Why is Apple's user privacy protected? 202 10820

Why is Apple's user privacy protected?

Before answering this question, let me talk about what Apple has done to protect users' privacy.

The most direct feeling of Apple users is that when they just upgraded the system, they took the trouble to get a pop-up prompt of location information permissions. This pop-up window has two options, a. Ask the App not to track B. Allow.

Seeing the usage of the word stalking, I think most people will choose the same one as me. After all, stalking is not a good word. Even if you don't understand what it means, you don't want to be followed yourself.

By using this method to guide, most Apple users have made certain restrictions on the transmission of data from the APP background to the server, only transmitting necessary and useful information.

In addition, when we use the mobile phone browser to browse web pages, the browser will record the web pages that users have seen, and the websites that users visit will also record the IP addresses of visitors. None of this would have happened if Apple users had used their own browser Safari. Of course, this function is limited to using your own browser.

There are other privacy protections, which will not be explained here.

Back to the question at the beginning, why does Apple do a good job in protecting users' privacy?

You might say that Apple is user-centered, that Apple is an ethical company, or a company with a sense of social responsibility.

Maybe you are right, but is it possible?

It was created by Apple's business model. How do you say this?

Before answering this question, why did those apps get a lot of user information?

It is because users' information can be obtained, users can be pictured, and then precise marketing and advertising can be carried out for this group of people. This involves huge interests.

You might say, is this more about Apple's sense of social responsibility?

But what I want to say is that it is probably not, but because Apple's main source of income comes from hardware revenue, and advertising revenue only accounts for a small part, so it was said that it was decided by the business model.

Of course, this is just an idea, and I don't know the real reason.

Judging from this assumption, it is probably not a sense of responsibility and morality for a company not to do evil. It is more likely that the profit-making method does not support making this kind of money.