Parents-in-law have children, and it is their responsibility to support the elderly. Is it reasonable for the daughter to propose family property?

In my opinion, it is reasonable and legal for in-laws to suggest that children have the responsibility and obligation to support the elderly; It is also reasonable and legal for a daughter to put forward the idea that her children share the property equally.

First, it is reasonable and legal for in-laws to suggest that all children have the responsibility to support the elderly. China's marriage law stipulates that parents have the obligation to raise and educate their minor children, and adult children have the obligation to help and support their elderly and infirm parents. The above-mentioned legal obligations of parents to their children and children to their parents are reciprocal, mutual and complementary. According to the questioner's account, since the in-laws have raised and educated their children and are married, it can be seen that the in-laws have fully fulfilled their legal obligations to raise and educate their minor children. Then, children, regardless of sex, have the legal obligation to support their parents when they are old and weak.

Second, it is reasonable and legal for a daughter to ask all her children to get an equal share of property. Chinese law stipulates that men and women are equal. This legal provision not only refers to the equal legal status of men and women as husband and wife in family members, but also refers to the equal legal status of children in family members. It also includes the equal rights of men and women to obtain property and receive education, and also includes the equal rights of men and women to engage in employment and participate in social life ... The daughter mentioned by the questioner in this case advocates that both sons and daughters have equal rights to obtain property, which is of course reasonable and legal.

Third, judging from the relationship between the next sentence and the question, in my opinion, it is reasonable for children to get the same "property" (which should be understood as the legacy of their parents after a hundred years) as long as their sons and daughters have fulfilled their obligations to support their parents when their elderly parents need help and support. As long as a daughter supports her parents wholeheartedly when they are old, parents should not deprive her of her legitimate rights and interests when dealing with her family property before her death. This is not only unfair, but also prone to family conflicts, which is not conducive to children's equal filial piety to their parents.

The above comments are for reference only, please forgive me if there is anything wrong.

No pains, no gains, no pains, no gains. On the other hand, how much you get, how much you need to pay. If parents give all their property to their sons, but ask their daughters to support them together, this is biased in favor of sons and reflects the unfairness of parents.

On the other hand, if parents divide the property to their children and distribute it equally, then the children will share the responsibility of supporting their parents. It is unfair for either side to do nothing but pay. Even if her daughter is willing to support her, she is not satisfied, and she is angry and thinking.

Strictly speaking, in cities, most parents are supported by their children. Therefore, in cities, parents usually distribute their property to their children before leaving, and will not take sides. But in rural areas, most parents are supported by their sons, so there is nothing wrong with giving property to their sons. On the other hand, if you give all your property to your son and let your children support you together, it is unfair and thoughtless for your daughter.

Back to the question, when the in-laws propose to support their children together, then the property should also be given to the children, not the son alone. So it is reasonable for your wife (that is, the daughter of your in-laws) to offer a share of the property.

The question is, are the in-laws you meet reasonable people? Do they prefer boys to girls? Many parents give their property to their sons, but they want their children to support them together. In view of this situation, can a daughter refuse her parents' request for support?

No, legally speaking, all children have the responsibility to support their parents, but the law does not say that parents should give all their property to their children and give it to them reasonably. The law requires children to have the responsibility and obligation to support their parents, but it does not mention that daughters share their parents' property. From this perspective, it is the contradiction between love and law. Even so, even if your wife doesn't want to, I'm afraid she has to bear the responsibility of supporting her parents.

Although the parents-in-law asked their children to support them, they didn't give their daughter any property. The daughter offered to distribute the property reasonably, but they didn't give it. The daughter also had to support her, because she was raised by her parents and had the responsibility and obligation to support her, which had nothing to do with the property.

Don't say that parents ask their children to support each other. Some wonderful parents gave all their property to their sons, but asked their daughters to support them. What should you do when you meet such a parent? You have to support it, because the law stipulates that if you don't want to go to court, even if you win, you can only ask your children to support you together, but the law will never stipulate that your daughter can't support her parents.

Both parents-in-law have sons and daughters, and it is the child's responsibility to support the elderly. Is it reasonable for the daughter to propose family property? From the perspective of friendship, I think it is reasonable.

One of my classmates, her parents-in-law, like them, is also surprisingly patriarchal. My son was admitted to the county key high school and my daughter was admitted to the county key junior high school, but they just wouldn't let her go. The daughter cried and was slapped several times. As a result, the focus is gone, and even the town-run junior high school has not been admitted.

After the transformation of the old village, their family was divided into six houses. Once, a classmate's wife went back to her parents' house, and her parents told her daughter. Daughter said, so many houses, I don't have a set? Mom immediately changed her mind and said that she hadn't given it yet. Your father wants money.

My father-in-law was seriously ill, and her father-in-law asked her daughter and son to share the money. As a result, the son did not share the money, but also gave the son the remaining 200 of the money shared by the daughters. It has become a fact that the old man is sick, the daughter takes money and the son benefits.

My classmates told me: unfair. If you don't give me a suite, you don't care about raising them.

I told him that no matter how the property is distributed, it cannot be used as a reason not to support the elderly. From a legal point of view, it is impossible to ignore them. The only way is to let the elderly provide for the elderly with housing. Since they have so many properties, it is not appropriate for their daughters to share the pension and hospitalization expenses. When the old man's property is used up, let the children share the money, so there is nothing to say. But when the elderly need services, daughters should do their part.

As an old man, you should treat your children fairly. Only when a bowl of water is flat can your children be really good to you. If you are partial to one person, children will feel uncomfortable, even if they have served you in the past, they will not be sincere.

It is reasonable and legal for in-laws to support their daughters. It is reasonable that parents raise their children and children support their parents. It is also reasonable for daughters to share property. No property, parents don't raise it? In today's society, it is difficult to support children without money, and it is difficult to support the elderly without money. Some people just think about it, and have never thought about how hard it is for our parents to support us. It is reasonable and legal for in-laws to ask their daughters to support the elderly, and it is also reasonable and legal for their daughters to share property. This statement is morally unreasonable! Parents have no property to do this!

It has been a matter of course since ancient times that parents raise their children and children support the elderly.

Your parents-in-law have children, and it is the responsibility of all children to provide for the aged. It is also reasonable for your wife to share in the family property. It seems that no one is wrong. But think about it carefully, it is still necessary to say more.

In cities, most parents have savings and pension money, and it is common for daughters to inherit property. Even some parents don't care much about whether they have children to support the elderly, because they have financial strength.

In the countryside, it is different. Parents are mostly farmers, who eat more than enough and have less money. They have been looking for a way out for the yellow land and seeking development. In order to help children grow up and get married, they almost spilled sweat on the land. After their children get married, they not only don't have any savings at hand, but even get into debt. Not when you're old. Who can walk without relying on your children?

Your wife's proposal to divide the property is ok in the city, but not worth it in the countryside. You can get some old houses, so it's definitely inconvenient for you to plant a few acres of contracted land. I'm afraid I don't have much savings to share with my parents, let alone provide for the elderly. Why bother?

The old people here also have a saying, "Children should stand on their own feet." To put it bluntly, your wife has her own family, and it is the right way to visit her family often when she has time, and to care more about her parents. Don't cling to that little money, fight for yourself and live a good personal life!

Truth: It is reasonable for everyone to share the same responsibilities and enjoy the same rights.

Parents-in-law have children, and it is their responsibility to support the elderly. Is it reasonable for the daughter to propose family property? I think it is reasonable and legal. But the actual situation can be flexibly grasped. For example, the son inherited most of the inheritance, and the daughter basically didn't get the inheritance. According to the law of our country, a daughter can not bear the obligation to support her parents. In reality, the daughter will do part of her obligations out of affection. Although she won't get any inheritance, blood relationship is a lasting bond.

My parents-in-law have two women and a man. My family is the eldest, my son is the youngest, my father-in-law is a worker, and my mother-in-law works at home. According to the national regulations in previous years, the son (brother-in-law) took over the class of his father-in-law, and the pension and homestead were inherited. Five years ago, my father-in-law had a car accident by bus, and all the compensation went to his son. Father-in-law left the sequela of paralysis in the lower body, and he can take care of himself semi-independently. Four years ago, my mother-in-law was driving a motorcycle tricycle and was killed by a car that bought milk powder for her children. Because the car was borrowed from others, the economy was really difficult, and finally an agreement was reached to compensate 6,543,800 yuan. All the compensation goes to my brother. My sister-in-law and I will send 1000 yuan every Chinese New Year holiday and my father-in-law's birthday. Bought a disabled car and sent it there.

Our family is the boss, and we do our part. We have never talked about the father-in-law's support and inheritance, and listened to his arrangement. Father-in-law lives by his brother-in-law and is served by his husband and wife. He naturally dare not talk nonsense, and can only speak for them with his brother-in-law. As the saying goes, there is no dutiful son before his deathbed. Brother-in-law and his wife once put forward the idea of taking turns to serve their father-in-law. Sister-in-law is outspoken: "It is ok to take turns to support my father, and the property should be divided equally." My brother-in-law felt indefensible at that time and didn't mention it again. Sister-in-law is angry, but after all, she is a compatriot and her property is earned. It's boring to be too formal for a little inheritance.

I'm talking about my housework, not novels. The rights and wrongs of the family, if not cleaned up, will sometimes be very chaotic. "Honest officials can't break housework", why? Family is a place to talk about feelings, not society, which is prone to court proceedings. Family ties are related by blood and unique to all mankind, so the best way to deal with them is "inseparable", and naked money cannot be used to replace family ties.

"Brothers settle accounts clearly." But this is only one aspect of property rights, and we should not ask too much.

"Relatives are not * * * rich, and * * * wealth is not worth it." Feelings are damaged by the distribution of property, which is not worth the loss. At present, it is not worth the loss to go to court for just a few heritages, and no one cares what poor parents ask. Why can't we look at the relationship between property, affection, affection, obligation and harmony from a detached height? Generosity is more suitable for dealing with family. Haggle over every ounce will inevitably cause unnecessary emotional losses. Dealing with family relations should be based on feelings, and property is only an auxiliary part. Never put the cart before the horse.

Well-founded, tell the truth, pay attention: the truth. Let's look at the world from a rational point of view.

I feel that this problem is one of maintenance and the other of inheritance, and the two should be viewed separately.

1. Your parents-in-law are right, and all children have the responsibility to provide for the elderly. In many parts of our country, especially in rural areas, many women always feel that they are not their parents after marriage, so they go back to their parents and call their relatives away. I think my parents should be supported by my brother or younger brother, and I have no obligation to support them. There are still some people who regard supporting their parents as a choice and a conditional obligation, and think that if they don't want their parents' property, they don't need to support their parents. In other words, if you want to support yourself, you have to share some property. Both of these ideas are wrong. Article 21 of China's Marriage Law stipulates that children have the obligation to support their parents, and parents who are unable to work or have difficulties in life have the right to ask their children to pay alimony when their children fail to fulfill their alimony obligations. This shows that sons and daughters have the same obligation to support their parents. Children's obligation to support their parents is a legal obligation, and it is illegal for children not to support their parents. More seriously, it can constitute a crime of abandonment and will be sentenced. A daughter cannot refuse to perform the obligation of supporting her parents on the grounds that she has been married or has not obtained their parents' property. It is no problem for your parents-in-law to ask her to do her duty of support.

Second, about your daughter-in-law's family property, it is also correct to some extent.

The so-called "property division" is the division between parents before their death and after their death, which are different in nature. When parents are alive, distributing all their property to their children, whether equally or differently, is a gift and a unilateral legal act of parents. As children, they only have the choice of accepting or not accepting gifts, and they have no right to bargain over the amount of property.

After parents die, the distribution of all their property belongs to inheritance. If parents leave a will, they should follow it. If the parents did not leave a will, they shall be equally distributed among the heirs in the first order according to the principle of legal inheritance. Both sons and daughters are the first successors and enjoy equal inheritance rights. Of course, heirs who have fulfilled their main support obligations can get more points according to the law. So if your daughter-in-law wants to inherit the inheritance of your parents-in-law, it is also her right, and she has the right to inherit her due share.

In-laws have children, and children support their parents. According to the law, all children should have obligations and responsibilities.

However, all children born to parents have equal and reasonable rights to share their parents' property.

All property is owned by the son, and the daughter has no inheritance right, but only the right to support her in-laws, which is absolutely inconsistent with the old concept. This is against the law. It should be changed as soon as possible, so that it has both responsibilities and obligations and property inheritance rights, which is fair and reasonable.

I am a married daughter. I have several brothers and sisters. I never wanted my parents' property. My parents raised me for more than 20 years. When I got married, I went to my husband's house. I haven't taken care of my parents all day. My parents help me with my children without complaint. I fight for any property. I just want to have a deep affection in my parents' home. From work to the first few years of marriage, my brothers and sisters consciously gave their wages to their parents, and the family lived together frugally, and no one felt wronged. Speaking of grievances, isn't it more difficult for parents to bring up several children in difficult times and then try to provide them with a family? Who can really appreciate the parents' thoughts? Besides, the relationship between our brother and sister has always been harmonious. Growing up, we were all polite, never fighting for things, even stumbling and blushing once never happened. We only take care of each other. My mother also said that it is better to be nice to my daughter-in-law. See who knows to visit you during the Spring Festival, let alone provide for the aged. I will comfort my mother. You have a son and a daughter. Think about your filial piety first. Other people also have parents. They know it's better to come. Don't you want to keep them? As children, we will respect you. My family treats my daughter-in-law as a distinguished guest. They take good care of their families, take good care of our future generations and let the elderly worry. Don't expect too much.

It is right to divide the property equally. If you don't give it to your family, there will be many such things in the future. The heavy bride price is also a reason. Raising a family is better than raising a dog.

My father-in-law, three sons, three maids, my wife and her brother insist that the three maids support the elderly at the same time. I want to scold his ancestors as soon as I hear it. Her family doesn't know it's embarrassing to say this, three big men. Her brother is poor and pretends to be forced. I said, one family gives 1,000 a month, and the other family gives 6,000 a month, but he won't do it. This thinking is also taking care of his poverty. His brother was different and finally decided to raise a family for a month. I can't raise it anywhere else. We discussed asking his wife and her sister to help raise them for a month, and the salary was casually said. Later, his brother regretted it and wanted to raise it himself, but he didn't agree. In-laws are all lip service, not personnel.

We gave a lot of money. In the past, my mother-in-law was good. Sometimes, my wife gave money. I didn't know about the money at first. Back home, my mother-in-law said that all the money she spent was given by my wife. I realized that I don't think an old man can eat much, so it's ok for the old man to eat something good. The old man lives a single life and lives a good life. The market and vegetable shop are at the door, and it is convenient to eat. If the old man's son doesn't come home, the old man won't eat well.

In fact, it's nothing to take care of my mother-in-law, but their family is tired of doing things, and they have their own mother. Who cares if this goods are raised or not? I won't say anything. The old man is old and won't go.

My own family, three sisters, I am a boy, and my old mother is raised by myself. My hometown in Henan said that after the girl got married, the water she went out was still old-fashioned. Everyone knows why a family wants to have boys, and sons are used to prevent old age. My mother has my support, my illness, my food and my money. My mother used to be in my hometown, and my sister's family was poor. I'm out. Let my sister watch the house for me, and I'll cook a few acres of land. My sister's task is to ask my sister to help me if my mother is ill or something else. All the money is mine. In fact, the old family really can't. I have a cold. If I spend a little money on a phone call, it will be a big deal. My sister sold me the land at home. According to my sister, hundreds of thousands of bricks were sold for building houses. My wife won't. I held my head and said forget it without letting my wife say anything. Quarrel makes people laugh. I have been out for 20 years, and my sister has been living in my house until now. It's really not satisfying. My mother still cooks by herself, and the old man can't bear to be white. The money returned will be left. My girl went back to her hometown to see this situation and took my mother to Xinjiang. She is skinny and looks miserable. She brought it several times before, so she didn't come for fear of dying in other places.

My mother lived here for half a year. When I grew up in Xinjiang, I bought a car and sent my mother's ashes back to my hometown in Henan, more than 4,300 kilometers. I ran in Henan for three days.

When my mother was alive, she told me a lot about my sister. She loves money and is unfilial. My mother told me that you are not allowed to drink a bowl of tofu brain at my sister's house. This is what my mother told me.

I'm not very nice to my hometown people. I'm tired of watching them. Everyone lies to me. My mother was hospitalized in my hometown, and I didn't go back. I'll call back 8000 yuan directly. A few days later, I finished my work and brought more than 10 thousand yuan back to my hometown. But in fact, my mother only spent 3000 yuan to see a doctor, and my second sister didn't settle more than 20 thousand. My sister told me several times, but it didn't count in the end. I didn't have this relative when I returned to Xinjiang.