"The seamless connection of love is a long-planned betrayal", do you agree?

Personally, the seamless connection of love is a long-planned betrayal. Do I agree with this sentence? My answer is: yes and no, some people do. When they are together, they have already figured out who they want to confess to and who they want to be with after breaking up. This is considered betrayal. What they don't agree with is that some people don't like it, but they will find new objects after breaking up, not when they are in love. This is not betrayal.

Let's talk about the identity side in detail. Here, the descriptor is defined as a boy. If in a relationship, a boy has an affair with another girl, or is very ambiguous, or wants to chase after this girl immediately after breaking up, and wants to be with this girl. If it is this operation, it must be a long-planned betrayal. This boy will definitely wait for a suitable opportunity to mention something to the other party, and then immediately go to be with his ambiguous girl. In fact, this way has accumulated in my heart for a long time. Even when I break up with the other party, I will take some unreasonable actions, just to force the other party away, and then go with the ambiguous girl myself. This is actually not only betrayal, but also a little scum.

Let's talk about the side we disagree with. Some people can't say that this operation is betrayal. Some boys don't find new partners until they break up. When they fall in love, they don't start looking for new targets or prey. They don't want to abandon or get rid of the abacus in each other's hearts. After breaking up, everything is inappropriate, and eventually I will break up and start my own new relationship. Does this boy count? Love veteran? Or people who don't cherish their feelings will fall in love again and again. This is not betrayal. Betrayal has been planned for a long time

Therefore, the seamless connection of love is a long-planned betrayal, which can be roughly divided into the above two ways. I agree or disagree with this view.