Nanny consulting joke

With the state's rectification of the education industry, especially the regulation of off-campus education and training institutions, "educational capitalization" has really stopped, which is very beneficial to students and parents. For parents, it lightens the family economic pressure, and for students, it lightens the educational pressure, so that education can return to school and achieve the goal of "reducing the burden". But with the passage of time, the present off-campus training institutions have developed new ways.

First of all, "nanny tutoring" is a new variant of after-school remedial form, but it should also be prohibited within the scope of policy. The industry of making up lessons outside school has existed for many years. In recent years, it is not parents or students who really benefit from making up classes outside school, but the "capital" behind education. On the one hand, we constantly publicize new educational concepts and advocate the benefits of making up lessons outside school, on the other hand, we constantly raise the charging standard for making up lessons outside school. In this case, everyone takes part in make-up classes, but they are not necessarily better than others, which leads to the fatigue of parents and students.

Secondly, for the sudden fire of "nanny-style tutoring", there are both reasons for cutting leeks and factors for the industry to save itself. On the one hand, since "nanny tutoring" has become popular, it shows that it has become a commercial form, and the price of this kind of supplementary education is very high. People who can afford such a tutor will always be "very few". However, in this case, it is still widely publicized. It can only be said that this is another new hype mode, which aims to increase parents' "anxiety" and thus selectively cut leeks. Otherwise,

On the other hand, it is also a way for the industry to save itself. For those who make up lessons outside school, the behavior of making up lessons is prohibited from the policy aspect, so these practitioners definitely need to develop new "business lessons", and if this "business lesson" is to be known and accepted by the public, then it needs to be hyped. It is under this demand that "nanny tutoring" is on fire, which not only publicizes the new format of making up lessons, but also gives a clear price tag. At this time, for practitioners, it is necessary to carry out speculation.

Finally, for "nanny-style tutoring", parents should keep a clear head and avoid being cut by leeks. There is a big problem in the charging standard of "nanny tutoring". At present, there are very few families who can pay such wages to make up lessons for students, and the teaching ability of teachers who participate in making up lessons is also worrying. After all, no on-the-job teacher is willing to take risks to do such illegal operations when he knows that he violates the policy. However, teachers who spend a lot of money to make up lessons have real teaching experience besides rich theory, which is debatable.