There is a temptation called "Schrodinger's girlfriend". It's interesting to savor it carefully. what do you think?

I don't know if you have brushed some videos recently, such as Temptation. The content is about his girlfriend saying something noncommittal. The boy stopped answering directly according to the answer to the question. The girl suddenly ran away after hearing it, and then left a "breakup".

Of course, some of what I saw in the comment area is normal, and I don't think such a probe is necessary. After all, as long as I am a normal person, I will reply like this.

If what I said above is not clear enough, let me introduce you to a familiar question: If your ex-girlfriend comes to borrow money from you, will you borrow it?

This question is all too familiar. According to normal thinking, the answer should be "yes" or "no", but up to now, the standard answer should be "where did my ex-girlfriend come from?" Everyone is full of desire to survive, but they don't find you jumping back and forth on the edge of temptation.

I have seen a term called "Schrodinger's girlfriend" on the Internet before, and the friend who said this term is also a god. At that time, he was answering a question. Let me repeat this question and answer you:

Ask questions and tell your boyfriend what to do if he has no money (joking, tentative). Asked if my boyfriend could take 800 yuan from his wallet, he seriously said no.

Answer, when your girlfriend asks you for money:

1. If you choose to give money, your girlfriend will collapse into a "girlfriend with no money".

2. If you choose not to give money, your girlfriend will collapse into a "girlfriend who tests the other half".

And before you choose, you can't be sure what state your girlfriend is in. At this time, "girlfriend who really has no money" and "girlfriend who tries the other half" are superimposed on each other, and unless there is an observer present, they will be in a state of quantum entanglement.

This experiment is the girlfriend of the famous Schrodinger.

What is called "quantum mechanics" is proved by action.

Of course, according to this joke, we can derive countless "Schrodinger's so-and-so", but isn't it Schrodinger's cat that we come back to treat the temptation of this behavior?

We ask questions in order to get the answer that the other party is waiting for. If there is no waiting, there is actually a gap in my heart.

As we said before, no matter how many times we think about it before deciding to do something, don't forget to consider the worst possible outcome. What will I do if this result is not what I want?

Take the above question as an example. The logic behind this question is not a boy's answer. Although his answer is really a bit confusing, as one of the respondents said, "exploratory question?" If he really wanted to give you money, would you? "

By the same token, if the other party really refuses, why is there such a gap in my heart?

Use this as an analogy to our curiosity, such as looking through my partner's mobile phone. If there is something I can't bear, can I face this result safely?

There has always been a saying: don't test human nature.

Because of your temptation, whether joking or not, there is a waiting value for me, but behind this waiting value, there is also the temptation of how the other party treats you.

Two people who love each other should trust each other more, shouldn't they?

The premise of temptation is that even a little bit of distrust exists in my heart, but when it acts on the other side, it will magnify this little bit several times.

None of us want to be "Schrodinger's boyfriend" or "Schrodinger's girlfriend". If something is suspicious, we should communicate appropriately. After all, no one wants to live in doubt.

Of course, if you want to talk about the mood in life, you need not only to find it interesting, but also to find it interesting. Otherwise, wouldn't it be smug?