Reasons for the overthrow of evolution

Darwin's theory of evolution, which is all the rage, advocates that all animals evolve from low to high, and even thinks that human beings evolved from apes. Since his book The Origin of Species was published in 1859, it has won the approval of all walks of life and even been written in textbooks, so that people's belief in God was shaken at that time and the theory that God created man was just a myth. However, in less than 5 years, this theory has been untenable: First, there is no process of monkeys changing into people in paleontology < P > If people are monkeys, or as Dr. Lancaster said, "it is a kind of semi-upright ape that is not strong." Then we should find the stages of monkey becoming a human in the skeleton fossils. But the facts tell us that there are only human and monkey remains in the skeleton fossils, and there are no bones or fossils that look like apes and non-apes, like humans and non-humans. China's Yuanmou ape-man and Beijing's caveman are just apes. So far, there is no evidence to prove that they have human characteristics.

Second, the blood structure of human blood is different from that of monkeys

Scientific tests have proved that human blood of all races are exactly the same. But monkey blood is completely different from human blood. This proves that people and monkeys are not of the same blood. Therefore, patients can't use ape blood for blood transfusion, or they will die of spasm. White people and black people are still of the same descent. Not black people evolved from monkeys, but white people evolved from black people. People can stand upright and have long hair, but apes don't.

Third, from the point of view of fertility principle

There is a highest principle in biology, that is, although different kinds of animals cooperate, they cannot have children. Although horses and donkeys can be mixed to give birth to mules, mules can't give birth again. People and monkeys can't have children together, so monkeys and people are not the same species. But if whites cooperate with blacks or people of other colors, they can not only have children, but also have smart and healthy children. Children can continue to have children.

Fourth, no living thing can change each other

A cat can't change into a dog, and a dog can't change into a chicken. There are thousands of kinds of insects, birds and animals, fish and shrimp, and none of them can be changed into something else. Every living thing has its ancestors, as the Bible says, "God made everything according to its kind." Not only animals, but also plants, peaches can't become plums, and plums can't become apricots.

Dr. Israeli Qi, an expert at the British Museum, once said, "There is nothing in this great museum that can prove that biological races can be changed! The so-called "fossil man" does not exist. " He added: "This museum is full of evidence that it is wrong to say that opinion!"

5. Acquired changes cannot be inherited

Organisms are affected by the environment, and their body characteristics can be changed, but they cannot be inherited. Dr. Huishiman once experimented with mice, cutting off the tail of each generation of mice and chopping them for 19 generations in a row. The twentieth generation of mice not only had tails, but also had the same length as their ancestors. After many generations of foot-binding, the girl born will never get smaller. Acquired learning can never be inherited, which is the law of heredity. Therefore, apes will always be apes, and it is absolutely impossible for future generations to become people because of environmental changes.

VI. From the perspective of biological survival

If the theory of biological evolution exists, why is the life of animals and plants still the same as before, without any progress? Birds still hold grass as nests, lay eggs and hatch chicks, bees still collect flowers to make honey, and sea otters still build dikes to prevent water: only human science and technology change with each passing day and often make progress. Apes can become people, and people with such progressive ability can evolve into special people. Can you find someone special? There is an impassable gap between the lowest-energy savage and the cleverest monkey. No scientist can find out what the bridge is.

human beings are not evolving, but degenerating. According to Adam, the ancestor of mankind, he can manage all kinds of birds in the world, all kinds of animals on the ground and even all kinds of fish in the sea, and he can remember their names and call them. There are only one kind of insects, and there are 3 thousand names. Can you name a hundred kinds of insects today? Among the descendants of Adam, there are skills in inventing musical instruments and tools and building towers, big cities and ark. It can be seen that human beings before the flood were full of intelligence and great skills. In ancient times, people's physical strength was very developed, but now people's physical strength is getting weaker; Morality is also deteriorating day by day, that is, intelligence is far worse than before. Morality, intelligence and physique have all degenerated. Of course, some people have objections to the section of intelligence degradation, and put forward scientific inventions as evidence. This seems reasonable, but on closer study, it is not. The so-called scientific invention is nothing more than making use of the painstaking efforts of ancient people, adding a little and changing a little. It is all built on the foundation established by thousands of ancient people. It seems that if you add another layer to the already built ten-story building, or change a little pattern, this eleven-story building will be considered as your own creation. Therefore, it is not that today's people are more intelligent, but copying the inventions of ancient people for their own use. It's like the Wan Li relay race, but you can't run a Wan Li. If all the ancient books, drawings, instruments and samples are burned, can you make a plane? Can the next generation of human beings still invent submarines and atomic bombs? If modern people want to compare intelligence with the ancients, they must compare it on the basis of non-plagiarism. If you compare skills, art, fine arts, aesthetics, poetry and painting, music and articles, you will find that the intelligence of today's people is really not as good as that of the ancients! Biologist Sir Dasheng said: "The earliest remains of mankind tell us that the earliest period of mankind is his golden age." So we say for sure: human beings did not evolve from apes!

A few questions explain the theory that man evolved from lower animals, and some points are enough to confuse people:

(1) The survival order of all kinds of creatures on the ground, whether existing or fossils, has a certain level, which seems to be consistent with the theory of evolution.

(2) There are insignificant organs in the human body, such as cecum and coccyx, which seem to be organs left over from animals when they evolved into adults.

(3) The process of human embryo growth is similar to that of human evolution, such as fish, amphibians, birds and mammals.

(4) They have found the skulls of "Javanese" and "Beijingers" which are similar in shape to human beings and are said to be the heads of human ancestors. But none of these four points hold water.

For the first point, the Bible has told us thousands of years ago that God's creation process is from lower animals to higher animals. First make aquarium fish, then air birds, then land animals, and finally make people. We can't say that one evolved from another just because the order of survival is consistent. A carpenter can build a bench first, a chair second, and a table again. People can't say that a table evolved from a bench. These are just separate creations of different kinds.

As for the second point, the so-called waste organs left over from the human body, such as cecum and coccyx, have been proved by medical treatment. None of them are indispensable, not necessary for survival, but necessary for embryonic development. However, in the past, science was not developed, and it was mistaken for the waste organs left over by predecessors.

As for the third point, they think that human beings have found something like fish gills at the time of embryo, and they think that the evolution of human beings comes from fish. Although there was a time in the fetus when it was found to be like a fish's gills, it did not have the function of a fish's gills. After adulthood, it became a gum tongue, not a gills, but a throat. Furthermore, in the embryonic process, there is usually a heart first, and then there are blood cells. On the contrary, the hypothesis procedure of evolution is that lower animals have blood cells first, evolved into blood vessels, and then have hearts. This is an unrealistic guess.

Javanese and Beijingers don't have complete skeletons, but in different places, even in different ages, they found a few bits and pieces of bones, which are less than half of the skull, and they said that they were the bones of human ancestors. Is every piece of the skeleton found an ape bone plus a human bone? Or the bones of other extinct animals? Not yet. (They once found an extinct wild boar tooth as the skeleton of a primitive man. )

The so-called Javanese was discovered in 1891 by a Dutch doctor, Dubaya, in the Suro River beach in Java. There was only one skull, three teeth and another left thigh bone, which was also put together twenty yards away from the skull. Whether they belong to the same person is unknown. At the same time, there are 24 kinds of mammal bones mixed in the area. Scientists have different opinions. Some people say that the skull belongs to apes and the leg bones belong to people. In 1937, Du Boya himself said that the skull was an extinct ape and the cuboid bone belonged to a wild boar. Up to now, biologists still don't believe each other, and it's unclear. How can we say for sure that people are monkeys?

As for the origin of Beijingers, it is reported that it was discovered in the lime cave of Zhoujiaqi in the western hills of Beijing in 192s. Among many mammalian bones, "two human teeth" were found. After research, it is said to be "a species other than human" and tentatively named "Beijinger." Seven years later, I went to dig again and got another tooth. Compared with the teeth of chimpanzees and children, they are different in shape, so they are considered to be the teeth of primitive people and are "a new genus of hominids." After a second excavation, two skulls were obtained, one for a young woman and the other for a mature man. These patchwork pieces of bone with no evidence were excavated in different years and places. Biologists themselves still doubt or disbelieve, and even stand in the position of opposition to refute, how can we believe it?

scientific deception In 1911, a British lawyer and amateur anthropologist named Charlie Dawson found a skull in the place of Peldang, which was determined by some anthropologists as the original "British primitive." The scientific name is "Pyle Dangren." It is believed to be a human skull between 75 thousand and 95 thousand. In 1953, it was proved to be false by three scientists. It was forged by a pair of human skulls and an ape's gums.

Did people really change from apes? X

It was Dr. Oakley from the British Museum and professors Weiner and Clark from Oxford University who exposed the fraud. According to them, if bones are buried in the ground for a long time, a layer of fluorine will be produced on them. After careful analysis, the skull of "Perdang Man" is not rare in Europe: the gums are even more ridiculous, but those of a modern ape, who only lived to be ten years old. At that time, the forger skillfully painted a layer of paint to pretend to be an antique. One thing that evolution can't explain is that the white bear in the Arctic Ocean has long hair inside its sole. The sole of other animals has no long hair, but it is covered with long and many hairs; Why do you have long hair? Because if you live on the ice and run between the ice, if there is no long hair on your feet, you will slip into the sea. There are two problems here: first, who can predict that the prophet white bear will live on the ice, lest it slip into the water, and prepare long hair for its soles? Second, if the hair of the bear's paw is from nature, it is the white bear that moved from the mainland to the ice and gradually evolved into a mature one. Then, when the ancestor of the white bear moved to the ice, before the hair grew, didn't it slip and drown in the sea one by one? It seems that it is too late to grow long hair, and it has been extinct? Why are there white bears in the Arctic Ocean now? How do you answer this question with the theory of evolution? You can't answer unless you admit that God used his great wisdom and power to make it come into being according to his predestination. This is just as the Bible says, "God created everything according to its kind." Not because of the change of environment, it automatically changes into another category.

Darwin did two things:

(1) According to reality and ancient fossils, creatures were classified into fishes, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, apes and humans.

(2) formulate a theory according to the ideal, and say that people evolved from these animals in sequence.

The first job of Dartmouth is that it is proved by facts and scientific. In the second job, a line is drawn between all kinds of animals, and it is groundless to say that man evolved from inferior animals. There is a great difference between theory and law, and theory depends entirely on theory, but there is still a lack of facts. The theory is proved by facts before it becomes a law. The theory that Dartmouth's apes changed into human beings is just a theory. Because he didn't know where people came from, he used his mind to come up with the theory of ape-man evolution, but he couldn't make it a theorem or law because of the factual basis he had been looking for all his life.

In recent decades, scientists have found many evidences contrary to the theory of evolution. Since the development of genetics, it has been proved that the germ cells of each organism have their own unique genes; This gene contains the characteristics and instincts of the creature. Sometimes gene mutation changes the characteristics of the organism, but such mutations are all bad and cannot make the organism evolve.

Darwinian finally believed in God. Because Darwin wanted to find an animal between apes to prove his theory, he traveled around the world on the ship Hound from 1831 to 1836 to explore this animal. Afterwards, it was reported that New Zealand was the darkest place. The people there have no clothes and shoes, live in nests in trees, kill babies and sacrifice, worship idols, drink too much, commit fornication, and so on. Da Shi declared that this kind of people will have to evolve for 2, years before they can have the present human civilization. But after the introduction of the gospel of Christ, it was quite different. People can build houses, farm and plant trees, and get rid of bad habits. Darth can't come here without praising the power of Christ! So he donated a large sum of money to buy many bibles and distributed them to natives everywhere. He said: "I admit that primitive life began with the God of creation. Without an extreme reason, the universe cannot exist." (see Darwin's autobiography. )

Mrs. Hope told her in an interview with Mr. Darwin that in his later years, he was often ill in bed, and saw him wearing a purple robe and putting some pillows at his bedside to support his body; Looking at the Bible in his hand, his fingers kept twitching and he said sadly, "I used to be a child with no structure of thought. I was surprised that my thoughts spread like wildfire and gained many people's beliefs." He took a breath and talked about "the holiness of God" and "the greatness of the Bible." He also said, "There are about 3 people living near my villa, and it is urgent for you to explain the Bible to them. Tomorrow afternoon I will gather the servants, tenants and neighbors there. " He pointed to a room outside the window and said, "Would you like to talk to them?" I asked him, what questions are you talking about? He said, "Christ Jesus and his redemption. Isn't that the best topic?" When he told these words, his face was full of brilliance. I can't forget his incidental sentence: "If you come at three o'clock tomorrow afternoon, I will open this window. At the same time, do you know that I am singing a hymn with you! " (translated from The Shining Light. )

there is one special thing that human beings surpass all animals, that is, the ability of reason. No other animal can count from one to ten or understand the meaning of ten numbers. The instinct of a beast is just like a single note made by a flute, which is pleasant but limited. But the human mind can include all the notes made by various instruments in the band. Scientists in the United States once gave human education to apes and found that they only knew more and less, and they didn't know more than three. For example, if you give it ten apples and take away nine apples, it will beg you, because it knows less. If you give back three, it will be satisfied, although it is less than the original number, and it will not be recovered, because it feels more. If you want to teach it to know ten numbers, it is impossible. However, although the raw people are savages, after education, some of them can enter universities and know how to worship God. So it can be seen that apes are too far from people.

Everything is supported by God's wisdom. Many years ago, a cactus was transplanted in Australia as a fence. Because there were no insects that could harm it, the cactus began to multiply and grow violently. To a point, the ground occupied by this plant was as wide as the island of England, which crowded out the residents from the cities and villages and destroyed their countryside. Entomologists tried to find a way to resist, and finally found an insect, which eats nothing but cacti for a living.