Which is more practical than Canon 2318 and Minolta 184? Specifically, talk about the service life and practical functions of Minolta 184! Urgent! ! ! ! ! !

I do maintenance. Based on my personal experience, I recommend you to choose Minolta Bizhub 184.

Explain the reason:

184 is an improvement of the previous generation 163 series, and the whole machine is smaller, but its functions have not been reduced (the same printing, copying and scanning are combined in one). With TN117 toner, the print run is about 1W, and the service life of the toner cartridge is 6, ~ 8,. The stability of the whole machine is quite good, with a monthly load of 5, pages (in fact, even tens of thousands or even tens of thousands of pages can be printed every month). At present, the price of the whole machine 184 is about 4,2 yuan

Besides, the price of Canon IR 2318 is 5,8 ~ 6,5 yuan (slightly different from place to place), and the consumption of toner is relatively high. Consumables are relatively expensive; In addition, Canon IR 2 series photocopiers have a fatal weakness: the fuser uses heating sheet and fixing film

(if you know something about photocopiers, I think you should know that no manufacturer except Canon will design it like this. The combination of heating film and fixing film is still possible if the print run is small; If the print run is a little larger, the fixing film will wear faster. I have replaced the fixing film of two Canon copiers this year, and one of them even printed only 3W copies.