Scholars of Xiang Yu and Napoleon who lost Waterloo when Wujiang committed suicide can help me analyze their advantages and disadvantages respectively.

In terms of personality, 1 and 65438 attach too much importance to personal feelings, and the most typical one is unfair rewards and punishments in the package. Corsicans have strong family values. Napoleon made his brother, brother and brother-in-law kings of Spain, Holland and Italy respectively. As a result, the people in the three places rebelled constantly, making Napoleon personally expedition again and again, exhausted. There are so many marshals under him who have made outstanding achievements in military service and are able to write and use martial arts, but they have only won the title of high official and honorary title, and no one can be king independently. It is not surprising that a Swedish Crown Prince let Bernardote defect to France. The same was true when Xiang Yu was enfeoffed behind the scenes. According to kinship, no one was assigned an inch of land, and the blocked country felt unfair. The newly pacified world immediately fell into chaos.

2, improper employment, can not accommodate people's strengths. Although they have many elite soldiers, there are many generals, but there are no handsome talents. Napoleon and Xiang Yu's personal expedition, both high morale, invincible, but none of their generals can be immune. Spain is like this, and so is Leipzig. Bernardote suggested that the anti-French alliance should avoid the emperor on the battlefield, only attack the general, and then reverse the occupation. Xiang Yu attacked Qi, but as soon as he left Qi, Zhong Limei and Long Che were defeated, and 200,000 troops were defeated by Han Xin. Xiang Yu told Cao Qian not to leave the station before leaving Xingyang, and as expected, he was wiped out as soon as he went to the battlefield.

3. Being too lofty and willful are their similarities. For Napoleon, the policy of mainland blockade, the handling of the Rhine Union, the policy of humiliating Austria excessively, and the expedition to Russia all had great disadvantages. Many people were trying to persuade him, but what could the emperor do if he went his own way? Not to mention Xiang Yu, "You don't even need to get a Fan Zeng". How can a unique wizard like garde nationale put himself in the position of the enemy and defeat the whole country with one hand?

Needless to say, the advantages of the two men are both victorious generals, both born in declining aristocratic families and ranks, and their personal charms are also different. The difference is that Napoleon is better at tactics and politics, and his ruling ability is also eternal. Xiang Yu is obviously not good at this; Xiang Yu's personal bravery is almost the first person in China for two thousand years. He treated his soldiers with courtesy, lived in harmony with them, and had the legacy of ancient nobles. Napoleon is obviously mature and cunning, and Xiang Yu is more like a sharp-edged and arbitrary child.