How about poverty alleviation and relocation in different places? What about the old house and land?

We must think well about the relocation of poverty alleviation in different places. It is hopeless to continue living in the local environment to improve poverty or invest too long. After investigation and study, the relocation site will certainly achieve the goal of poverty alleviation. Please listen to the poverty alleviation projects arranged by government departments at any time. Is it necessary to care about the old house? Will it count to see if it has been moved or lost?

Poverty alleviation and relocation in different places is a government project, and it is also the government's concern and help for the people in poverty-stricken areas. The government's money to build houses in different places is also fundamentally helping people in poor areas solve their production and living difficulties. It is not only a good thing, but also a good thing once and for all! When relocating from other places, the government first builds the house and plans the cultivated land, or designs the projects to get rid of poverty and get rich in advance, providing water, electricity, ventilation and access, so that farmers who have moved from other places to help the poor can move in and live a normal life, farm, breed and get rid of poverty, but they can't get rich immediately, but they can also get rid of poverty and improve their quality of life. So what about the house and land in my hometown after the relocation? Relocation, housing, farming, the house is better than the original house, the original house can only be eliminated and knocked down, and the materials available in the original house can also be moved. The government will issue the house title certificate to the newly demolished houses, and the original house title certificate will also be invalid. The government will also give the land title certificate to the land allocated for poverty alleviation in the newly relocated houses, and the land title certificate of the original family will also be invalid. After poverty alleviation and relocation in different places, the house is a new house built by the government, which is 100 times better than the old house in my hometown. The land area will also increase and the traffic conditions will be convenient. The new living environment and new living conditions are much better than the old hometown. I can miss my old hometown, but I can't miss it, that is, the old one has gone, the new one has come, and the new life is about to start again. I wish the farmers friends who help the poor in different places have a new life. Thank you for your concern and support for the answers to the questions concerning agriculture, countryside and farmers, and welcome your comments!

The battle against poverty has started, and it is the wish of the party and the people. This year is also the most crucial year to win the battle against poverty. Throughout the country, Qi Xin has worked together to achieve a well-off society.

Everything should be viewed and analyzed from two aspects. Relocation in different places is a good thing for most families and the most effective way to get rid of poverty. The country has built a new house for you in the city, with complete water, heat and electricity. Both men and women can work to earn money, men can also work in other places, and women can work in factories, hotels and restaurants, which can really help families get rid of poverty and become rich. However, some single elderly people are now over 70 years old. They need money to eat, drink and cook in the city, buy a dish, a bucket of cooking oil and a bucket of rice noodles, but their monthly pension of more than 100 is not enough, and they have no ability to earn money. If you live in the countryside, you can collect firewood, cook in a pot, buy some rice flour oil and grow your own children's dishes.

According to the family situation, the countries that moved in from different places took corresponding measures. A good relocation policy can help poor households get rid of poverty quickly and arrange employment. The land at home can be recovered or planted by poor households, but there must be an agreement and it cannot be abandoned. Houses of poor households can be reclaimed as public houses in the village.

I think this is the way to ask questions. Welcome to share with friends. First, poverty alleviation and relocation in different places is a good policy for the party and the government to benefit the people and help them get rid of poverty. The broad masses of the people sincerely thank the party and the government. China is a big agricultural and peasant country with different natural and geographical conditions. In some areas, the ecology and natural environment are not suitable for living, let alone getting rich. Second, in recent years, high-level officials have paid great attention to agriculture, rural areas and farmers, especially farmers with poor living conditions. In the overall situation of revitalizing the rural economy, the central government promised not to let anyone fall behind on the road to a well-off life. Therefore, poverty alleviation and relocation in different places is a practical and good thing to help farmers get rid of poverty and become rich as soon as possible and live a happy life. Third, I asked, what about the original homestead and cultivated land? For old houses, people can deal with them themselves when they are gone. It is impossible to "move" the cultivated land together. Moreover, the ownership of cultivated land belongs to the country and the village where it is located, and individuals have no right to dispose of it. To sum up, the government has specific arrangements and plans for the life, production and development of poverty alleviation relocated households in different places.

Relocation for poverty alleviation in different places will help the relocated households get rid of the poverty environment, integrate into the economic construction of the relocated residence as soon as possible, start businesses under the guidance of local grassroots organizations, and increase production and income. As for the original house, it can be moved and sold. Everything is done according to your own human and financial resources.

Moving in different places, whether it is housing, medical care, environment, school, transportation, consumption, is definitely better than home! At the same time, there are two unfavorable factors: first, young people rely on working, regardless of land. It is very inconvenient for farmers who have no ability to earn money by working. Second, it is not convenient to eat your own pollution-free vegetables and your own eggs! In a word, by comparison, it is still more favorable than bⅰ.

Regarding housing, if the new house is built by the state, then the old house should be public. If you buy an old house yourself, you must protect it. Land, suitable circulation conditions are the best!

Relocation and poverty alleviation in different places is a part of the Party Central Committee's tough battle against poverty. It is a good choice to get rid of poverty and run towards a well-off society. The relocation of old houses in different places should follow the policy changes, and the overall demolition can be done. If you can't sell it, you can stay in your hometown. The key depends on the local development trend, right

Hello! Thank you for inviting me to answer this question: How about helping the poor in different places? What about the old house and land?

Since it is to help the poor in different places, the environment in the original place of residence may not be very good or it is difficult to develop the economy. For example, the original residence is inaccessible to roads and electricity, and the harsh living environment may be more prominent in natural disasters. In this case, the government may turn it into the object of poverty alleviation and relocation. Of course, whether it is necessary to move can be decided by the head of the household first. Since it is to help the poor, the state may allocate various infrastructure such as houses, roads, water and electricity. As for the life after the relocation, the government has considered it. For example, after the relocation, the original living standard can only be better, and the government will issue a minimum living allowance, or recover it according to the cultivated land country of the original address, and compensate according to the output value.

As for the cultivated land of old houses, it can be collected by the government according to the situation, and the farmers decide to retain the right to use it. All in all, it is a good thing to help the poor and resettle in different places. The country will help you, and you will struggle less for decades.

I have no experience in this field, so let's talk about my opinion.

My understanding is that the original place of residence belongs to a poverty-stricken area and it is not suitable to continue living, or the original place of residence does not have the conditions for poverty alleviation or is too difficult, so it can only be relocated.

I don't know if this understanding is correct.

I also saw the news of the relocation. The Three Gorges Dam, the South-to-North Water Diversion Project and even the new port behind my home have moved several villages. Some remote mountainous areas have moved to livable places, such as Qinghai and Xinjiang.

There are both positive and negative aspects.

Relocation, new homes are generally built, some people are satisfied and some people are not satisfied, I will not say subjectively, it is difficult to adjust.

On the negative side, I read a news that the quality of the new house moved for poverty alleviation is not good, and it has become a dangerous house before moving in. It's already been reported in the news.

If you encounter it, it will be very annoying. It feels worse than the old house. There will be a psychological gap and I feel cheated!

Whether it is good to help the poor and relocate easily, I think the difference is basically here. For an extreme example, move to Beijing, ok? There should be very few people who can't say it well, and most of them are old people who can't leave their homeland, right?

Nothing in the world can satisfy everyone, and what is in the interests of most people must be maintained.

This is my opinion.

Therefore, the starting point of the country's ex situ poverty alleviation and relocation is good, in order to help poor areas get rid of poverty and get rich and live a good life.

However, it is possible that some places did not do a good job in the implementation process, which led to the deviation of the national poverty alleviation goal, and some people even profited from it. This is a violation of the interests of the relocated households and an act of violating the law and discipline, and will be severely cracked down.

Leaving one's hometown is bound to be difficult to give up, and what will happen in the future will inevitably make people feel uneasy. Adaptation takes a process, but we should face the new life positively anyway.

The relocation of the country to help the poor is to lead and guide the masses to get rich, but the key is to fight hard.

This is the truth everywhere. It's better to live by yourself than by the weather. A happy life is created by oneself.

Come on, the future will be better.

1 If poverty alleviation and relocation in different places can help you get rid of poverty, then there is nothing to hesitate.

When I have money, I will double the house in my hometown. You are the most important thing now.

Is to get rid of poverty and get rich. That's the point. I hope it helps you.

Finally, you have to take it yourself.