Does the joy of learning depend on grades? Debate competition. Our point of view is that the joy of learning does not depend on grades. Urgent, urgent, next week.

Happiness in learning does/does not depend on grades. This sentence seems easy to understand, but it seems very long and needs to be broken down to explain it clearly. If it is like the classical Chinese translation, I will first decide (the joy of learning) (it depends/does not depend) (score).

So I first looked for what is the joy of learning, and it seems that what is happiness comes first. I think happiness is a pleasant feeling, but the other party in the debate is likely to say: You said it is , that is, it is also no; if you say no, then it is not, and it is also no. Even Wuhan University in 2001 produced a modern Chinese dictionary in the finals of the college debate competition. So you can use Baidu Encyclopedia, Modern Chinese Dictionary, or Cihai as you wish. But when I think about it, there is nothing to say about happiness. Even if he sophistry to the point of pain, it is still happiness (why would he sophistry on this issue if he really has this ability), anyway, the persuasiveness is weak (sophistry is to logically get you involved, but people feel that something is wrong. , which is why he is not very convincing), so we should first understand what the joy of learning is?

Whether we like learning or not, there are always times when we like it. Why? Here I found that we still have to clarify what learning is? Studying in elementary school, middle school, and university is of course learning. Even for this debate competition, we had a lot of studying before the competition. Our classmates also learned to play games. There were many who were interested in learning but not interested. So here we look: We have learned a lot if we are not interested, and we have good results in exams, but are you happy? (Note that this example cannot explain anything and must be consistent with your argument. This example here may be a point of confrontation for you. The advantage of this example is that it does not matter whether there are achievements or happiness in some things, but in retrospect we The grades mentioned are actually limited to the final result, but even if the grades include major exams, small exams, mid-term exams, mid-term exams, final exams, high school exams, college entrance exams, etc., even if we solve a question, it is also a grade. If we can't solve it, we have to use our brains to develop it. It seems that poor thinking is also an achievement, so it depends on how you define it. What I suggest is to cooperate with the argument, without being too rigid, and strictly adhere to the bottom line)

So from the above I summarized 1. The joy of learning, this kind Happiness is both in the process of learning and in the final gain after leaving the study. 2. What is beneficial to us is the final or staged result, and what is beneficial to the opponent is the entire process. (Generally speaking, we tend to focus on the whole process), because this is not the key point, and it doesn’t mean much whether you take advantage of it or not.

Generally speaking, we still think that the positive side is mainly established, and the negative side is mainly broken. (I don’t quite agree with this point of view, but this sentence in this debate is somewhat interesting) Judging from the competition purely, the opposition argument in this competition is indeed a purely opposition argument. I don’t know if you will come up with it like this. A process or something else to show that this is the joy of learning, and deny the results. I don’t think you need to find something that can determine the joy of learning. (What do we say from a more mature perspective that determines the happiness of learning? Many factors determine the same, and grades are only one part, so we should also look at grades correctly and pay attention to some things that are actually very important to us but are ignored by me. Such things are ignored. And we can see that we have all suffered from the disadvantages of exam-oriented education. Note that from a theoretical point of view, both sides can do all kinds of extravagant sublimation, but why do some people say it is good and others agree with it? , when someone says it, do you think it’s a leader’s speech—complete nonsense? Because although some people’s reasoning is ordinary, they cite things that can be encountered around us, or the language is fluent and moving. Of course, there are many methods here. The main thing is to find one that suits you)

Your competition system seems to have high requirements for on-the-spot debates, but is relatively weak for one- and four-part debates. But this depends on two aspects. Such a competition system can easily cause the first and fourth debates to be weak. In this context, if you have an excellent first and fourth debates, you will have an advantage.

Especially the fourth debate, why do you say that? Because I read the manuscript during the first debate (in fact, if you watch college debate competitions, you will know that their first debate is basically at the level of announcers. If you listen to our own first debate again, you will almost die... But this skill cannot be mastered in a short time to be honest, and It is not about professional debating ability. The important thing about the fourth debate is that it does not end in an anticlimactic manner. Moreover, the development of the fourth debate takes a long time and the cost is high. If you are interested, take a look at Huang Zhizhong, who participated in the 2001 money debate and the 2003 finals. It became the comeback...)

In fact, I will just talk casually and superficially here. I would like you to give me your information and send it to Baidu HI website. If you If you are willing, if there is anything else you can discuss, you are welcome to communicate in HI.