The opening and closing remarks of the charity debate are as follows: Thank you.

Kindness is true kindness. First of all, we must understand that actions are guided by the heart. Actions can be divided into goodwill and non-goodwill. For example, I am enthusiastic about taking care of an old man without children. No matter how the seasons change, I will never change. This is a good thing, don't you deny it? However, I took care of the old man with ulterior motives-I wanted to please the old man, cheat his trust, and get his expensive inheritance after his death! Obviously, such a good thing is not true! Now people everywhere cheat money under the guise of saving lives. If you can't see the essence of the phenomenon, you will reverse black and white. Kindness-pay attention to personal inner cultivation and be compassionate. Even if there is no good deed for everyone to see, people with good intentions will not do evil, at least not harm others and society. Kindness is true kindness. I support the affirmative. I think kindness is human nature, and people with good nature will not be evil. And good deeds can be said to be people's good deeds again and again. People who do good can't guarantee that they will do bad things to hurt others at the expense of their own interests, just as drug lords hurt thousands of people in Qian Qian and then make money to help others. Do you think such a good deed is commendable? Compensate others with good deeds after they have done something wrong. This is just a helpless kindness. Is this good thing acceptable? Therefore, kindness is its foundation, and people with kindness are also kind. I believe that people who have the opportunity to be kind will do good things, at least not harm others or themselves. Kindness is a person who is really kind without kindness. He will not do good, and his actions will not bring good results. Yes, there are many people who do good deeds in society, and their actions are indeed the embodiment of doing good deeds, but we should not be deceived by some superficial things. The direct result of behavior is important, but the intention hidden below is more important. Therefore, without goodness, the goodness of behavior is not enough to show that it is really good. It's good to be kind. Kindness is really good, it is an instinctive kindness. It's impossible for a kind person not to do good deeds, even if it's a simple act of kindness, but he comes from the heart and doesn't need to return. And some good deeds are just a kind of good deeds, not from the heart, not from the heart, we must have a plan. Kindness is true kindness. First of all, kindness comes from the heart, from the heart and from the root. Good deeds can only be done with kindness. How can you do good without kindness? With goodwill, he will show it at the first opportunity. Consciousness determines action, and goodness has its own goodness. Secondly, true kindness is based on kindness, and kindness is a form of expression. Finally, isn't there false kindness in society? It seems to be doing good deeds, but his purpose and starting point is not to do good deeds, but to achieve some ulterior purpose, or for fame and fortune. His behavior is a kind of deception, hypocrisy and ugliness. However, his good deeds often hide people's eyes and ears, but they are not really good. Therefore, kindness is really good. I want to add a premise: goodness is true goodness. From a philosophical point of view, goodness includes "goodness", which is metaphysical and spiritual, while goodness is metaphysical and practical. In this way, kindness will inevitably lead to good deeds; A good idea is not necessarily like this. Kindness, good deeds/nausea and evil deeds are all restricted by society and its morality. However, from a philosophical point of view, moral standards are not necessarily based on established judgments, nor are they necessarily completely included in the rules of social morality. The reality of rapid change and development, people's measurement of morality can not be tied with social constraints. Morality should first be brought into the framework of personal conscience and life consciousness, and then it has the meaning of social recognition or not, thus forming a new moral norm. Therefore, we have to talk about moral issues. For example, if I see a woman carrying a heavy bag at the train station, I immediately want to help her carry it, but she refuses. It is this society that makes my kindness fail to be fulfilled in good deeds and makes me feel embarrassed; If I see an old beggar on the side of the road, I won't think much when I walk beside him. Give him a little and then walk away casually. I don't think of it as doing good deeds and accumulating virtue, but I think it should be comfortable. If kindness is regarded as a kind heart, it is true; If kindness is regarded as a kind of good idea, it is not true, because at least it has no metaphysical action, and most good ideas have been filtered out, while kindness from the inner conscience is often more direct, thorough, closer to reality and more in line with human nature.