The thinking mode of pseudo-INTP is 20 15.3. 18.

I suddenly want to sum up my thoughts in the middle of reading, so that I can optimize my exam.

Before I decided that I was the INTP type, I was very interested in the same type of thinking. However, the discussion in Douban group is very watery and there is no substantial progress, so try to sum up the way you have trained or are training.

Learning method:

In my sophomore blog post, I described this idea as holding a scalpel at myself under a shadowless lamp. Get out of your present body and look at your behavior from the perspective of a bystander.

This can help me control my emotions effectively and restore calm.

There is a word in Buddhism called "mindfulness", which means that when you do something, you should be clearly aware of what you are doing-this is equivalent to the first step of pulling away. At first, when facing some tear-jerking movie pictures, you can try to have the following dialogue in emotional contagion, taking her state as an example (you see, I said that people who usually like to pull themselves away from analyzing problems will habitually use themselves as analytical materials):

* * "How do I feel now?" **

-Feel sad.

* "Why do you feel this way?" **

-Because I witnessed the separation between lovers, I felt the gap between artificial intelligence and human beings, and so on ...

"How does this affect me/directly?"

As a good thinking material, it may deepen the perceptual knowledge of artificial intelligence.

Usually the next thought is

* * "Does this influence have to be accompanied by this feeling?" **

The answer is naturally no, so the mood can be calmed down quickly, and the brain begins to focus on the meaning of the film itself. One advantage of doing this is that I can get my mind out of the state of herding sheep faster, avoid unnecessary emotional immersion, and let me focus on what I am interested in quickly-I believe it can help you react faster when I am extremely angry or surprised. In fact, I seldom have a blank brain (except forgetting things), which is the advantage of being influenced by this habit.

A higher way is to get rid of another self, look down at what this self is doing, and give supervision and feedback at all times. Moreover, when encountering negative emotions, the direct audience of negative emotions can act on the current self, while the other self begins to deal with the consequences caused by negative emotions-he can even tell jokes or encourage the injured companion when he is scared.

It's always good to look at the world and yourself from another angle.

A higher way is to try to associate other people's thinking. At this time, the other self can become someone else to act-this can help train and understand others, and at the same time learn faster with the help of others' experience.

About logic and analysis.

In my opinion, this is very interesting and can be related to the computing power of Go.

I often wonder what will happen if my opponent does this, and how I will respond.

In this case, the plan is like a path that keeps branching forward. In this process, the flow of thinking will be faster and faster, and you can also feel the pleasure of thinking. If the opponent's steps are responsive, it will stimulate the next round of feedback. This feeling is hard to describe, but it can make people immerse themselves in it.

As mentioned here, economic investment is a measure of the input-output ratio. Personally, I think this example can illustrate this topic well. The model is very important, and the others are just additional decorations.

People who are used to thinking like this absorb knowledge faster and get to the point more easily. For example, when reading novels or art movies, they usually pay attention to the plot rather than fragments. I call it "fishbone".

Recently, I have been thinking about the meta-problem of the third-order Rubik's cube-I vaguely feel that it uses something similar to a matrix and only considers three-dimensional space.

There is often a feeling that things are connected in series to form a complete picture.

This ability is similar to making up stories-in MBTI, it should belong to extroverted intuition, so when touching a concept, it can often be connected with other concepts to form a big net.

In the past, dynamic programming was used to solve the central problem of physics, and visual animation of the right brain was used to solve the arithmetic problem of the Rubik's cube-not much, but I felt that I needed to strengthen my exercise.

After reading Tony Bozan's series and Scott Young's books, I feel that they are learning and organically forcing themselves to build a network about this book.

If my fishbone behaves like a pencil sharpener, their thinking is more like a puzzle.

At this time, the flow of ideas will reach a lasting state, which is very interesting.

As a memory of hearing and images, I have a good memory of maps and music.

I analyzed it, because the right brain is good at associating colors with tones-for example, I remembered the tones when I tried to recite ancient Chinese, and the results were surprisingly good. In the same way, I read Tony Bozan's Bozan Learning Method, which mentioned that I remember numbers with colors, and I realized that my numbers have unique colors. Therefore, we will strengthen our training in this field in the near future, and train ourselves that when we see a number string, it will be immediately associated with the color, so that a picture will appear in the right brain and our memory will be stronger.

Learning habits

1+ 1 & gt； 2. It feels good to get along with excellent thinkers and get good books and ideas through our eyes. In fact, I have recently acquired many good books, ideas and habits. Some people can strengthen their willpower through supervision, some people can share knowledge to discover more novel things, and some people can learn firmly through discussion.

Take man as a mirror and history as a mirror.

Doing, struggling:

First, the blog platform has not yet been determined;

Second: I don't know how to take notes efficiently;

Third: I don't know what a better mindmanager is.

Benefits, a summary; Second, there is continuous motivation and feedback. Third, as Dark Time said, it is low-cost, time-consuming, making like-minded friends or starting discussions.

According to Bozan's statistics, I am a fast reader (1200~2020 words/minute), but my comprehension ability is worrying. So I plan to read more quickly, then write a summary or do the questions silently, and then go back and grasp the key points for training.

And provide some blog tips:

Visual method:

User's guide:

Keyword storage lock (key! ):

Tell me about my old habit (mainly related to all the literary works I read when I was a child). I read faster without asking too much understanding, and slower when I meet something new and interesting or need to learn-this ensures that I forget everything I know, but I can write as much as the author. I don't know. It's still an interesting highlight. I won't forget it.

But this is easy: first, it is a one-sided trivial difficulty rather than a macro grasp. Second, the reading speed will slow down, and many times the forgotten part will not be chewed.

In short, it needs to be improved to ensure that all the difficulties are remembered after reading it.

I am keen on reading English original works, books with more logical symbols in mathematical language rather than works with more literature than philosophy-the hard road is getting easier and easier, the easy road is getting harder and harder, and the world is tempered.

When you get the rules, you should first consider the critical conditions of the rules, always want to see new things and ideas, and ensure that the requirements of making the best use of things and the curiosity of external things are at work.