Is it reasonable to eat first without paying for shopping in the supermarket?

I always think that it is the most basic common sense not to touch things that are not your own, and it should also be a rule that everyone should abide by. If there are no paid goods in the supermarket, it is not your own thing. No matter how tired, thirsty and hungry you are, you must have the basic self-control of an adult and obey the rules. Children should make children ignorant, and children don't know the rules. If they don't teach now, when will they teach? When he becomes an unruly adult and makes a scene, or when he has his own children and can't teach them rules? Some people will say, I want to buy it anyway, and I won't pay for it. It's not a question of paying or not. Your moral level does not conflict with obeying the rules. Some people will say that when I did this, the employees in the supermarket didn't say anything themselves. This is not a question of what others have said or not. Whether others stop it does not conflict with obeying the rules. I think it makes sense to visit Zhihu before and see a reply to po. "Mr. Hu Shi said that a dirty country, if everyone speaks rules but not morality, will eventually become a normal country with human feelings, and morality will naturally return gradually; If everyone in a clean country talks about morality and nobility without rules and ethics every day, everyone will be selfless, and eventually this country will degenerate into a dirty country full of hypocrites. " Please ask those who have confidence in their morality and decide not to eat without giving money, you can eat first and then pay, you can temporarily put aside morality and briefly talk about the rules. In this way, I believe that real sellers and buyers will be happy.