My father-in-law is sick and is in the hospital. My mother-in-law doesn’t pay for medical treatment for my father-in-law. Is this right?

Such an approach is definitely wrong. If the mother-in-law has no money and does not have the ability to bear the cost of hospitalization, then it is forgivable. Without the money and the ability, then she must rely on Your children have to bear it, but you are unwilling to spend it before you have the funds. Instead, you force your children to bear it. This is wrong.

For this hospitalized person, the children do have their own obligations, but this person is also your husband and a lifelong partner. When he is sick and hospitalized, you must also have It is your responsibility and obligation to pay for treatment. This money is not only your money, but also belongs to your husband. It is very reasonable for him to spend this money when he is sick.

Of course, when your parents are unable to bear the expenses of the hospital, your children will definitely bear it. This is a responsibility that should be paid by each other, not just one person's responsibility. Is it true? Just because of the existence of the daughter-in-law, this family is no longer a family! She is your son's partner for the rest of his life, and she is also a family member. If you start calculating these things now, then what is the point of living such a life? It is all full of calculations and there is no sincerity in it.

So this approach is unreasonable. No one who really cares about his family can do this. I met a colleague at work before, and her mother-in-law was like this too. She and her husband paid all the expenses for her father-in-law's hospitalization. Her mother-in-law was unwilling to pay a penny. She felt that such a person was really unworthy of being a parent.