How do you think Luo Yonghao will talk to the plaintiff about it if he loses the case?

There is a word called sophistry, which Luo Yonghao must have heard of, and he is also very good at it. If sophistry is used well, even if it is completely unreasonable, an opponent who is not good at on-the-spot debate and on-the-spot reaction may not be able to find a flaw immediately and come up with the best response. As the saying goes, it means "get each other in." Since "what's going on in the world can't be mentioned", Luo Yonghao can go to the court and reason with Weibo. Why do you have to argue on the spot? Its purpose is nothing more than using its own momentum and debate experience to "win" the opponent by surprise. It's not reasonable at all, but pretending to ask, "Why do so many people think what they say is better than telling the truth?" What a shame.