Is the top three coaching changes in Guoan League a myth or a joke?

I don't think this is a myth, nor is it necessarily a joke. This is a vicious circle. The former coach was dismissed directly because of three consecutive defeats. Although I have won many games in the league before, it is not counted in the merits. After losing three games in a row, he was mercilessly fired. The new coach will understand that he may be fired at any time anyway. Such an operation will double the pressure on the whole team. How can he get better under such pressure?

We know that the game depends on the cooperation of the whole team, and the losing streak cannot be attributed to the coach alone. It is a very bad strategy for the team to change the head coach at this time. Last season, I knew that Bakambu loves to spit out cakes. Why did you decide to change people before the summer transfer period? There are also injuries to players that have an impact on the game. Why change coaches?

I think the first countermeasure that should be thought of at this time is to replace foreign aid. Guoan's defense and control ability are good, but the difference is that forwards and centers score less. If there is a new strong center to join, I think Guoan's strength will be greatly improved and the coach will be more flexible in the tactical arrangement of the team. But I never thought the coach would be changed. It's incredible.

I think the fundamental problem that Guoan wants to solve is not to change coaches, but to form the team itself. It is necessary to find the real reason for the losing streak, instead of directly changing the pot or letting the team's managers constantly change measures because of some interest relationship, so that Guoan will not have the hope of winning the championship and is likely to continue to collapse in the next time.