Help me look at the computer, thank you

If the budget is not enough, you can go to P43 board, regardless of dual graphics cards.

The overclocking ratio of P43 and P45 boards is limited to 400 hmz. If E7400 is multiplied by 10.5, the maximum limit of 4.05 can be exceeded. Of course P45 can be exceeded, because there is no upper limit for external frequency, but do you dare to exceed that much? The main frequency of E7400 2.7G exceeds 4G, which is very exaggerated. With 4 cores, the external frequency is almost lower than E74, so the upper limit is higher.

Think for yourself and make your own decisions based on practicality.

display card

I didn't pay much attention to this, because the same product 9800GTX+ ashes is called the king of flower frequency, so I don't like it.

CPU word

If you say you want to change the 4 cores on this machine in the future, I think I'll forget it.

For playing games, 4-core U has no advantage now. At present, the CPU requirements have exceeded many games, and there is still room for dual-core development. Moreover, the games that come out now need higher and higher frequency, and no game factory is in a hurry to produce games that support 4 cores. Most games only require single core or dual core. In single and dual-core games, entry-level 4-core is not as good as high-frequency dual-core. So it's no use talking about quad-core playing games now.

Of course, quad-core games are a trend, but the game should also be balanced. I haven't seen any games that require high CPU and low graphics card. If you can only run a 4-core game, you may not be able to eat it with your current graphics card. You should consider changing the graphics card again. Maybe DDR3 memory is expensive again. ...

So at this time, it is better to change the whole machine.

So most people who play games now consider using high-frequency dual-core instead of entry-level 4-core.