The special chronology method for graduates, the "heavenly method", has aroused heated discussion. How did you finish your graduation thesis?

Graduation-specific chronology, which means that after the incident of HowNet came out, the degree of paper checking increased continuously, and it was pushed back after the first year. Of course, this is a ridicule of the majority of netizens. Writing a paper is not only related to repetition, but also the difficulty.

I remember writing a thesis when I graduated, because I studied management and economics, so I needed data. At that time, the teacher gave me two directions, one was case analysis and the other was empirical. The empirical one was very difficult, and logistic regression analysis and factor analysis were needed. Then you had to use a lot of databases to learn all these things by yourself, which was basically used by graduate students, and then you threw that direction away. Just to be a case analysis type, you have to find something for the case analysis type. You have to explain where your data comes from.

Therefore, the case study you choose must solve a problem to find data, and the data must be official, and the data published by a website is still incomplete. For example, if you want to find a company to go public, the company's financial statements are easier to find, but you need to find its P/E ratio, especially the P/E ratio in the past three to five years, which is not easy to find, so it is necessary to use many websites. Because Sina Finance was used more at that time, and then Guotai 'an database was used, because there were some data that could be directly exported, and it was convenient for those financial indicators to be used directly, and the accuracy of that data was beyond doubt.

then when I checked some data, I used the straight flush F1 and Wande, but Wande was very inconvenient. Later, I didn't use that thing, that is, I used a lot of data, because the sources of these data were diverse, and some data were incomplete on a website. Later, it was revised several times, and the teacher also said that if there were any problems in this area, you should correct them quickly, and then the data should be modified. Anyway, there were a lot of annoying things, but in the end, it was a stumbling, and it was finished, because the undergraduate wrote a paper. It was not easy for you to expect him to have too much innovation, just that all aspects were compliant.