"NANA" is still excellent even now. Is it because of its good painting style?

The development of animation is often accompanied by many difficulties, but people's fears have overcome a series of difficulties. Animation is a new way of expression for most people, from comics to animation (that is, moving pictures) to animation. Development should cater to the public's aesthetics and get rid of the unique style of animation. Any era is accompanied by the journey of animation.

But in this era, animation has become something that most people can accept. Maybe the early animation was just for watching. However, at this stage, we discuss the understanding of the meaning and depth of animation, so it can be the first choice for everyone. But there are many choices among others. Animation is not to change its essence to cater to a specific group, but to make everyone accept and accept it, which is correct.

NANA TV series

The topic began when NANA announced the adaptation of TV series. In fact, there have been physical blooming events before. If analyzed here, there will be another history of animation director, but in the attention of the public, what is really worrying is not that I hope not. This is a new problem. About animation, everyone's voice is similar. NANA has a complimentary voice and attitude. But talking about adaptation is derogatory. It started when TV programs didn't appear. Then this question is also very simple. Because this is, after all, a work that brings you a "perfect" feeling in your childhood memory. The director's physical difficulty is to restore the picture. Anti-human settings often appear in animation. It won't appear in reality. That's for sure. That's what everyone values.

It's easy to find two girls with completely different personalities, but generally speaking, the plot of animation gives us an exaggerated and imaginary feeling. Although it is adapted from reality, is it a joke to restore this hypothesis to two-tier hypothesis? Of course, there have been successful examples in the past, but imagine Japanese exaggerated acting skills for animations that are biased towards this daily style. Of course this will not be allowed to happen.

Abstract: It is not defined from the beginning to get people's belittling through the adaptation of NANA. People have never seen a perfect restored work before, which is equivalent to destroying people's dreams. There is no 1% success, and of course there is no 1% failure.

The realistic factors facing the adaptation of TV series by animation are here, and we can think of them as realistic factors. When the original cartoon or animation is published for the first time, people should also be clear when watching the animation. None of these things exist. However, if some life information and realistic factors are exposed one by one in large and small places, then let's reconsider these with real objects. Nature is also unrealistic.