I got high marks in my composition when I was a child, but I couldn't write an article when I grew up.

Transferred from his official WeChat account of the same name?

Today I want to talk about writing articles (or public writing).

Facing the defects that I don't want to admit, I can't let go of persistence.

Writing an article is nothing more than six words-putting facts and reasoning.

Still four words-there is something in the words.

When I first learned composition, the teacher often said so.

Even in the self-media era, the essence behind countless popular articles remains the same.

"The bench will be cold for ten years, and the article will not be empty."

This sentence is also often used to persuade students to be pragmatic in their studies.

In short: once you start writing, remember to say it.

However, in order to be lazy, I seem to be more accustomed to writing in vain.

After all, it takes a lot of brains to write a rigorous and credible article. Just a beautiful combination of words and sentences is obviously easier.

For example, for example, the composition questions in the Chinese exam.

It is often easy to examine prose narrative, which can get high marks and is occasionally used as a model essay;

Examining argumentative essays is hard thinking, plain play and nothing new.

Unless forced by exams, you will not deliberately exercise your critical thinking ability in your daily life, but will instinctively avoid importance.

I often think that if I was born in the age of examination, the strategy must be nonsense and too far from reality.

Because of my lack of experience and observation of personnel, my mind is really empty, and I can't say sharp points and express delicate feelings.

Extreme sensitivity to the micro-world may be desirable, but it is too self-centered to share.

But if words can't be spread and shared, it will only be meaningful to itself, and it is difficult to produce other values. In that case, it's just entertaining yourself.

Unless a person has achieved something in the field of writing, no one is interested in understanding your "over-ego" part.

This order is generally impossible to reverse.

In view of this problem, there is no reason to let it go, is there?

But I just let it go.

I am not a great writer who will remain immortal. What's wrong with the article? And I can cope with every exam composition, and my score is not low.

This relaxed state of mind actually collapsed in college. Because the university has to write a thesis.

You can't continue to write essays, can you?

However, what can I say? I haven't written many papers left by my teacher, but most of them are patchwork-after all, in the Internet age, there are more opportunities to be lazy.

Have no serious attitude towards study. Admit it no matter how embarrassing it is.

It is time to really realize the importance of writing articles in this era-it may always be important, but personal experience is more profound.

After years of examination, the application is always barely qualified.

It's not that I haven't attended a training class, nor that I haven't studied hard. It's just that my inertial thinking is stubborn and it seems that nothing can be changed.

In addition, there was an inexplicable resistance to "routine writing" in the early days. During the exam, I even thought that writing this word was too fake to write at all ... obviously, it was childish.

Of course, this is a cognitive error.

The reason why many training institutions have summed up a certain routine framework is mainly to facilitate students of different levels to master basic writing methods and basic grading methods as soon as possible, so as not to write blindly without any rules.

But the essence is by no means to let people directly apply templates to write.

Because, although there are routines to follow in composition, a truly excellent composition will never become a pure routine, but often an extension of the routine. This applies to any text.

But in any case, it may be that I am too lazy to practice deliberately, and finally I can't learn anything and give up decisively.

Articles with rhetoric but no profound core can only be endured in the student days.

Articles recognized by the general public are often practical, that is, they can provide certain value. Whether it's gossip entertainment, ideological inspiration or practical experience. After all, see what you can get.

In addition, more importantly, truth can move people's hearts.

I wrote a spring outing in primary school, because I really experienced it, so I wrote it vividly.

It's hard to write about quarrels now. Why?

Inexperienced, you can observe.

But what if you have no interest and enthusiasm for people and things and the whole world?

Reflected in the text, it is: lack of authenticity. Whether it is real daily life or real emotion, the output text always has a certain degree of affectation. If not, you will be upset.

Speaking of it, the "mourning" culture has become popular in recent years, and the group of "life without love" has grown stronger and stronger.

The attitude of hard work is too different from the painting style of Buddhism, but it is easy to become different.

Many people's mantra has become "casual", "casual", "casual" and "casual".

But whether it really doesn't matter, I don't know, I can only talk about myself.

Closing yourself is often equivalent to strengthening yourself. So, it's hard to see things outside of yourself.

Others will advise you to come out, get in touch with the outside world and don't pay too much attention to yourself. But the power of language is not so powerful. Whether you can go out or not always depends on whether you want to be meaningful or not.

You see, this is a worthless article. Because only writing about individuals is not universal, it cannot provide reference value for others. You're not a great person. Why do people care what you think, right?

Therefore, if you are going to write in public, for example, if you want to be self-media and gain attention and traffic, the article should basically meet the general expectations of the public. What you want to strengthen is your personal brand (the official WeChat account of your personal agent, etc. ), and what you want to weaken is your personal label (your emotions as a single individual, etc.). ).

You see, I know what a valuable article is, but it is difficult to write it.

Because it's not exciting.

Occasionally, there will be articles with substantive content, which can only be because they are really moved.

I often emphasize with my friends that this number is "full of personal emotions" as described in the introduction, and it is a XX space. Don't expect the article to provide any value.

In fact, it can be said that it may be just to avoid making a fool of yourself, but to make a defensive gesture cunningly first.

Refuse first, declare first, you have no reason to judge me, do you? Nowadays, stars are so used to being black, that's all.

Although the original intention of opening the number should be to write in public, because of the lack of message function and no sense of interaction, the essence has become a daily existence of recording.

Seeing the friends here, you probably understand what this article is saying, right? It doesn't matter if you don't understand, anyway, there are always some words to be sent out every day. Sometimes something is revealed, and sometimes nothing is revealed.

Everything is free, so free.