There are too many fights in the animal world, so there will be no such thing as human beings. People are moral, well-educated, and have their own ideas, so they can be benevolent. The next one is Tao

There are too many fights in the animal world, so there will be no such thing as human beings. People are moral, well-educated, and have their own ideas, so they can be benevolent. The next one is Taoism. Taoism talks about letting nature take its course, which just goes against Legalism. There are also benefits to letting nature take its course. Tao gives rise to one, one, two, three and three. This sentence also makes sense. Taoism talks about letting nature take its course. Nature has not been manipulated by humans, but has created us by letting nature take its course. Now. However, Legalism is another approach. It has strict control, resulting in the three-sided sword. It mainly talks about rewards on one side and punishment on the other. I'm sure others will ask for rewards, so raising the price also creates a high reputation. ? But this is not good. If this guy has legal sanctions, then if this is brought up, some people will think of what this person thinks. The society is actually relatively corrupt, but it is just internal corruption. The reason why I think this book is quite good is because it talks about the thoughts of each school, and then makes a comparison and final summary of the thoughts of each school, which I think is also better. If you ask what is good about it, the good thing is that it is rich and diverse and its interest is also very high.