Rational discussion! Is Curry a super giant? Or a superstar? Or a star?

Whether Curry is a super giant has been debated for a long time. I want to ask what is a super giant? Or what is the standard of super giant? There are "James, Durant, Leonard" who can be called the super giants of the current league. All three of them have led the team to the championship and won the FMVP trophy themselves. If we expand the scope of super giants and win the MVP in the regular season, then Harden, Brother Alphabet and Shao Wei should also be considered super giants. If we expand the scope of super giants, can we also include Brother Thick Eyebrows, Lillard, Butler and Owen in terms of personal ability and critical moment ability?

Looking back on Curry's career, it seems that at first people didn't think Curry could achieve such high achievements. A few years before he entered the league, many fans didn't know who Curry was, but the arrival of Cole changed all that. Under Cole's tactical system, Curry gained more room for development, and the team gradually became Curry's team. The achievement of three consecutive championships in five years has been remarkable. Although many people think that Curry won the championship by star players, although Curry didn't get FMVP, although many people now question Curry's ability to lead the team, we can't deny that Curry has changed the development trend of basketball and changed the way of playing basketball. Isn't a man who changed the league a superstar?

In terms of honor, Curry can also rank among the super giants. Curry won the regular season MVP for two consecutive years. How many people in NBA history can win two regular season MVPs? Some super giants have never won it in their whole lives, some super giants have won it once, but Curry has won it twice. Let's start with three champions. Some super giants may never play in the finals, let alone win the championship. Although Curry didn't get FMVP, it still doesn't affect that he is a superstar.

Curry's main personal honors:

14- 15 season champion (Golden State Warriors)

16- 17 season champion (Golden State Warriors)

17- 18 season champion (Golden State Warriors)

14- 15 Most Valuable Player

15- 16 Most Valuable Player (MVP)

13- 14 season all-star starter

14- 15 season all-star starter

All star starter

16- 17 season all-star starter

17- 18 all-star start

18- 19 all-star start

15- 16 season scoring champion

15- 16 season thief king

09- 10 Best Rookie Team 1 Array

13- 14 team of the season 2

14- 15 team of the season 1 array

15- 16 team of the season 1 array

16- 17 team of the season 2

17- 18 team of the season, the third team

18- 19 team of the season 1 array

POM data of April 20 13

POM data of April 20 14

20 14 1 1 POM data

20 15 1 1 POM data

20 16 POM data in February

20 17 0 1 POM data

20 18 0 1 POM data

In fact, I personally think there should be no objection to the topic of whether Curry is a super giant. If Curry can't reach the standard of super giant, how many people can reach Curry's level and reach the standard of super giant throughout NBA history?

There is only one system player in my library, but I have turned you into a super giant and run around.

Not only a super giant, but also an epoch-making super giant. The man who broke the most crucial era of powerful center in the past is Jordan, the god of basketball; Let people know how terrible O 'Neill is in Invincible.

Curry made everyone understand 2*0.5 3*0.4.

Look at the proportion of three-pointers in the attack now, and look at Popovich's promotion of the Spurs' tactics. With the continuation of this era, Curry will only become more and more great.

It is irrational to ask such a question, so what rational discussion is there?

Curry is a super giant, of course. There is no doubt that he is a super giant. The first three-point shooter in NBA history, two consecutive MVPs, and one of the absolute cores of the Warriors' three consecutive championships in five years.

Curry's rise led to an era of NBA. At present, his historical ranking is basically equal to Durant's, ranging from 14 to 15. The NBA is close to 80 years old and ranks in the top 20. Does anyone believe that it is not a super giant?

Many people like to take advantage of his downturn at the beginning of the season and think that he is not as single-minded as Jordan Kobe James. But it ignores that players' ability, state and psychological maturity are dynamic. So I have always stressed that players should be discussed in stages. Many theories like to graft a player to another year, which is sometimes ridiculous.

We often look for swords unilaterally, and then say that players are not good on the other hand and the ceiling is not high through their performance. But the same technique, different mentality, different playing effects; It is completely different to show it in different physical States.

For example, LeBron's performance has been maintained for many years. On the one hand, technical improvement is the most important, and his physical fitness has been at the peak of the league. Of course, this is related to his self-discipline, exercise and maintenance, but the most important thing is his talent: including no major injuries, dynamic athletic ability, static physical state and the talent to maintain this athletic ability for a long time. There are many talented athletes who will know what it means to be at a loss when they reach a certain age.

As for Curry, I think he has proved himself. 16 it is not an exaggeration to say that history is the first in the regular season. He may not be a single player, because the Warriors themselves have gradually matured as a system. Green's defense and tandem, Thompson's no-ball and defense are all important to the warriors.

It's just that Curry is the absolute core and the key to the rise of warriors. The seriousness of Curry is definitely not just talk. As for Curry, the decline in physical fitness will have a greater impact on him than the average player, but no one is not affected by the decline in physical fitness.

And his physical fitness can reach that height, which is the limit that a player with his physical condition can reach. Curry's current historical ranking is around 15. You can look at the top 15 players. There are not a few players whose dynamic and static talents are worse than his.

There is no denying that Curry is a superstar! If Curry is not a superstar, how many people in the nba have reached Curry's level?

Anyway, all three champions defeated the first person in history? If he is not, then he can prove that the first man in history is false.

Personally, I don't think Curry can be regarded as a super giant when he takes it out alone, but in the warrior system, his influence on the small ball era can be regarded as a super giant!

Rational answer to you:

Curry is an NBA player, ranked seventh in the first round in 2009, the most valuable member of two consecutive MVPs in the NBA regular season, the only unanimous MVP player in NBA history, the first scoring champion in the NBA regular season, and the triple champion in the NBA finals.

So Stephen Curry is a superstar player.

Lebron james is a superstar player.

Kevin durant is a superstar player.

James harden is a superstar player.

Westbrook is a star player.

Kai-fu Lee's guidance is: superstar players.

Chris paul is a star player.

Blake Griffin is a star player.

Brother Xin is: a star player

Leonard is a superstar player.

Davis is a great player.

Kobe Bryant is a great player.

Michael Jordan is a super great player.

It must be Curry. There was a double attack. Curry emptied Durant's basket. Is there a double attack on Durant's shot in Curry?