property dispute

1, theoretically, what your uncle did was illegal. According to your local land contracting method, since the land is under your and your father's name, the compensation for land acquisition should naturally be collected by you and your father. Now that your father is gone, even if he inherits his part according to the inheritance law, it will be shared equally by the first heir. You, your mother, your grandmother and your grandfather (if still alive) will each get one, which has nothing to do with your uncle.

In fact, if you go to court, you have a better chance of winning. But there is the risk of "winning the lawsuit and losing money" as you said.

Moreover, according to the current efficiency of the court, this lawsuit can't be settled in half a year, and it will take a lot of energy.

Moreover, the family is really harmful to the court, and it also makes outsiders look at jokes.

I suggest you don't go to court because of anger. If the money is not bad, it is better to mediate.

Your uncle said, "That land was planted by his family. Although I was assigned to the field, I never planted it. At the beginning, they picked dikes and paid agricultural taxes. Now that the land has been expropriated, the compensation should be taken by them. Giving me 15000 is also a matter of respect. " This is obviously unreasonable. Why don't you ask him? Even if my field is rented out, I will make money, and I will give it to you for nothing. If you don't ask for rent, you will take up our compensation!

Look for the compensation documents in the village to see what the specific policies are and how to divide the money. If there is a document, there is a basis. If you really want to mediate, it is also tenable. Try to get the money back.

To say the least, even if the mediation is not satisfactory, it is not too late for you to sue again. Taking 15000 will not affect your future prosecution.