Whether the U.S. moon landing was faked or not will probably always be debated.

#American moon landing fraud # The conspiracy theory that the United States moon landing was faked has always been a hot topic on the Internet. I will also share my own views. I don’t want to rehash some so-called fake evidence, because whether it’s the waving national flag, different light sources, shadows of different lengths, films that are not afraid of radiation and high temperatures, etc., there are reasonable explanations, or these doubts , at least there is insufficient evidence.

1. Verification of the Apollo moon landing by the Chang'e Project

After China's Chang'e series achieved lunar exploration and orbited back, there were several more pieces of evidence questioning the U.S. moon landing. Let's take a quick look.

Evidence 1: The shape of the lunar lander's supporting legs and lunar soil. Whether it was Chang'e 3, 4, or 5, the metal legs of the lander were sunk into the lunar soil, but the American Apollo 11 lander seemed to have been placed on it. You must know that Apollo 11 The number is much heavier than the Chang'e series.

Of course, this doubt can be explained by the different thickness of the lunar soil in different areas of the moon and the different thrust of the recoil engines used by China and the United States to land on the moon. In fact, the legs of Apollo 14 that later landed on the moon There is a phenomenon of sinking into the lunar soil.

However, in the face of this explanation, skeptics believed that they realized this problem later during the studio shooting and made amends.

Evidence 2: The color of the lunar soil. The lunar soil collected by the Apollo project is all similar to cement gray in color. The lunar soil brought back by the Chang'e-5 sampling sample announced by my country is golden yellow. In addition, there is news that the lunar soil brought back by Chang'e 5 contains glass particles! It is 75% different from the American lunar soil.

This question can also be explained. This is mainly because the observation environments of soil are different. One is to observe with the naked eye and the other is to observe with a microscope. With the naked eye, the lunar soil brought back by Chang'e 5 is also cement dust. There are differences in soil, which can also be explained by the large differences in soil in different places on the moon.

Evidence 3: The photo is highly similar to some areas on the earth. Some photos of the lunar surface released by NASA in the United States are similar to the terrain of some places on the earth. For example, the photos taken by Apollo 17 are similar to those of dormant volcanoes on Hawaii Island.

The same problem also appeared in photos taken on Mars. Netizens found that the terrain photos of Mars released by the United States were similar to the terrain of Devon Island in Canada. At present, NASA has not given an explanation on this type of issue.

2. Some inexplicable inferences about the Apollo project.

What is really difficult to explain about the Americans’ manned moon landing are some logical inferences. There is actually no solid evidence to question the Americans’ landing on the moon. Most of the questions can be explained, and the ones that cannot be explained are mainly some logical inferences.

First, in 1969, when large computers and relay satellites were not invented, how did Americans achieve smooth live video broadcast? The video could be blurry, but smooth live broadcast is not easy to do even today. Yes, don’t you see that every time our country broadcasts a live broadcast of a rocket launching and throwing away the booster and fairing, the screen freezes.

Second, why was the Saturn V rocket with such huge thrust and such good reliability never used again? The explanation that the cost-effectiveness ratio is too high does not seem to fully explain the problem. More importantly, the Saturn V data was actually lost (and said to be destroyed) by NASA.

Thirdly, in 2002, an American host took out a Bible and asked Aldrin to press his hand on the Bible and swear that he had landed on the moon. Aldrin refused, and the host refused to give up. As a result, Aldrin punched the host directly before it ended. Beat him down (Picture 1).

In addition, an 8-year-old girl once asked Aldrin why no one is landing on the moon anymore? How do you think Aldrin responded? He actually said: How do I know, we haven’t been there either!

Fourth, the traces left by the Apollo project on the lunar surface can be realized even if no one lands on the moon.

The current mainstream questioning of the American manned moon landing is not to deny that the Americans did not land on the moon, but that there was no manned landing on the moon. Because all traces of the lunar landing left by the United States on the moon can be found. The question is, can these traces be realized without anyone landing on the moon?

3. Let the controversy remain in the fog of history forever.

Finally, let me tell you my opinion. To prove that the Americans faked the manned moon landing, there is still a lack of solid evidence. Those who support manned moon landings are real people, and the two questions they often ask are really damaging. First, there were more than 300,000 people involved in the Apollo program, why did they not raise any questions? Second, as the other side of the two Cold War powers, the Soviet Union did not raise any questions. Let’s leave these controversies to history, look forward to everything, and look forward to our flower growers’ manned moon landing.