Deputy-level cadres joke

First of all, the subject must be clear about two things, the first is the nature of the organization, and the second is that personal identity and organizational attributes are two concepts.

There are several organizations with different nature and different treatment. At present, there are two kinds of institutions. One is to divide it into "institutions managed by civil servants" and ordinary institutions according to whether they participate in public affairs or not.

In the Party History Office and other institutions, most of the staff are civil servants, and the wages and benefits are managed according to the civil service system, but the establishment attribute occupies the career establishment.

Ordinary institutions, such as the Food and Drug Administration, account for a small proportion of civil servants and are classified as career departments.

One is divided into "full supply", "poor supply" and "self-supporting" according to the degree of financial supply.

At present, with the institutional reform of public institutions, the secondary division method is not rigorous enough.

Therefore, it is very beneficial for your future planning to find out the specific nature of the organization you are going to, as well as the personnel structure within the unit, such as personnel identity and staffing ratio.

After the individual position of the deputy-level cadre managed by the organization department is promoted to the deputy-level cadre, it is placed under the rank of the deputy-level cadre managed by the organization department, and the personnel transfer is subject to the organization arrangement.

However, to some extent, with the implementation of the latest civil servant law, organizations are more rigorous and cautious in managing cadres with civil servant status, and will pay attention to the comprehensive consideration of personal wishes, identity categories and unit attributes. And try to avoid mixing personnel and positions, which will eventually lead to management confusion.

You can't have your cake and eat it. If conditions do not allow, the problem is mainly based on personal wishes and long-term development. Which is more important, cadres at the metre level or civil servants? After all, there is still a gap between civil servants and civil servants in terms of salary and rank.

It depends.

After working for a long time, civil servants can at least mix a chief clerk when they retire, that is, they can enjoy the official treatment.

The deputy department level of a public institution depends on whether the unit is a deputy department level unit, and whether it can be the top leader and legal representative when it goes.

If there is really no hope of promotion in the civil service, it doesn't mean you can't come. The metre position is also an official.

However, it is very, very difficult to upgrade the career establishment management from level 8 (deputy department level) to level 7 (main department level), and the general management of level 7 will be over.

In addition, from civil servants to career editors, the monthly car allowance is gone, and the salary for the thirteenth month is gone. The basic salary is lower than that of civil servants, especially after the ranks are parallel, the treatment of civil servants and career editors is more open.

Good wishes!

It must be inappropriate. The wages and benefits of civil servants are much better than those of public institutions. With the increase of salary, there will be more in the future. Administrators used to be professionals. No matter from the perspective of salary and welfare or personal future development, career staff are much worse than administrative staff.

It is not worth the big wage gap between the deputy department level and civil servants in public institutions. There is a big difference between now and after retirement.

Not cost-effective. Now the civil servants are in parallel, even if you stay for a long time, the treatment will only get higher and higher. In the absence of professional titles in public institutions, the retirement of civil servants will be 10 thousand times stronger. Don't say anything if you want to be a leader. After several years as a civil servant, you haven't been promoted, and you still need a good leader. If someone supports you, maybe one day you will have a chance. It's still very good for the civil servant's four-level chief clerk to go all the way up. Minor courses in public institutions are difficult in small places, but easy to experience in large places. However, in any case, the waist is not as hard as that of civil servants. Well, one is a regular army and the other is a puppet army. This is a psychological effect. In short, it is not recommended to transfer to the deputy department level of public institutions.

Normally, you don't have to go. If the position is really important and you can exercise to improve yourself, you might as well give it a try. But I want to return to the civil service. It may be difficult.

Can't do

Not appropriate.