Anti-smoking Q&A questions! Urgent, urgent..

1. Total smoking ban, absolutely in favor!

2. Regarding what the person in the program (hereinafter referred to as **, you will know who it is after reading it), which country in the West did not develop through tobacco! This view is absolutely wrong. Feudal society was a backward and corrupt society compared to now, but compared to primitive society and slave society, it was a great progress. This can also be compared to tobacco. Maybe it was an economic development in the past. Good products, but as the economy develops, the tobacco industry will one day be eliminated from this society. It must rely on the power of non-smokers, not time. This is just like capitalism and socialism also rely on the principles of revolution! Don't use this excuse anymore, smokers, you will only violate your conscience more!

3. Tens of thousands of people have thousands of thoughts, whether it is to vilify smokers or to discriminate against smokers. To tell the truth, many non-smokers can ask themselves whether the ban on smoking is to discriminate and vilify smokers. The purpose is for non-smokers to take less second-hand smoke for their own health, and for the health of smokers, relatives and friends. Don't use this excuse anymore, smokers will only violate their conscience more!

4. The ** said that second-hand smoke is inhaled by other people and not caused by smokers. This sentence is simply ridiculous. Even a three-year-old child would laugh at this huge joke. It is extremely ridiculous. There is simply no logic. Even if you have logic, even if you are not directly exposing others to second-hand smoke, you are indirectly exposing others to second-hand smoke. Can you say that you have no responsibility? Without your smoking, there would be no second-hand smoke for others. This is absolutely correct!

5. Wen Dao said why not ban cars? Cars also produce exhaust gas! This logic makes many smokers an excuse. Nowadays, all foods have catalysts, banned chemicals, etc., in short, nothing is good. Some so-called nutritionists even say that even drinking water can cause cancer. This is simply fart. He can talk nonsense, make up nonsense, and report nonsense! Like the second point, this car has become the current driving force for development. It has not yet reached retirement age. Just like capitalist society, although it has shortcomings, it is still in the development stage. The biggest contradiction has not yet intensified, which is the production society. Resolve the contradiction between ownership of the means of production! So it still has the value of existence, and the contradictions caused by smoke are like this. For example, the contradictions in feudal society are getting bigger and bigger now, and there will soon be a force (socialist revolution) to eliminate them, and Hong Kong The smoking ban in Hong Kong is a small revolution. In the future history, the smoking ban in Hong Kong will probably be a great progress. Don't use this excuse anymore, smokers will only violate their conscience more!

6. Another issue is the number of people. If you join this society, it is still a harmonious society. The government has the obligation to protect the rights of non-smokers (minimize or even prevent second-hand smoke). It's very similar to how many adults you have in a family. If you still love the child, the adults will agree to the child's request and take care of his health under normal circumstances. Maybe smokers will say that we are not family adults. Non-smokers are not the children of this family, so why should I accommodate them? If they have such thoughts, I have nothing to say, and there is no reason at all, because this is unreasonable (unreasonable in Mandarin) ! Don't use this excuse anymore, smokers will only violate their conscience more!

7. Returning to the topic, it is true that whether to protect human rights is relative. Smokers have the freedom to smoke, but non-smokers have the right not to smoke secondhand smoke. Smokers can also say that you have reduced Where we smoke is also an infringement of our rights. However, in order to prevent second-hand smoke from smokers, non-smokers support the move to increase non-smoking areas. This is caused by smokers smoking. Therefore, you are infringing on the rights of non-smokers, and non-smokers are only claiming their rights.

8. There is also that ** who said that buying cigarettes can increase national tax revenue. This is probably what he means. The purpose of the state's high taxes on cigarettes is to reduce the number of people buying cigarettes, which fundamentally helps to ban smoking. It is not because smoking is addictive, just like those stores that raised prices of isatis root during the SARS period in order to make huge profits.

So the **** came from the side again! ! If a country wants to achieve economic development by harming people's health, what word can be used to describe this country? What do you think? Don't use this excuse anymore, smokers will only violate their conscience more!

9. There is also the live audience, the one who likes to watch others smoke. That said, in my eyes, he is a weirdo.

After all, there are few people in the world who like to watch people smoke, and few who like to smoke second-hand smoke, so don’t use this excuse anymore. Smokers will only violate their conscience more!

10. I read this sentence on the 99th and 100th floors: "It's a boring topic, a boring action. Smoking is not illegal, so why is it prohibited by legislation... The most harmful thing to people is, Let’s take care of the one that does the most harm to the earth.” Smoking is indeed not illegal, but it is illegal to infringe on other people’s rights, and attraction indirectly infringes on other people’s rights. It’s like killing people, but it takes a long, long time to kill, you said. It's not illegal. It is because of the particularity of the harm caused by smoking that it cannot be classified as a crime. Therefore, special methods such as "increasing no-smoking areas" are needed to ban smoking!

I’m tired and don’t want to talk anymore. I watched this program by chance. I was so excited while watching it that I shouted until my throat was hoarse. I had no place to vent, so I came here and posted a post. I am a 16-year-old boy who is still young, and I am particularly disgusted with the smell of cigarettes!

Coupled with my dad’s incident, I feel that smokers have all kinds of excuses to oppose a complete ban on smoking or increasing the number of no-smoking areas. I dare say that these excuses are absolutely valid under the light of truth. It's like fire wrapped in paper. No matter how good the quality of the paper is, no matter how long it takes, the paper will always burn. There is no doubt about it! However, non-smokers should also understand the addictive nature of cigarettes and the helplessness of smokers, so everyone should not be too aggressive in their tone. If the content above is excessive, please bear with me.

To those smokers who still want to live a happy life: For the sake of everyone’s health, learn to quit smoking, hello to me, hello to everyone!