What will gay love be like?

This is a normal phenomenon in the animal kingdom, not just humans.

The reasons for homosexuality are complicated:

Variation of natural sex hormones, particularity of growth environment, family influence, long-term depression or sex-induced evolution. But there is no doubt that homosexuality is only a person's sexual orientation and has nothing to do with disease, evil and metamorphosis.

In foreign countries, children can get gay education very early. For example, the textbooks for grades six and seven in the United States have a chapter about' rainbow children', which introduces homosexual intercourse. When boys and girls reach sexual maturity, teachers will also guide students to explore and establish their own sexual orientation-that is, to know whether they are gay, straight or bisexual. Strictly speaking, homosexuality can basically be considered bisexual.

American universities are gay and open. Homosexuality is also common in American elementary schools. Recently, Shen, the author of a best-selling book "I am Korean", described how he and his entourage Hong Haier verified a classmate's sexual orientation with a tape recorder at the US Air Force NCO School. The little boy who was tested turned out to be really gay, and he himself was harassed by a homosexual at the same school, which was very interesting.

In the west, the incidence of homosexuality can reach 10%, and even higher in some cities. Among homosexuals, 20% belong to spiritual homosexuality. Theoretically speaking, homosexuality in China should be around 10%, because it is human's physiological nature, but under the indoctrination of Confucianism in China, the mainstream civil society is unwilling to recognize this humanity. It is considered immoral, but I think it is immoral to discriminate and curb homosexuality.

Animal homosexuality refers to courtship or sexual behavior between adult same-sex animals. Scientific research shows that homosexuality exists not only in human society, but also in at least 130 species of vertebrates.

Experts believe that homosexual behavior is widespread in the animal kingdom.

The word homosexuality was put forward by German doctor Benckert in 1869, but homosexuality has long existed in society. In ancient China, gay men were called "the wind of masculinity", "the wind of Longyang" and "the addiction of broken sleeves", while lesbians were called "comrades" in modern times, and their gathering place was called "menstruation's home". In the west, homosexuality is more common. In ancient Greece and Rome, homosexuality was a normal phenomenon and was regarded as a more advanced way than heterosexuality. Since modern times, in western societies such as the United States, 30% of adult men have had homosexual behavior, while 10% of adult men mainly lead a homosexual lifestyle. About half of women are mainly engaged in homosexual activities. (Data from Encyclopedia Britannica). Although the data may be exaggerated, it reflects that homosexuality is no longer an individual phenomenon, and we should give it a reasonable decision and evaluation.

In the short historical journey of mankind, homosexuality has always existed, and the attitudes of various societies and countries towards homosexuality have not adhered to a point of view, either agreeing, acquiescing or opposing. Until today, the rationality and morality of homosexuality are still in constant debate. But no matter how the government and society treat homosexuality, homosexuality always exists. Before 1970s, American psychiatrists regarded homosexuality as a mental illness and classified it as a mental patient. With the more rational and scientific understanding of homosexuality, DSM-IV and ICD- 10 explicitly removed homosexuality from the diagnosis of mental illness. However, even so, prejudice and discrimination against homosexuality cannot be erased from people's moral concepts. The human rights and dignity, identity and status of homosexuals in the real society can not be guaranteed, or even destroyed for no reason. So far, there is no code that stipulates whether homosexuality is a reasonable behavior. According to the existing laws of our country, normal homosexual behavior will not violate the law. But does this violate our moral laws?

Homosexuality refers to sexiness and attachment to the same sex, and it is a phenomenon that sexual orientation points to the same sex. The definition of homosexuality helps us to think about its rationality scientifically. First of all, homosexuality refers to the relationship between the same sex, which is the meaning we can all grasp; Secondly, homosexuality is a kind of love, just like we talk about heterosexuality, which is a kind of love. Love (if not viewed from the traditional wrong point of view) is not only sexual impulse, sexual satisfaction and sexual pleasure, but also sexual intercourse. Therefore, we should not judge homosexuality by whether we have had physical contacts, but by whether we have feelings, just as we judge heterosexuality. Otherwise, we are talking about homosexual intercourse and heterosexual intercourse, not the ethical issues of homosexuality and heterosexuality. A clear concept will let us grasp the essence of the problem. For those same-sex sexual intercourse just for sexual satisfaction, just as we judge whether non-emotional sexual behaviors (such as rape and prostitution) between the opposite sex are moral and reasonable, we can reach a unanimous opinion, which is no longer within our consideration.

At present, there are three attitudes towards homosexuality: approval, opposition or neutrality. Most people are against it. The reasons for disapproval expressed by Mr. He in the article "Social Ethics Evaluation of Homosexuality" should represent the arguments of most opponents. He believes that homosexuality is impossible to be reasonable and moral in our country, because homosexuality violates the laws of nature and is an abnormal sexual behavior; It violates the law of human evolution and is a retrogressive phenomenon; Homosexuality deviates from the natural function of sexual behavior; Homosexuality has a great influence on the spread of AIDS. Opponents also believe that homosexuality will lead to some crimes; Homosexuality will have a certain impact on our society, family and marriage, which is immoral. However, if we think rationally on the basis of clarifying the connotation of homosexuality, we will find that homosexuality is only different from heterosexual sexual orientation, and the choice of sexual orientation is human freedom. Moreover, there is no difference between homosexuality and heterosexuality, and the same emotion can also get the pleasure and satisfaction of human sexual desire. How can we assume that heterosexuality is reasonable and moral, and homosexuality is unreasonable and immoral? The foothold of our discussion on this issue is not whether homosexuality conforms to the current social ethics, but whether it should conform to social ethics and what is the fundamental purpose of social ethics. Social ethics is a process of continuous development and perfection, and its fundamental goal is to achieve the greatest happiness of the greatest number of people. It is entirely possible and understandable to be cautious about some problems in its development, but this deviation and mistake must be corrected, which is the correct way to develop and improve ethics.

If we carefully analyze and reflect on these arguments put forward by Comrade He and his opponents, we will find that their views are one-sided and debatable and must be refuted in order to establish a correct and scientific attitude and concept towards homosexuality. The following is a detailed analysis.

1. Homosexuality violates the laws of nature.

For example, in physics, magnetic poles with the same name repel each other and magnetic poles with different names attract each other; Specific to the animal kingdom, it can be called sexual law. However, the inevitability of this law is questionable. There is no denying that there are many phenomena in nature in which the same sex attracts the opposite sex, but just because most cases are like this, it is not enough to rule out the existence and rationality of a few cases, which we can understand and admit. Comrade He also believes that this law is a function of the human body, an instinct of human beings, and is determined by instinct. In other words, this is the instinct of the animal kingdom, and the reason why human beings have homosexuality is entirely due to the acquired factors of human beings, and it is an activity in which human spiritual consciousness participates. However, modern research has found that homosexuality also exists in animals, but animals do not have human thinking ability, and their activities are carried out entirely according to instinct. Opponents may think this is an instinct of human morality. Ironically, if this statement can be established, we don't need to argue about the moral rationality of homosexuality here at all. Because if the opposite sex attracts and the same sex repels, it is human's moral instinct, and our moral concepts must be completely consistent here. Opponents such as Mr. He regard opposites attract and same-sex repel as natural laws, just because people always have such a tendency: to regard the situation of most people as reasonable, to regard the behavior of a few people as unreasonable, to regard heterosexuality as natural laws, and to exclude homosexuality is another manifestation of this tendency.

2. It is a retrogressive phenomenon to violate the law of human evolution.

Appropriate choice is personal spiritual freedom, and respecting personal choice is the real trend of social development. In today's advocating democracy and freedom, discrimination against homosexuality is a disrespect for individual freedom of choice, which is contrary to the spirit of our times.

3. The natural role of homosexuality in deviant sexual behavior.

. But homosexuality cannot achieve this goal. Indeed, sexual behavior has reproductive function, which is the unshirkable responsibility of human beings. However, we can't just regard people as tools for fertility. People are not born just to reproduce the next generation. The natural function of sexual behavior is not only fertility, but also sexual pleasure, sexual satisfaction and pleasure. Otherwise, people will be like animals. So rejecting homosexuality is as ridiculous as rejecting those who can't have children. Fertility is necessary, but whether a person's sexual behavior is moral or not cannot be measured by fertility. Just as most of us are right-handed, we don't deny that being left-handed is immoral and unreasonable. "Radish and cabbage, each has his own love." Allowing the use of left-handed people will not increase the number of left-handed people. Similarly, the legal existence of homosexuality can not reduce the number of heterosexuals, or even endanger human reproduction.

Controversy about homosexuality is inevitable. It takes a process for any scientific viewpoint to be generally recognized by people. In this process, there are fierce arguments and twists and turns of approval and opposition, which is the only way. At the same time, the ethics of our society is not a perfect and harmonious system. How to make social ethics keep up with the pace of moral truth correctly and realize its original purpose is a problem we should consider. With the in-depth study of homosexuality, people's understanding of it will become more rational and scientific, which in turn will inevitably make our social ethics more sound and perfect. In the process of pursuing human spiritual liberation, it will take some time to change people's one-sided and vulgar ideas, but dark clouds will inevitably obscure the light of truth, and it is only a matter of time before homosexuality will gain its due status, be recognized by society and be treated correctly.