The negative reviews for the ending of "I Am Yu Huanshui" skyrocketed. Who is satirizing women's rights?

The drama "I am Yu Huanshui" is really too magical and realistic. It seems absurd but has deep meaning. It exposes social reality through humorous and ironic ways. It can be said that irony is applied to Extremely detailed and well handled. I think it's worth watching. Many people have different understandings of the ending. I just think that Yu Huanshui has completed a spiritual redemption and lived again

But for such a good drama, the ending still can't escape the bad ending?

On the reasons behind "I Am Yu Huanshui"'s Douban score falling from 8.5 to 7.5, it is thought-provoking and very ironic.

Because of a line in the play that seemed to involve women’s rights, Douban’s score was 1 point crazy.

The scene of this line is roughly like this: Yu Huanshui and others were kidnapped. A woman said that she was a vulnerable female group and should be let go. The kidnapper said, "Don't come here. They usually pursue female boxing. What does gender equality mean for vulnerable groups now? This script is full of satire, it all depends on what you think. However, this line caused public outrage and was retaliated with crazy negative reviews. The negative reviews soared to 36%.

It is also produced by Noon Sunshine. Faced with the sarcasm of some men in "Everything is Fine", they would smile with their palms clasped in their hands, sighing that such and such is really the case, and then after the plot was cleared up, they would beat their feet and chest and wait for it. Recipe for eating alive. Today's "I Am Yu Huanshui" is also bitterly satirical. Some people gave "Anger and Uprising" a star rating, accusing it of insulting women, stigmatizing women's rights, etc. To be honest, if such a thing didn't really happen, would the screenwriter have thought of such a satirical plot?

As for women’s rights, the first half of this drama is very real, and the second half is more dramatic. As for what caused disgust among female audiences, it was the line that mentioned women's rights. But isn’t that line ironic? It satirizes those people who are extreme in their pursuit of women's rights, and who attack women whenever they disagree. In fact, there is also satire on men in the plot.

Pursuing women’s rights and advocating equality between men and women are qualities that everyone in contemporary society should possess. However, in the process of pursuing equal status between men and women, the emergence of black sheep should indeed be criticized. There are only a handful of people on the Internet who oppose gender equality, but there are many who oppose extreme feminism.

In fact, many debates stem from the confrontation between extreme feminism and its opponents. It is natural for the female group to speak out about gender discrimination that exists in society, and it will be supported by the entire public opinion; but it should not be too sensitive. Women are subject to gender discrimination in society, which requires the joint efforts of the entire society.

The line that satirizes women’s rights is just a trigger

I don’t think that line is insulting to women. It just refers to the current phenomenon and mocks the use of women’s rights as a banner for personal gain. Just people. This has nothing to do with humiliating women. It’s about those feminisms that behave in a disgusting way, known as pastoral feminism, also known as female boxing. Maybe some people have been poked, and in order to prove that they are not such people, they react by jumping three feet high.

Those words don’t sound good, but they do exist. The phenomenon of being hated by people was written into the script by the screenwriter, and some people who saw it hated the phenomenon he wrote and the irony it carried. I feel that I and a large number of people have been ridiculed by generalizations.

Loss or lose because the drama team did not take into account the current Internet climate and audience these days: impetuous people, the craze for following trends, audiences who cannot think rationally... This is a film that needs careful attention. It is a good drama, but in the current environment it is destined to be a highly polarizing drama.

In general, this drama is quite good to watch. It has flaws and flaws, makes you feel aggrieved, relieves stress, and finally returns to reality.

You don’t have to like it, there’s no need to criticize it with moral values.

People who are angry because there are no positive female characters must not understand this show. There is no good person in this show, or in the eyes of the audience, they are all "bad people", regardless of gender. Everyone else stands on the opposite side of Yu Huanshui, and Yu Huanshui is not a perfect person. This drama uses the mouths of people from all walks of life to mock real life.

This line about women’s rights is indeed a bit abrupt, because strictly speaking, what they are talking about is not women’s rights, and women’s rights do not mean that women are weak. If you think about it carefully, what they said is quite consistent. The female partner is originally a person who likes to bully others and is afraid of taking advantage of the situation. The kidnapper said okay? Give you female rights?, but she is just an ignorant and illiterate loser.

Domestic films have slightly stepped out of the weird circle of popular stars since the beginning of online dramas. Now it is their turn to not only withstand the iron fist of socialism, but also have to endure the fists of some scheming women. I really can’t accept it. I fully support women's efforts to protect their own interests in a reasonable manner. For example, this kind of behavior that grabs something to maliciously increase the points of some groups, I really hope that the Internet will verify their names as soon as possible. Reality and the Internet must be consistent. ?