Should thieves be responsible for the theft of electric cars and toxic peanuts under their seats?

The electric car was stolen, but the poisonous peanuts and thieves under the seat were poisoned. Let's start with criminal responsibility. Lawyers believe that it will not constitute a crime of negligent death. Because the owner could not or could not predict that the thief would steal the poisonous peanuts under the seat of the electric car, the case was an accident and the owner was innocent.

The reason is very simple: China is one of the countries with the best public security in the world, and citizens will not take preventing thieves as their normal thinking in their daily lives. Don't always think about what to do if the thief "patronizes"

If the court finds that citizens should be able to predict that thieves will steal cars, then lawyers feel that this is a denial of the decades-long efforts of the entire judicial organs, especially the public security organs, and an encouragement to thieves to steal.

Let's talk about civil liability. According to the provisions of China's civil law, such compensation should be based on the principle of fault. Is it the owner's responsibility to put poisonous peanuts in a locked battery car? Obviously not. The thief's stealing behavior is illegal and criminal, and it is also a fault. The owner does not need to bear civil liability.

Extended data:

What happened:

On the morning of March 8, Yantan Branch of Public Security Bureau of Zigong City, Sichuan Province issued a "police emergency reminder" to remind thieves not to eat peanuts under the cushion of battery cars by mistake to avoid accidents.

It turned out that ginger soaked two bags of peanuts with rat poison in order to poison mice. At the time of the incident, the car was parked in an empty parking space, the battery of the battery tricycle was stolen, and two packs of poisonous peanuts were also stolen.