How to use the spirit of utilitarianism to write a composition

1. Write a composition with the idea of taking it, with unlimited subject matter and unlimited words.

China Football Association has always been the so-called "behind closed doors". If you don't go, no one else will come. Since I broke the door to professionalism, I have hit a string of nails. Up to now, everything has become a "send away". If nothing else, just learning technology, someone went out long ago, from the earliest Gu Guangming and Chi Shangbin to sending the whole young Jianlibao to Brazil, the football kingdom at the beginning of professionalism, but finally "I don't know what will happen"; There are also several overseas players, such as Yang Chen, Li Jinyu, Xie Hui, Sun Jihai, Li Tie, Shao Jiayi, etc., who have taken the lead in European countries all the way and can be called "promoting national prestige". It is said that Dewey will be sent not far away. I don't want to discuss here what their exit has to do with improving football in China. In short, people who go out now are getting younger and younger. I dare say, it is a little progress.

But none of us said according to the etiquette of "reciprocity": bring it!

Of course, it is not a bad thing to give it away directly. A person is rich in knowledge, and a person is knowledgeable. Nietzsche boasted that he was the sun, just giving and not wanting. However, Nietzsche is not the sun after all, he is crazy. Neither is China. The level of football in China is not even as good as that in China. Can foreigners treat players from China as food? If it's food, the players who go out are pickles. Foreign clubs boast that China players have potential. They can't come up with anything, and the big names don't come, so they have to praise our players.

Don't misunderstand why this kind of reward is thrown away, that is, thrown away, or to put it mildly, it can be called "given away" I don't want to give an example here (in fact, Gaza in Tianma, Gansu is an example).

I don't want to say "send" here, otherwise it will not be "modern". I just want to advocate that we should be a little more stingy. Besides giving, we should also take it for the sake of taking it.

But we were scared by what we were given. First there are English football hooligans (China), gambling in Southeast Asia, and Italian black whistle (China Referee Association). In fact, this is precisely because it is "sending" rather than "bringing". I don't seem to want to say it here.

So use your head, open your eyes and get it yourself! (Lu Xun's original words. It is difficult for China football players with low quality to understand)

If you are lucky enough to learn Brazil (will China become the Brazilian team in Asia? ), or learn from Yugoslavia (will China become the Balkan eagle in Asia? ), if we don't make progress, the sample will be finished.

Anyway, we must take it with us. We want to use it, store it, or destroy it. Then, to learn from Brazil and Yugoslavia, we must surpass them and become our own. First of all, let us China football players be calm, brave, observant and selfless. Without it, you can't be a new person. Football can't be a new football without it.

2. The theory of material composition with the theme of "takenism".

Recently, I read a report that Jeff Chang Shin-Che Shen Che's new song involved plagiarism. After reading it, I didn't agree. I have always liked Jeff Chang Shin-Che Shenche's songs. There are many similar reports. For example, a while ago, it was reported that the songs of the Walters were also plagiarized, which caused a great sensation. Flowers have become more popular. Not only in the entertainment circle, but also in many circles. From Walter's point of view, I think the media can't say that Walter's songs are plagiarized, just like students copying their homework.

Mr. Lu Xun once said the way to get things. I agree with Mr. Lu Xun. You take other people's things, but you have to digest them yourself. You have to have your own things in it. Isn't that what FAW did? Hongqi took an Audi shell and a Nissan engine, which is our red flag.

Looking back at history, the four great inventions that we are often proud of were taken away and digested by foreigners, and the gunpowder inside was used to make bombs, which awakened the sleeping lion. We can also take them down, fight back, and then we will be ambitious.

Didn't Jing M. Guo also say that he copied other people's books? I also told Bo Gongtang that he didn't apologize. It is reasonable not to apologize. For example, when we copy other people's homework, we never say sorry to others. We should say thank you. Besides, I didn't copy it. Right?

But it really imitates other people's things, takes other people's things, we digest them ourselves and try different things. This is called innovation.

Think about it from another angle. For us, the meaning of survival has become blurred. Although I was in primary school, I recited the text every day. That's another person, muttering lofty ideals, the meaning of existence and the historical mission. But for people of our generation who have been stripped of their ears, blindfolded and sucked into their brains, they don't know anymore. If people had a hard time during the Anti-Japanese War, they at least knew the meaning of survival, which we sometimes didn't know in peacetime, so utilization and hedonism were brought into full play.

Sometimes after watching those TV shows in War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression, I really want to go to that era and vent my confusion. But when I looked in the mirror, I was surprised. I became distorted in the mirror and lost myself. Of course, I didn't mean to attack anyone. I just borrowed myself to say goodbye.

3. On the theory of composition "takenism" China has always been the so-called "closed-doorism". No one else is allowed to come unless he goes.

Since the door was broken by a gun, a series of nails have been hit. Up to now, everything has become a "farewell". If nothing else, I just sent a batch of antiques to Paris for exhibition recently. I don't know what will happen after that. There are also several "masters" holding several ancient paintings and new paintings, which are hung all the way in European countries, called "promoting the national light" [2].

It is said that Dr. Mei Lanfang will be sent to the Soviet Union to promote "symbolism" in the near future, and then he will go to Europe to preach. I don't want to discuss the relationship between Dr. Mei's acting skills and symbolism here. In short, living people have replaced antiques, and I dare say it is a little progress.

But none of us said according to the ceremony of "reciprocity": bring it! Of course, it is not a bad thing to give it away directly. A person is rich in knowledge, and a person is knowledgeable. Nietzsche [4] boasted that he was the sun, with infinite light and heat, just giving and not wanting.

However, Nietzsche is not the sun after all. He's crazy. Neither is China. Although some people say that digging out underground coal is enough for the world to use for hundreds of years, what about hundreds of years later? Hundreds of years later, of course, we will become souls, or go to heaven or go to hell, but our children and grandchildren are still alive, so we should leave them some gifts.

Otherwise, on the occasion of the festival ceremony, they get nothing, so they have to kowtow to each other and ask for some leftovers as a reward. This kind of reward should not be misunderstood as throwing things. It was thrown away. To put it mildly, it can be called "sending". I don't want to give an example here

I don't want to say "send" here, otherwise it will not be "modern". I just want to advocate that we should be more stingy, not only "send", but also "bring" for "bring".

But we were frightened by what was delivered. First, British opium, abandoned guns in Germany, then French gunpowder, American movies, and various Japanese gadgets printed with "completely domestic products".

Therefore, even sober young people are disgusted with foreign goods. In fact, this is precisely because it is "sending" rather than "bringing".

So use your head, open your eyes and get it yourself! For example, there is a poor young man among us who got a big house because of his ancestors' yin gong (let me put it this way), whether it was cheated, robbed, legally inherited or obtained as a son-in-law. So, what should we do? I think, first of all, regardless of the willy-nilly, "bring it"! However, it would be a shame to oppose the old owner of this house and hesitate to enter the door for fear that his things will be dirty; When you fly into a rage and set it on fire, you can save your innocence, but you are stupid.

But because I envy the old owner of this house, this time I accepted everything, jumped into the bedroom happily, smoked the remaining opium, and of course it was even more wasteful. "Usualism" is completely different.

He has and chooses. When you see shark fin, you don't just throw it on the road to show its "popularity". As long as it is nutritious, you can eat it with your friends like radish and cabbage, but don't use it to entertain big guests; When you see opium, you won't throw it into the toilet in public to see its complete revolution. You just send it to the drugstore for treatment, but you don't create the mystery of "while stocks last"

Only pipes and lanterns, although different from India, Persia and Arabia, can really be regarded as the quintessence of China. If you travel around the world with it on your back, someone will surely see them, but I think everything can be destroyed except sending some to museums. There are still a group of concubines who want to ask them to separate, otherwise "takenism" may be a bit dangerous.

Anyway, we must take it with us. We want to use it, store it, or destroy it.

Then, if the owner is a new owner, the house becomes a new one. However, first of all, this person should be calm, brave, discerning and not selfish.

Without it, you can't be a newcomer. Without bringing it, literature and art can't become new literature and art.

4. The 800-word composition about "Qu" in Modern Chinese Dictionary has a meaning: "The tools, materials and methods on which the introduction depends." With the meaning of "use". "Bring it", as the name implies, is to be good at bringing it and making use of it. In today's information society, how should we "take" and "use" all kinds of information from the outside world?

This problem exists because we are in an era of information explosion. Thousands of letters or numbers confuse our eyes and deceive our impulsive brains. This requires us to have a pair of unique "eyes" and be good at distinguishing.

For example, it is very necessary for us to spend a little wisdom on advertisements around us. An advertisement for a cosmetic claims: "It contains some ingredients that can completely remove facial wrinkles, and it only takes 10 days to improve the skin." The figures we see are very accurate, but "can improve the skin" is very vague. How credible is this figure? How did it come into being? This requires us to think objectively and rationally, selectively "take", and don't believe all the information in advertisements.

Around us, there are always all kinds of figures and charts, which are full of media. Because numbers always give people a real and concrete impression and confuse our brains the most. It is very important for us to have an eye for this golden land.

Not only advertisements, but also real people. People are animals with social attributes and exchange a lot of information in one way or another every day. In ancient China, there was a saying that "good things don't go out, bad things spread thousands of miles", which was often "spread from one word to ten, spread from ten to a hundred", which usually tampered with the information industry of things themselves, and it was very easy to be deceptive. Therefore, the trust of "Zhang's son …" and "Mrs. Li …" from the streets and neighbors is extremely low, which is often quite different from the facts, and some even just the opposite. We should screen this information rationally, and we should not let false and emotional things affect our correct understanding of people or things.

The same is true of knowledge. As students, we should persist in studying and acquire knowledge every day. No one is perfect, and teachers' views and opinions are not necessarily completely correct. Similarly, knowledge is constantly updated, and the truth and views in books are not completely advancing with the times. We should judge with our eyes, dare to question and guess boldly, and we should not just "take advantage" without reservation.

With a pair of "discerning eyes", how can I "use" things? This requires "Si Qi sees the sage, but does not see the sage and introspects". When we use "eyes" to distinguish, good and useful things should be absorbed and used well to make them our own. This is the essence of our "takenism". All kinds of advertising information, gossip, beautiful lies, teachers' opinions, theorems and axioms in textbooks are all the same.

In short, in real life, we should cultivate a pair of "discerning eyes", boldly "take", carefully distinguish and choose, then try to "use" and finally benefit from it.

5. How to write an argumentative essay also talks about "takenism" is another work of Mr. Lu Xun. In view of the Kuomintang's traitorous policy, some people's blind worship and westernization, and the wrong attitude of refusing to learn blindly from foreigners within the revolutionary cultural camp, he put forward a summary of boldly absorbing and learning from foreign cultures.

This paper skillfully uses the metaphor of "inheriting a big house" to clarify the truth of criticizing and inheriting cultural heritage. The local metaphor is also vivid and appropriate, using the' babbling head' as a metaphor for weak escapists; Cut off the nihilists who are blindly rejected by history with the metaphor of' faint eggs'; Use "waste" to describe a capitulator who worships foreign countries and advocates complete acceptance.

It is pointed out that the significance of the central theme is that we should use our brains, open our eyes, occupy everything, and adopt or use them, store them, or stop them, that is, absorb their essence according to their nature and usefulness to us.

The two sentences in the article are accurate and vivid, and some of them contain irony.

For example, 1. There are also several' masters' holding several old paintings and new paintings and hanging them all the way in European countries. Calling them "promoting national glory" is a kind of irony, satirizing nationalists' voluntarism and giving them gold on their faces.

In a word, living people have replaced antiques, which is a little progress, I dare say. Irony rhetoric is used to satirize people who send things from giving things to giving them away.

6. Who can write an 800 article for me on the topic of takenism? Neo-utilitarianism is the past tense, in exchange for neo-utilitarianism! In real life, we like to take it.

Humans are really kind. When others want to borrow money from us, we casually say, "Take it." ; When others ask us for help, we always "accept" ourselves happily.

When people enjoy the happiness of utilitarianism, they forget that there is new utilitarianism behind it. When we walked to the gate of the famous school, the score shouted at you, "Take out your score."

; We walked around the workplace, all looking for a good job, but the manager shouted at you, "Take out your diploma and experience." ; When an honest official wants to become a corrupt official, he scolds him in his heart: "Take out your conscience!" " "I'm really worried about whether the toilet will whisper to you when we walk in:" Take out * * *! "Nazism is like a ruler of ability, but it is also like a severe stick.

It lets you know how much you weigh and it will make you forge ahead! Napoleon wanted to enjoy material life when he was poor in military school. He also likes beauty, but he knows his present situation. When his classmates are enjoying life, he can only be forced to study hard and improve his ability.

However, this made the birth of a great man of the times. When he reached the peak of dictatorship, he spent money like water and treated it like dirt. He bathed in love, surrounded by beautiful women like clouds! When Cao Cao was determined to be a hero in the world since he was a child, people around him laughed at him-the eunuch's grandson. If only he wanted to be a hero in the world instead of a eunuch! He knows that he has neither ability nor "diploma" and can only be looked down upon. No one in society can sympathize with incompetent people! He knows the philosophy of materialism, so he made great efforts to study all kinds of books extensively, and eventually became the overlord of the Three Kingdoms, winning the eternal reputation of "being able to rule the world and being fierce in troubled times"! When people are in trouble, who doesn't want to live in a luxury villa, eat in a five-star hotel, drive around in a brand-name car, show off in a brand-name car, and be jealous of the beautiful women around them, but what's the use of everyone thinking so? If you want to be beautiful, you still have to face the boring life or cruel utilitarianism. Go straight ahead with the doctrine, people don't try to waste their youth! Even though utilitarianism is full of our life, it can really make us forge ahead, but relying on it alone is not enough. It is ourselves who play a key role! "Man can conquer nature" is an unchangeable truth, and fate is always in his own hands. Who can blame him for not working hard? No matter what difficulties you have, no one will help you selflessly. They all have their own purposes! When we succeed, we have many friends; But when I failed, my friend became "0"! Only improving your ability is king, and saving the world must first save yourself! When utilitarianism has become the mainstream, it is easy for us to say, "Take it!" .

7. I want to write an abstract composition, which is related to the discussion. How to write the content is necessary for acquisitivism.

Lu Xun's "takenism" is quite thought-provoking. "Takeism" said, "If you don't take it, you can't become a new person;

Literature and art can't become new literature and art unless they are used. "It is not difficult to see that you have to bring your own requirements for new things. At the same time, I think

Blind belt is bad. Therefore, utilitarianism needs an idea that dares to break through, which I call "dare to think".

Both utilitarian and dare to think. Because the "new" obtained in this way will not be single or even monotonous.

In other words, blind use has disadvantages and will give people a monotonous feeling. For example, the alien incident that has already made a lot of noise. The branch of academic or vocational research.

Scientists and alien experts have confirmed the fact that aliens exist. But most human beings who can't understand and accept it use teaching.

The "takenism" endowed by education questioned and criticized the alien incident. They also confidently said, what aliens? That UFO

This phenomenon has nothing to do with aliens at all, and UFOs may be as unknown as earthquakes and aurora in nature. For contemporary

I am really impressed by the proofs of these "takenism" people. Because they have rich knowledge, they can justify themselves. At the same time, sadly

It is their thoughts that are monotonous because they are blindly used. This monotony is actually the poverty of thoughts.

They don't use their brains, they continue to think deeply, they don't start making progress in investigation and research, but they bury the spirit of exploring scientific truth.

There are no wonders in the world, and there are no wonders. For the world, we just want to use "dare to think". Dare to think, we will be creative;

Dare to think, new things will break through new fields; Only by daring to think can we not stifle the rich ideas in the universe. This is also

"Takeism" is a must. We can't blindly pursue "takenism". The phenomenon that "bringing" can't be proved

It's nothing. It is conservatism. If you don't "dare to think", you have no chance to break through new fields at all, and you close your mind.

Become closed-minded Therefore, we should use the breakthrough spirit of "dare to think" to break the shackles brought by "takeaway".

Fewer and fewer people dare to think. Due to the disadvantages of exam-oriented education, the knowledge blindly brought by students gradually disappears.

The independence and creativity of their thinking are ignored, and what they "bring" will also be limited by the times. Even, they think "brought it"

It is summed up through "careful selection", which is foolproof and can prove everything and be unbreakable. However, how beautiful the world is.

Ah, knowledge is constantly updated. Don't think that "what have we brought" is irrefutable evidence, and don't think about things other than knowledge. Think about knowledge.

Besides, maybe if you "dare to think", you will find that "what you bring" is limited, and you will "dare to think".

"Dare to think" is actually the spirit of thinking, analyzing and summarizing innovation about things. "Dare to think" can break the routine, "Dare

Only thinking can seek new things and new ideas, and "dare to think" can also promote the discovery and development of new things. Of course, dare to think is not a delusion, but the need of "takenism"!

8. Lu Xun used this theory as material to write a composition. Why do you think it should be my own and want you to give it back to me? Such as technology, such as culture, such as experience. It's not that we don't have it, but that I'm not the only one who has it, so there is competition and innovation. I think this is the main purpose of Mr. Zhou writing this article. Since people have taken it and can't get it back, China people should recognize this, and then innovation can win. It is not shouting to prove that this technology or culture or experience first came from me, nor is it used to prove to the outside that we used to be a big country in China and comfort ourselves internally-we used to be a big country in China, and we pioneered this technology. ...

I am a little personal opinion, play by myself!