Xinyang video joke

The world is big, and there is no wonder. Some things in society sound strange. It seems strange that a woman reported a man's compulsory indecency, and the court was exempted from punishment because it was too short. Let's read the story first and then draw a conclusion.

First, this person's behavior lasts for a short time and is exempt from criminal punishment.

A woman reported a man by her real name on social networks. When the two were talking about things, the man locked the door, pulled the other person's braid and forcibly wiped the sensitive parts such as the woman's waist. After the woman reprimanded, they walked out of the reception room together. The woman said that the man's behavior made her feel depressed and took medicine for a long time to maintain sleep. And men want to take advantage.

The way a man closes a case is actually to threaten and induce with money or work progress, with the aim of getting a woman to drop the lawsuit and sign a letter of understanding. Women feel that men don't respect themselves, refuse to sign letters of understanding and go to court. The court accepted the matter. For the woman's statement, the court looked at the video taken by the police. The time they spent in the reception room was only 70 seconds.

Judging from the time, the man's behavior is not enough to make other threats, but the man confessed to his behavior. On this basis, the court made a judgment and found the man guilty of compulsory indecency. Because of the short time, there was no criminal punishment. In this regard, the woman was dissatisfied and filed an appeal. The court of second instance dismissed the appeal and upheld the original judgment.

However, men's behavior has not been condoned. Because of his behavior, the unit where he worked fired him and fired him from public office. For men, the punishment is still relatively heavy. From this, we can know that the unit where we work does not tolerate male behavior, but hell to pay. This man also paid a heavy price for his behavior.

Two, the court's decision may cause controversy, but there is no problem.

Before the judgment, the court fully investigated the relevant case. It takes 70 seconds for one person to go to the reception room and then two people to come out. The man's behavior may be compulsory indecency, but it is not enough to constitute serious consequences. Although women say that they need to take medicine to stay awake, there is no corresponding evidence to prove that sleep disorders are directly related to men's behavior.

Women's demands are compensation and punishment. For the court, although men's behavior infringes on women's rights and interests, it is not enough to cause serious social consequences, and the punishment of compulsory obscenity is very serious. Because the starting point is fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention, even if the punishment is exempted, it is a very serious treatment for men.

Although the man was not punished, the crime of compulsory indecency was a criminal offence. As long as the charge falls on him, it will be recorded in the file. This man was fired for this crime, and this is the consequence that he must bear. This crime will also affect his children. It is almost impossible for his children to take the civil service exam or join the army.

Some people say that this is the fault of men's behavior, and it deserves it. Indeed, he should bear the consequences and pay a huge price. We are concerned about the court's decision. There is no problem with the court's decision. Although the man was not directly sentenced to prison, his position was relieved and his children were influenced by him. His punishment is enough.

Women are not satisfied. From the point of view of the courts, they can no longer help women seek justice. The justice that women want is to throw men into prison. Judging from the consequences of breaking the law, the court has no basis to put men in prison. From this perspective, the court still stands on the position of women to conduct trials, which is also a respect for women. Just a woman's request. It's too high.

The practice of the court is still commendable. Many people just read the title and think that the court protects the rights and interests of men, and it is only by reading the words that it makes sense. The court's position is clear and will not tolerate male behavior. The court's decision is heavier for men. In any case, women's demands have been greatly satisfied.

Third, netizens should not be influenced by some people and question the fairness of the court.

Some people saw some words, just an introduction. Many people just read these, without reading other contents, directly comment and even doubt the impartiality of the court. Some people even talk nonsense. This kind of person is eager to make things clear, and is also easy to be used and become a knife in others' hands. Through the description of the woman and the judgment of the court, we can know that there is no problem in the court's practice.

The woman is also dissatisfied with the judgment of the second instance, because it has a great influence on her. My in-laws ignored her and had a bad relationship with her husband. She thinks this man should be sent to prison. However, the court staff also saw her dynamics and responded: If the parties are dissatisfied with the judgment, they can apply to the Provincial High Court for retrial.

Some netizens feel that there is no problem with the court's response, because they will not actively investigate the case because of the woman's voice. There is no problem with the court's decision. Why take the initiative to withdraw the verdict? A woman's voice is just to express her wishes. If she refuses to accept it, she can try again according to the procedural requirements.

There are also some netizens who think that although the court's approach is correct, it seems inhuman from the judgment. There is no evidence to prove that there is something wrong with the court's decision, so we must respect the court's decision. If you feel that there is a problem, it is also possible to file a retrial according to the procedure. What do you think of this? Welcome to leave a message and discuss together!