", which will still be overweight. On the contrary, they will be more strict and rigorous because of risk investigation. Today, let's talk objectively. What message does the cancellation asterisk of travel itinerary code convey? What's the impact?

We can clearly see that tourism, culture, transportation and other industries have suffered huge losses over the past two years. The main reason is that everyone's travel is subject to various restrictions, which greatly reduces the willingness to travel. For those who engage in logistics, layer by layer overweight also reduces the transportation efficiency, increases the transportation cost, and naturally reduces the enthusiasm of transportation development.

We should know that logistics is the economic lifeline of today's society, and vegetables, fruits, rice, grain, oil and household appliances are all transported by logistics. More importantly, these only account for a small part, and more basic raw materials, especially industrial basic materials need to be transported.

For example, the coal needed for power generation must be transported from coal-producing provinces to power plants all over the country. Once the trip code is marked with an asterisk, it also greatly restricts the logistics and transportation in this area and seriously affects trade and economy.

Is it free to cancel the asterisk in travel itinerary code? When the asterisk is removed from the travel itinerary code, many people's first reaction is that they can go out and play as they please in the future, without worrying about all kinds of uncertain variables. But in fact, the original intention of the "with stars" policy itself is to reduce the flow of people in high-risk areas. What really prevents everyone from going out to play is not the stars, but the epidemic prevention policies that are overweight.

The current itinerary code is "idolize", which is more like a starting point, but it can really coordinate epidemic prevention and control with economic development in a truly efficient way, thus promoting the flow of people. The root of all this lies in whether the epidemic prevention policies in various places will be overweight.

Therefore, while rejoicing, we also need to be vigilant. The "one size fits all" management inertia thinking still exists, and the people-oriented epidemic prevention model still exists. In order to implement the new version of the prevention and control plan, it is necessary to increase the number of layers for rectification. Scientific research to protect the economy is not only the voice of the people, but also the greatest livelihood.