Leopard 2A7+ and our 99 big change PK, one-on-one, who is more likely to win?

Leopard armor is a joke. The front of the turret is vertical armor. The wedge that looks spectacular is actually made of iron. It is called a hollow bra. And because there is a gun sight mirror inexplicably on the right side, there is less armor and uneven protection on both sides. Chobham, the source of armor technology, was bought from England, but was cheated. The two companies have been fighting for this for many years, and then they barely qualified. German guns are really good, and the level of play is average. Good motive, too.

In contrast, the power of the 99 major reform is not bad at all (heart disease is an old story), the armor is first-class (the wedge on the front of the turret is a solid armor block), the firepower is first-class, and the fire control is also the world's advanced level. There is not much suspense in fighting leopards.

Supplement:

The 99 slope is optimized according to the armor structure. The leopard's big iron box can't fit into the armor, and the angle and structure are not allowed. It is still useful for the jet of armor-piercing projectile. France's "built-in suspended armor module"? You mean the legendary mineral water armor? (leclerc turret is surrounded by a toolbox, which can be stuffed with several bottles of mineral water. Take ten thousand steps back, even if this big bra can really fit into the armor, how can the turret be balanced?

Playing composite armor is not that simple. In those years, we tried tens of thousands of materials and made thousands of experiments on ceramics with different materials and properties, and accumulated huge basic data. Chobham in Britain has been studying it for 30 years, and the United States has directly used it from Britain. How did Germany make rapid progress overnight? In addition, the Germans have a long history of wasting protective weight, and the protection level of nearly 60 tons of tiger tanks is the same as that of 40 tons of Stalin. Leopard 1 armor is the level of anti-small caliber guns. I really don't know what to say. ...

The major reforms in 1999 and 1999 were actually two steps. The latter was basically reborn because of the changes in the 1990s. You can compare the turrets of the two, and change the back for a long time, just to balance the armor added in front. In addition, our repackaging potential of 125 is much greater than that of 120.

The problem of tank protection can be found in the library, but unfortunately, due to confidentiality reasons, 99 parts were not made public.