Why can't the Nobel Prize be the basis of national development?

It's not our fault that the second largest country in the world can't win the Nobel Prize.

Let's talk about awards in the humanities field first. These two awards are often not worthy of the name, and some even reward people who oppose the system and the black system in various countries. In less than 40 years, China has lifted 1 100 million people out of poverty, lifted hundreds of millions of people out of illiteracy, and turned the desert into an oasis, all of which are unprecedented great initiatives on this earth. Shouldn't he be awarded ten and eight peace prizes? But China won the Peace Prize, but it happened that he was the one who wanted to subvert the system.

Let's talk about the natural science award. Some people say that natural science is not as soft as the standards of humanities, and there will be no double standards. There are few Nobel prizes in natural science in China, mainly because our basic research is not solid and there are no top scientific research achievements to be obtained. I admit that the Nobel Prize in Natural Science is indeed harder than the standard of the humanities prize, and it is much harder, but is it really in line with the reality of the development of human social sciences? I don't think so

Again, since some people boast that basic scientific research is the basis of scientific and technological progress, is there no basis for China's great scientific and technological progress in recent years, even its leap-forward development? Some people always say that this is the convenience of other countries, which is nonsense at first glance. Any country's scientific and technological progress is developed on its own, and everyone is based on each other. The more national investment in science and technology, the greater its contribution to human scientific and technological progress. In recent years, China's investment in scientific research is second only to the United States, and its contribution will not be small. It is certain that it will surpass the United States in the future.

China's science and technology have developed so rapidly, but there are still not many Nobel Prizes in natural science, probably for two reasons. First, there are certain double standards. Don't talk about foreigners like "Bai Lianhua". Since they paid for the prize, it is impossible to have no intimacy. Under basically the same conditions, they will definitely choose ethnic scientists who share similar interests and values with the West. Second, there is a time lag between the achievement and the award. Many important scientific research achievements will take decades to be recognized by everyone. It is normal that many important scientific research achievements in China are not recognized for the time being, and it is also normal to have a delay.

In addition, the Nobel Prize is actually just a game in the West. Playing is ok, but it will hurt you. Isn't all the progress of mankind to better serve mankind? We engage in scientific research and promote the development of civilization not to win prizes, but to make ourselves better. Whether we can win the Nobel Prize is only a by-product of China's development. We can get it well, but it's nothing if we can't get it. After all, the bonus was given by others, so it's okay if we don't give it to you. I often say that China people should look up to the world, not on their knees, including the Nobel Prize. The obsession with the Nobel Prize is actually a kind of hope.

Today, it is time for China to wake up. We should rebuild and reconstruct our world view and cognitive view in almost all fields. After really reading the world, I believe you will have a completely different view on many things.