Tell me about your usual way of thinking and thinking deduction?

First of all, when I saw this topic, I immediately thought of the protagonist in the English drama Sherlock.

Because the protagonist (Sherlock Holmes) is very sensitive in thinking, he can quickly collect detailed information for integration and induction, that is, "combing ideas." And he can calculate the course, development and trend of things through some small details, including people's personality, habits and so on, that is, "thinking deduction"

After all, Shylock is somewhat exaggerated, but it also gives the audience a deeper understanding of "thinking". A person's thinking ability has two kinds, one is abstract thinking and the other is logical judgment. The second is thinking in images, focusing on the construction of images. Of course, in reality, many people combine abstraction and image to maximize their thinking ability when combing thinking and deductive thinking.

For me, my thinking is also a combination of abstraction and image. Let me talk about my way of thinking and thinking deduction.

1, thinking comb

The object to be sorted out must be the knowledge or events you have been exposed to. If a new knowledge doesn't even know what to say, how to sort it out? After learning a relatively large knowledge system, we need to sort out our ideas in order to better remember and understand. I will divide the knowledge points of this knowledge system into many points, and try to sum up similar contents to the same point. Now these points are juxtaposed, and it is difficult to find a relationship, so I will try to find their relationship, such as difficulty, inclusion relationship and so on. And try to connect these points into several small systems, and then let this knowledge system include several small systems together.

My way of thinking is from details to the whole, much like a mind map (above). Mind mapping is like a divergent thinking, with a knowledge system in the middle and small systems at all levels in the branches. Mind mapping is to show the relationship between topics at all levels with a hierarchical diagram that is subordinate and interrelated, and to establish a memory link between topic keywords, images and colors. Mind mapping is a combination of logic and images (divergent images), so it will be easier to sort out ideas.

2, thinking deduction

This is really a bit hard to say. My understanding of thinking deduction is: through a point, deduce the association point 1, then deduce the association point 2 ... and draw a conclusion. I can give an example here. I was deeply impressed by a question in the driver's license theory exam: C 1 How long is the internship period of driver's license? A: 12 months. I remember this problem through thinking deduction. The following is my deduction process:

(1), see the topic keyword "internship" first, and extract it. (2) From "internship" to "infancy", because spending infancy is actually a process from immaturity to maturity, and so is internship. I will think of a living "baby" image when necessary. (3) The homonym of the word "baby" is just the numbers 1 and 2. ④ Remember the answer: 12 months.

So I can deduce the conclusion "12" from the keyword "internship", and make use of the connection between points. If the middle deduction process can be combined with the image, the deduction speed will be greatly accelerated and the effect will be obvious. This is my way of thinking. In fact, in the detective's mind, thinking deduction is often carried out. Through the collected information, I tried to infer the event 1 from a point, and the event 2 ... from the event 1, and finally came to a conclusion. When the reasoning process or conclusion is wrong, I rule out this deduction process and then deduce other possibilities ... This is what I know as "thinking deduction".

The above is my understanding, and the content does not represent absolute correctness. If there are any mistakes, you can point them out. Thank you!