Talking about going to the moon

# US moon landing fraud # US moon landing fraud conspiracy theory has always been a hot topic on the Internet. I also talk about my own views. I don't want to turn over some so-called false evidence, because whether it's flying national flags, different light sources, shadows of different lengths, films that are not afraid of radiation and high temperature, etc. There is a reasonable explanation, or these doubts, at least there is insufficient evidence.

I. Verification of Apollo's Landing on the Moon by Chang 'e Project

After the China Chang 'e series explored the moon, there was more evidence to question the US landing on the moon. Let's have a small plate.

Evidence 1: the shape of the support leg and lunar soil of the lunar lander. No matter Chang 'e III, Chang 'e IV or Chang 'e V, the metal legs of the lander were immersed in the lunar soil, while the lander of Apollo XI in the United States seemed to be erected. You should know that Apollo XI is much heavier than Chang 'e series.

Of course, this question can be explained by the different thickness of lunar soil in different parts of the moon and the different thrust of recoil engines used by China and the United States to land on the moon. In fact, the legs of Apollo 14 who later landed on the moon were trapped in the lunar soil.

However, in the face of this explanation, skeptics believe that this is because they realized this problem when shooting on the set and made up for it.

Evidence 2: Moon soil color problem. The lunar soil collected by Apollo project is similar in color to cement ash. The lunar soil brought back by the Chang 'e V sampling released by China is golden yellow. In addition, it is reported that there are glass particles in the lunar soil brought back by Chang 'e V! It is 75% different from American lunar soil.

This problem can also be explained, mainly because the observation environment of soil is different, one is with the naked eye and the other is with the microscope. With the naked eye, the lunar soil brought back by Chang 'e V is also cement ash. The difference of soil can also be explained by the huge difference of soil in different parts of the moon.

Evidence 3: The photos are highly similar to some parts of the earth. Some photos of the moon released by nasa in the United States are similar to the terrain in some parts of the earth. For example, the photos taken by Apollo 17 are similar to dormant volcanoes on the island of Hawaii.

The same problem also appeared in photos taken on Mars, and netizens found that the topographic photos of Mars released by the United States were similar to those of devon island. At present, nasa has not given a statement on such issues.

Second, some unexplained inferences of the Apollo program.

What Americans really can't explain about manned landing on the moon are some logical inferences. There is no concrete evidence to doubt that Americans landed on the moon. Most problems can be explained, but what can't be explained is mainly some logical reasoning.

First, when 1969, large computers and relay satellites were not invented, how did Americans realize smooth live video broadcast? Video may be blurred, but even today, smooth live video is not easy to do. Didn't you see that China's live-fire rockets get stuck every time they launch boosters and fairings?

Second, why hasn't Saturn V, a rocket with such huge thrust and good reliability, been used again? It seems that the cost-effectiveness ratio is too high to fully explain the problem. More importantly, the data of Saturn V was actually lost (even destroyed) by nasa.

Thirdly, in 2002, an American host took out a Bible and made Aldrin swear by it that he had landed on the moon. Aldrin refused, and the host refused to give up. Before the result was over, Aldrin punched the host directly. Shoot it down (Figure 1).

Besides, an 8-year-old girl once asked Aldrin why no one has landed on the moon now. Guess what Aldrin said? He said, how should I know? We've never been up there!

Fourth, the traces left on the surface of the moon by the Apollo program can be realized without landing on the moon. At present, the mainstream questioning the manned landing on the moon in the United States is not to deny that Americans did not land on the moon, but that they did not land on the moon. Because you can find traces of Americans landing on the moon. The question is, can these signs be realized without landing on the moon?

Third, let the dispute remain in the fog of history forever.

Finally, let me talk about my opinion. At present, there is no real hammer evidence to prove that Americans manned the moon and faked it. It is real people who support manned landing on the moon, and the two questions often asked are really lethal. First, more than 300,000 people participated in the Apollo program. Why don't they question it? Second, as the other side of the Cold War, why didn't the Soviet Union ask any questions? Let's leave these disputes to history and look forward to everything, and look forward to the manned moon landing in our flower shop.